RIFLE classification can predict short-term prognosis in critically ill cirrhotic patients.

Chang-Chyi Jenq, Ming-Hung Tsai, Ya-Chung Tian, Chan-Yu Lin, Chun Yang, Nai-Jen Liu, Jau-Min Lien, Yung-Chang Chen, Ji-Tseng Fang, Pan-Chi Chen, Chih-Wei Yang
Author Information
  1. Chang-Chyi Jenq: Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 199 Tung Hwa North Road, 105 Taipei, Taiwan.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: End-stage liver disease is frequently complicated by renal function disturbances. Cirrhotic patients with renal failure admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) have high mortality rates. This study analyzed the outcomes of critically ill cirrhotic patients and identified the association between prognosis and RIFLE (risk of renal failure, injury to kidney, failure of kidney function, loss of kidney function, and end-stage renal failure) classification, in comparison with other five scoring systems.
DESIGN: Prospective, clinical study.
SETTING: Ten-bed specialized hepatogastroenterology ICU in a university hospital in Taiwan.
PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and thirty-four cirrhotic patients consecutively admitted to ICU during a 1.5-year period.
INTERVENTIONS: Thirty-two demographic, clinical and laboratory variables were analyzed as predictors of survival.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 65.7%. There was a progressive and significant increase (chi2 for trend: p<0.001) in mortality based on RIFLE classification severity. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that RIFLE classification and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on the first day of ICU admission were independent risk factors for hospital mortality. By using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the RIFLE category and SOFA both indicated a good discriminative power (AUROC 0.837+/-0.036 and 0.917+/-0.025; p<0.001). Cumulative survival rates at 6-month follow-up differed significantly (p<0.05) for non-ARF vs. RIFLE-R, RIFLE-I, and RIFLE-F.
CONCLUSION: Both SOFA and RIFLE category showed high discriminative power in predicting hospital mortality in critically ill patients with cirrhosis. The RIFLE classification is a simple and easily applied evaluative tool with good prognostic abilities.

References

  1. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2000 Dec;279(6):F1110-5 [PMID: 11097630]
  2. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Mar;31(3):356-72 [PMID: 15719149]
  3. Lancet. 2003 Nov 29;362(9398):1819-27 [PMID: 14654322]
  4. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Feb;81(2):542-6 [PMID: 16427848]
  5. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002 Dec;8(6):509-14 [PMID: 12454534]
  6. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9 Suppl 4:179-82 [PMID: 7800254]
  7. Crit Care Med. 2006 Jul;34(7):1913-7 [PMID: 16715038]
  8. Hepatology. 2001 Feb;33(2):464-70 [PMID: 11172350]
  9. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006 Dec;12(6):557-60 [PMID: 17077686]
  10. Ann Surg. 1985 Dec;202(6):685-93 [PMID: 4073980]
  11. J Clin Invest. 2004 Jul;114(1):5-14 [PMID: 15232604]
  12. Semin Liver Dis. 1997;17(3):233-47 [PMID: 9308128]
  13. Hepatology. 2006 Apr;43(4):673-81 [PMID: 16557538]
  14. Clin Nephrol. 2004 Feb;61(2):111-8 [PMID: 14989630]
  15. Crit Care Med. 1988 Jul;16(7):671-8 [PMID: 3371043]
  16. Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5 [PMID: 15405679]
  17. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003 Aug;14(8):2178-87 [PMID: 12874474]
  18. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jan;31(1):28-40 [PMID: 15609018]
  19. Hepatology. 2001 Aug;34(2):255-61 [PMID: 11481609]
  20. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Feb;32(2):207-216 [PMID: 16450098]
  21. J Nephrol. 2003 Jul-Aug;16(4):558-65 [PMID: 14696759]
  22. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Sep;32(3):432-43 [PMID: 9740160]
  23. Hepatology. 2001 Oct;34(4 Pt 1):671-6 [PMID: 11584362]
  24. N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 15;350(16):1646-54 [PMID: 15084697]
  25. Lancet. 2005 Jan 29-Feb 4;365(9457):417-30 [PMID: 15680458]
  26. Br J Surg. 1973 Aug;60(8):646-9 [PMID: 4541913]
  27. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Oct;32(10 ):1553-9 [PMID: 16941165]
  28. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Aug 1;24(3):453-64 [PMID: 16886911]
  29. Crit Care. 2004 Aug;8(4):R204-12 [PMID: 15312219]
  30. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Feb;20(2):354-60 [PMID: 15598666]
  31. Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45 [PMID: 3203132]
  32. Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Feb;60(2):160-6 [PMID: 16451287]
  33. Crit Care. 2006;10(3):R73 [PMID: 16696865]
  34. Hepatology. 1996 Jan;23(1):164-76 [PMID: 8550036]
  35. Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10 [PMID: 8844239]
  36. N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 20;339(8):533-41 [PMID: 9709047]
  37. Hepatology. 1988 Sep-Oct;8(5):1151-7 [PMID: 2971015]
  38. Hepatology. 2004 Apr;39(4):1075-87 [PMID: 15057912]
  39. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Oct;21(10):2867-73 [PMID: 16799171]
  40. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003 Sep;37(3):251-7 [PMID: 12960725]
  41. Chest. 1991 Dec;100(6):1619-36 [PMID: 1959406]
  42. Hepatology. 2006 Feb;43(2 Suppl 1):S121-31 [PMID: 16447289]
  43. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Dec;31(12):1693-9 [PMID: 16244877]
  44. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Mar;33(3):409-13 [PMID: 17165018]
  45. Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29 [PMID: 3928249]

MeSH Term

Critical Illness
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Kidney Failure, Chronic
Liver Cirrhosis
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Survival Analysis
Taiwan

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0RIFLEpatientsmortalityclassificationrenalfailurehospitalfunctioncriticallyillcirrhotickidneyICUp<0SOFAadmittedhighratesstudyanalyzedprognosisriskclinicalANDsurvival001indicatedAUROCcategorygooddiscriminativepower0OBJECTIVE:End-stageliverdiseasefrequentlycomplicateddisturbancesCirrhoticintensivecareunitsICUsoutcomesidentifiedassociationinjurylossend-stagecomparisonfivescoringsystemsDESIGN:ProspectiveSETTING:Ten-bedspecializedhepatogastroenterologyuniversityTaiwanPATIENTSPARTICIPANTS:Onehundredthirty-fourconsecutively15-yearperiodINTERVENTIONS:Thirty-twodemographiclaboratoryvariablespredictorsMEASUREMENTSMAINRESULTS:Overall657%progressivesignificantincreasechi2trend:basedseverityMultiplelogisticregressionanalysisSequentialOrganFailureAssessmentscorefirstdayadmissionindependentfactorsusingareasreceiveroperatingcharacteristiccurve837+/-0036917+/-0025Cumulative6-monthfollow-updifferedsignificantly05non-ARFvsRIFLE-RRIFLE-IRIFLE-FCONCLUSION:showedpredictingcirrhosissimpleeasilyappliedevaluativetoolprognosticabilitiescanpredictshort-term

Similar Articles

Cited By