Conditional relations with compound abstract stimuli using a go/no-go procedure.

Paula Debert, Maria Amelia Matos, William McIlvane
Author Information
  1. Paula Debert: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Mello Moraes, 1721, São Paulo, SP, 05508-900, Brazil. pdebert@uol.com.br

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether emergent conditional relations could be established with a go/no-go procedure using compound abstract stimuli. The procedure was conducted with 6 adult humans. During training, responses emitted in the presence of certain stimulus compounds (A1B1, A2B2, A3B3, B1C1, B2C2, and B3C3) were followed by reinforcing consequences (points); responses emitted in the presence of other compounds (A1B2, A1B3, A2B1, A2B3, A3B1, A3B2, B1C2, B1C3, B2C1, B2C3, B3C1 and B3C2) were not (i.e., extinction). During subsequent tests of emergent relations, new configurations (BA, CB, AC, and CA relations) were presented, formed by the recombination of training stimuli and structurally resembling tests usually employed in stimulus equivalence studies. Results showed that all 6 participants displayed immediate emergence of relations consistent with symmetry. Four participants exhibited emergent relations consistent with both transitivity and equivalence. These results indicate that a go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli can establish emergent conditional relations, thus providing a procedural alternative to the matching-to-sample procedures commonly used in studies of stimulus equivalence.

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Nov;60(3):529-42 [PMID: 16812718]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:281-4 [PMID: 13718829]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Jul;86(1):65-80 [PMID: 16903493]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Jul;86(1):81-107 [PMID: 16903494]
  5. J Exp Child Psychol. 1982 Jun;33(3):475-91 [PMID: 7097156]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):565-601 [PMID: 16812079]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):297-304 [PMID: 3711776]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Sep;84(2):147-65 [PMID: 16262184]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):365-81 [PMID: 3894561]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):449-65 [PMID: 12507014]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):249-60 [PMID: 16812596]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):23-44 [PMID: 7057127]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):127-46 [PMID: 10966100]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 May;59(3):471-82 [PMID: 8315365]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):27-45 [PMID: 16812849]
  16. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;32(1):25-33 [PMID: 10201101]

Grants

  1. P01 HD025995/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. HD25995/NICHD NIH HHS
  3. HD04147/NICHD NIH HHS
  4. P30 HD004147/NICHD NIH HHS
  5. HD39816/NICHD NIH HHS
  6. R01 HD039816/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Association Learning
Attention
Discrimination Learning
Female
Humans
Inhibition, Psychological
Male
Orientation
Problem Solving
Psychomotor Performance
Reinforcement Schedule

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0relationsemergentprocedurestimuligo/no-gocompoundstimulusequivalenceconditionalusingabstract6trainingresponsesemittedpresencecompoundstestsstudiesparticipantsconsistentaimstudyevaluatewhetherestablishedconductedadulthumanscertainA1B1A2B2A3B3B1C1B2C2B3C3followedreinforcingconsequencespointsA1B2A1B3A2B1A2B3A3B1A3B2B1C2B1C3B2C1B2C3B3C1B3C2ieextinctionsubsequentnewconfigurationsBACBACCApresentedformedrecombinationstructurallyresemblingusuallyemployedResultsshoweddisplayedimmediateemergencesymmetryFourexhibitedtransitivityresultsindicatecanestablishthusprovidingproceduralalternativematching-to-sampleprocedurescommonlyusedConditional

Similar Articles

Cited By