Family interventions for schizophrenia in Italy: randomized controlled trial.

Giuseppe Carrà, Cristina Montomoli, Massimi Clerici, Carlo Lorenzo Cazzullo
Author Information
  1. Giuseppe Carrà: Department of Mental Health Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, 48 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EY, UK. g.carra@ucl.ac.uk

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of multiple group family treatment for Schizophrenia.
METHOD: Relatives were randomly provided with an informative programme (n = 50), or allocated to receive an additional support programme (n = 26). Patients did not attend the programme to overcome cultural and organizational implementation barriers. The 12 and 24 months clinical and family outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: Patients' compliance with standard care was greater at 12 months in the more intensive behavioural management group over a control group receiving treatment as usual (TAU) (n = 25). A reduction in levels of expressed emotion (EE), significantly more frequent in those receiving the additional support programme than just the informative, occurred after treatment completion. Other clinical and family outcomes did not differ. However, treatment benefits declined at 24 months, when baseline high EE was again predictive of patient's admission and relatives were more vulnerable to objective burden. Baseline illness severity variables predicted a number of medium and long-term poor clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Although family psychoeducation has been tested in a wide range of Anglo-Saxon settings, there remains need to assess outcomes more internationally. Effective family interventions for people with schizophrenia probably require continued administration of key-elements or ongoing informal support to deal with the vicissitudes of illnesses.

References

  1. Schizophr Bull. 2000;26(1):5-20 [PMID: 10755667]
  2. Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;158(2):163-75 [PMID: 11156795]
  3. Psychol Med. 1994 Aug;24(3):565-78 [PMID: 7991739]
  4. Clin Psychol Rev. 2000 Aug;20(5):633-66 [PMID: 10860170]
  5. Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;185:283-90 [PMID: 15458987]
  6. Br J Psychiatry. 1989 Jan;154:58-66 [PMID: 2673479]
  7. Schizophr Res. 2002 May 1;55(1-2):179-86 [PMID: 11955977]
  8. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;35(11):487-93 [PMID: 11197923]
  9. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;67(3):443-52 [PMID: 16649832]
  10. Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Aug;165(2):239-47 [PMID: 7953039]
  11. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005 Aug;255(4):223-31 [PMID: 15549342]
  12. Psychol Med. 1994 Aug;24(3):707-18 [PMID: 7991753]
  13. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976 Jun;33(6):766-71 [PMID: 938196]
  14. Psychol Med. 2002 Jul;32(5):763-82 [PMID: 12171372]
  15. Fam Process. 2003 Spring;42(1):91-103 [PMID: 12698601]
  16. J Marital Fam Ther. 2003 Apr;29(2):223-45 [PMID: 12728780]
  17. Br J Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;161:217-22 [PMID: 1521105]
  18. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006 Jun;256(4):246-55 [PMID: 16311896]
  19. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Jun;55(6):547-52 [PMID: 9633674]
  20. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1989 Winter;35(4):313-23 [PMID: 2628374]
  21. Br J Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;161:223-9 [PMID: 1355691]
  22. Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Nov;55(11):1276-84 [PMID: 15534017]
  23. Br J Psychiatry. 1995 Oct;167(4):473-9 [PMID: 8829715]
  24. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006 Feb;256(1):37-43 [PMID: 16010602]
  25. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1994;382:46-53 [PMID: 8091997]
  26. Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57(4):271-7 [PMID: 12888401]
  27. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984 Dec;41(12 ):1169-77 [PMID: 6150694]
  28. Psychol Med. 1996 Mar;26(2):333-42 [PMID: 8685289]
  29. Psychol Med. 1998 Mar;28(2):453-61 [PMID: 9572102]
  30. Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Jul;52(7):935-42 [PMID: 11433111]
  31. Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;184:48-57 [PMID: 14702227]
  32. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1999;249(3):162-7 [PMID: 10433131]
  33. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;38(2):69-75 [PMID: 12563548]
  34. Br J Psychiatry. 1988 Apr;152:477-81 [PMID: 3167397]
  35. Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Jul;52(7):903-10 [PMID: 11433107]
  36. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2000 May-Aug;23(3-4):197-214 [PMID: 10981267]
  37. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(4):CD000088 [PMID: 14583908]
  38. Schizophr Bull. 2001;27(1):73-92 [PMID: 11215551]
  39. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1989 Aug;40(8):831-5 [PMID: 2759574]
  40. Clin Psychol Rev. 1999 Nov;19(7):819-41 [PMID: 10520437]
  41. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1976 Jun;15(2):157-65 [PMID: 938822]
  42. New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1998 Spring;(77):33-41 [PMID: 9610145]
  43. Psychiatr Serv. 2003 May;54(5):633-5 [PMID: 12719493]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Caregivers
Cost of Illness
Employment
Expressed Emotion
Family Therapy
Female
Health Education
Hospitalization
Humans
Italy
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Patient Compliance
Predictive Value of Tests
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Recurrence
Schizophrenia
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0familytreatmentprogrammeoutcomesgroupn=supportmonthsclinicalinformativeadditional1224receivingEEinterventionsschizophreniaOBJECTIVE:evaluateeffectivenessmultipleSchizophreniaMETHOD:Relativesrandomlyprovided50allocatedreceive26PatientsattendovercomeculturalorganizationalimplementationbarriersassessedRESULTS:Patients'compliancestandardcaregreaterintensivebehaviouralmanagementcontrolusualTAU25reductionlevelsexpressedemotionsignificantlyfrequentjustoccurredcompletiondifferHoweverbenefitsdeclinedbaselinehighpredictivepatient'sadmissionrelativesvulnerableobjectiveburdenBaselineillnessseverityvariablespredictednumbermediumlong-termpoorCONCLUSIONS:AlthoughpsychoeducationtestedwiderangeAnglo-SaxonsettingsremainsneedassessinternationallyEffectivepeopleprobablyrequirecontinuedadministrationkey-elementsongoinginformaldealvicissitudesillnessesFamilyItaly:randomizedcontrolledtrial

Similar Articles

Cited By