Local temporal distinctiveness does not benefit auditory verbal and spatial serial recall.

Fabrice B R Parmentier, Suzanne King, Ian Dennis
Author Information
  1. Fabrice B R Parmentier: School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, England. fabrice.parmentier@plymouth.ac.uk

Abstract

In the present study, we examined the role of randomly arranged temporal intervals preceding and following items (pre- and postitem intervals, respectively) in auditory verbal and spatial recall tasks. The duration of the pre- and postitem intervals did not affect serial recall performance. This finding calls into question (1) the suggestion that the interval following an item permits the consolidation of information in memory, even in a relatively demanding spatial task, and (2) the prediction that temporal distinctiveness should improve performance. The latter was explored further by showing that in contrast to our empirical data, a relative temporal distinctiveness model produced significant increases in recall performance when pre- and postitem intervals increased. The results are discussed with regard to recent studies revisiting the role of temporal isolation in short-term serial memory.

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 May;31(3):412-27 [PMID: 15910128]
  2. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Mar;9(1):59-79 [PMID: 12026954]
  3. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Apr;55(2):391-424 [PMID: 12047051]
  4. Memory. 2001 Jul;9(4):323-331 [PMID: 11747586]
  5. Mem Cognit. 2006 Sep;34(6):1368-75 [PMID: 17225515]
  6. Memory. 2005 Apr-May;13(3-4):308-17 [PMID: 15948615]
  7. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jan;31(1):175-81 [PMID: 15641915]
  8. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):999-1004 [PMID: 16615319]
  9. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):771-90 [PMID: 15732687]
  10. Memory. 2005 Apr-May;13(3-4):283-92 [PMID: 15948613]
  11. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Apr;11(2):289-95 [PMID: 15260195]
  12. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1996 Feb;49(1):159-77 [PMID: 8920101]
  13. Memory. 1996 May;4(3):225-42 [PMID: 8735609]
  14. Br J Psychol. 1998 May;89 ( Pt 2):285-308 [PMID: 9644824]
  15. Mem Cognit. 1990 May;18(3):251-69 [PMID: 2192233]
  16. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Jul;21(4):1008-18 [PMID: 7673864]
  17. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Jun;11(3):501-7 [PMID: 15376802]
  18. Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Sep;7(3):403-23 [PMID: 11082850]
  19. Memory. 2005 Apr-May;13(3-4):357-63 [PMID: 15948621]
  20. Cognition. 2001 Jun;80(1-2):97-126 [PMID: 11245841]
  21. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Sep;26(5):1188-97 [PMID: 11009252]
  22. Psychol Rev. 2000 Jan;107(1):127-81 [PMID: 10687405]
  23. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Jan;12(1):3-15 [PMID: 2949048]
  24. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jan;26(1):222-38 [PMID: 10682299]
  25. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Mar;16(2):316-27 [PMID: 2137870]
  26. Mem Cognit. 1993 Sep;21(5):689-98 [PMID: 8412719]
  27. Cogn Psychol. 1998 Jul;36(2):73-137 [PMID: 9721198]

MeSH Term

Humans
Mental Recall
Models, Psychological
Reaction Time
Space Perception
Speech Perception
Verbal Behavior
Vocabulary

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0temporalintervalsrecallpre-postitemspatialserialperformancedistinctivenessrolefollowingauditoryverbalmemorypresentstudyexaminedrandomlyarrangedprecedingitemsrespectivelytasksdurationaffectfindingcallsquestion1suggestionintervalitempermitsconsolidationinformationevenrelativelydemandingtask2predictionimprovelatterexploredshowingcontrastempiricaldatarelativemodelproducedsignificantincreasesincreasedresultsdiscussedregardrecentstudiesrevisitingisolationshort-termLocalbenefit

Similar Articles

Cited By