Distinctiveness revisited: unpredictable temporal isolation does not benefit short-term serial recall of heard or seen events.

Lisa M Nimmo, Stephan Lewandowsky
Author Information
  1. Lisa M Nimmo: School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley. lisan@psy.uwa.edu.au

Abstract

The notion of a link between time and memory is intuitively appealing and forms the core assumption of temporal distinctiveness models. Distinctiveness models predict that items that are temporally isolated from their neighbors at presentation should be recalled better than items that are temporally crowded. By contrast, event-based theories consider time to be incidental to the processes that govern memory, and such theories would not imply a temporal isolation advantage unless participants engaged in a consolidation process (e.g., rehearsal or selective encoding) that exploited the temporal structure of the list. In this report, we examine two studies that assessed the effect of temporal distinctiveness on memory, using auditory (Experiment 1) and auditory and visual (Experiment 2) presentation with unpredictably varying interitem intervals. The results show that with unpredictable intervals temporal isolation does not benefit memory, regardless of presentation modality.

References

  1. Psychol Sci. 2006 Jan;17(1):67-73 [PMID: 16371146]
  2. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Mar;9(1):59-79 [PMID: 12026954]
  3. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Sep;18(5):931-7 [PMID: 1402717]
  4. Psychol Rev. 1998 Oct;105(4):761-81 [PMID: 9830378]
  5. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 [PMID: 9176952]
  6. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):999-1004 [PMID: 16615319]
  7. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):771-90 [PMID: 15732687]
  8. Memory. 2005 Apr-May;13(3-4):283-92 [PMID: 15948613]
  9. Memory. 1996 May;4(3):225-42 [PMID: 8735609]
  10. Psychol Rev. 1993 Apr;100(2):183-203 [PMID: 8483981]
  11. Mem Cognit. 1989 Jul;17(4):373-83 [PMID: 2761398]
  12. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42 [PMID: 9176953]
  13. Mem Cognit. 1990 May;18(3):251-69 [PMID: 2192233]
  14. Mem Cognit. 1989 Jul;17(4):384-97 [PMID: 2761399]
  15. Mem Cognit. 1991 Sep;19(5):514-22 [PMID: 1956312]
  16. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 Feb;53(1):1-22 [PMID: 10718061]
  17. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1983 Aug 11;302(1110):267-82 [PMID: 6137846]
  18. Mem Cognit. 1989 Jul;17(4):398-422 [PMID: 2668697]
  19. Psychol Rev. 2000 Jan;107(1):127-81 [PMID: 10687405]
  20. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Jan;12(1):3-15 [PMID: 2949048]
  21. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Mar;16(2):316-27 [PMID: 2137870]
  22. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988 Oct;14(4):728-39 [PMID: 2972805]
  23. Cogn Psychol. 1998 Jul;36(2):73-137 [PMID: 9721198]

MeSH Term

Attention
Humans
Memory, Short-Term
Practice, Psychological
Psychomotor Performance
Reaction Time
Reading
Serial Learning
Speech Perception
Time Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0temporalmemorypresentationisolationtimedistinctivenessmodelsDistinctivenessitemstemporallytheoriesauditoryExperimentintervalsunpredictablebenefitnotionlinkintuitivelyappealingformscoreassumptionpredictisolatedneighborsrecalledbettercrowdedcontrastevent-basedconsiderincidentalprocessesgovernimplyadvantageunlessparticipantsengagedconsolidationprocessegrehearsalselectiveencodingexploitedstructurelistreportexaminetwostudiesassessedeffectusing1visual2unpredictablyvaryinginteritemresultsshowregardlessmodalityrevisited:short-termserialrecallheardseenevents

Similar Articles

Cited By