Ethical research with participants who are deaf.

Roz Dixon
Author Information
  1. Roz Dixon: Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College, University of London, 26 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DQ, UK. r.dixon@bbk.ac.uk

Abstract

When conducting research with participants who are deaf there is a range of potential issues to be considered: issues relating to language and communication, participants' past experience and culture, and the potential power imbalance between researcher and participant. From an ethical perspective these may compromise informed consent and confidentiality, may inadvertently result in deception and may interfere with the validity of the data. The consequences may be negative for both the deaf population and the research community. This paper highlights the issues that arose in four studies with participants who were deaf and discusses the extent to which the measures taken were effective.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Aggression
Behavioral Research
Communication
Confidentiality
Deafness
Deception
Disabled Children
Education of Hearing Disabled
Humans
Informed Consent
Interviews as Topic
Persons With Hearing Impairments
Research Design
Researcher-Subject Relations
Schools
Students
United Kingdom

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0deafmayresearchparticipantsissuespotentialconductingrangeconsidered:relatinglanguagecommunicationparticipants'pastexperienceculturepowerimbalanceresearcherparticipantethicalperspectivecompromiseinformedconsentconfidentialityinadvertentlyresultdeceptioninterferevaliditydataconsequencesnegativepopulationcommunitypaperhighlightsarosefourstudiesdiscussesextentmeasurestakeneffectiveEthicalBiomedicalBehavioralResearch

Similar Articles

Cited By