Improving colorectal cancer screening among the medically underserved: a pilot study within a federally qualified health center.

Kishore Khankari, Mickey Eder, Chandra Y Osborn, Gregory Makoul, Marla Clayman, Silvia Skripkauskas, Linda Diamond-Shapiro, Dan Makundan, Michael S Wolf
Author Information
  1. Kishore Khankari: Access Community Health Network, Chicago, IL, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening rates remain low, especially among low-income and racial/ethnic minority groups.
OBJECTIVE: We pilot-tested a physician-directed strategy aimed at improving rates of recommendation and patient colorectal cancer screening completion at 1 federally qualified health center serving low-income, African-American and Hispanic patients. Colonoscopy was specifically targeted.
DESIGN: Single arm, pretest-posttest design.
SETTING: Urban.
PATIENTS: 154 screening-eligible, yet nonadherent primary care patients receiving care at an urban, federally qualified health center.
INTERVENTION: 1) manually tracking screening-eligible patients, 2) mailing patients a physician letter and brochure before medical visits, 3) health literacy training to help physicians improve their communication with patients to work to resolution, and 4) establishing a "feedback loop" to routinely monitor patient compliance.
MEASUREMENT: Chart review of whether patients received a physician recommendation for screening, and completion of any colorectal cancer screening test 12 months after intervention. Physicians recorded patients' qualitative reasons for noncompliance, and a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis for screening promotion was also conducted.
RESULTS: The baseline screening rate was 11.5%, with 31.6% of patients having received a recommendation from their physician. At 1-year follow-up, rates of screening completion had increased to 27.9 percent (p < .001), and physician recommendation had increased to 92.9% (p < .001). Common reasons for nonadherence included patient readiness (60.7%), competing health problems (11.9%), and fear or anxiety concerning the procedure (8.3%). The total cost for implementing the intervention was $4,676 and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the intervention was $106 per additional patient screened by colonoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: The intervention appears to be a feasible means to improve colorectal cancer screening rates among patients served by community health centers. However, more attention to patient decision making and education may be needed to further increase screening rates.

References

  1. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Dec;16(12):822-30 [PMID: 11903761]
  2. Prev Med. 2004 Apr;38(4):403-11 [PMID: 15020173]
  3. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2004 Jul 23;53(5):1-100 [PMID: 15269697]
  4. Am J Public Health. 1996 Dec;86(12):1794-7 [PMID: 9003140]
  5. Lancet. 1998 Oct 31;352(9138):1439 [PMID: 9807992]
  6. JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1161-7 [PMID: 16522837]
  7. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Nov;20(11):989-95 [PMID: 16307622]
  8. JAMA. 1996 Oct 23-30;276(16):1339-41 [PMID: 8861994]
  9. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 1;23(7):1548-54 [PMID: 15735130]
  10. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002 May-Jun;52(3):134-49 [PMID: 12018928]
  11. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000 Oct;92(10):492-500 [PMID: 11105730]
  12. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1996 Summer;2(3):54-9 [PMID: 10186680]
  13. Prev Med. 2004 Jul;39(1):56-63 [PMID: 15207986]
  14. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jul 16;137(2):132-41 [PMID: 12118972]
  15. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997 May-Jun;47(3):154-60 [PMID: 9152173]
  16. Gastroenterology. 2003 Feb;124(2):544-60 [PMID: 12557158]
  17. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006 Feb;17(1):47-54 [PMID: 16520508]
  18. Am J Public Health. 1994 Jan;84(1):119-21 [PMID: 8279598]
  19. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):301-12 [PMID: 16051459]
  20. Cancer. 2004 Sep 1;101(5 Suppl):1229-38 [PMID: 15316909]
  21. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8877-83 [PMID: 16314648]
  22. Prev Med. 2002 Jul;35(1):87-96 [PMID: 12079445]
  23. Health Educ Behav. 2003 Jun;30(3):322-36 [PMID: 19731499]

Grants

  1. K01 EH000067/NCEH CDC HHS
  2. K01 EH000067-01/NCEH CDC HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Black or African American
Aged
Colonoscopy
Colorectal Neoplasms
Community Health Centers
Female
Health Education
Hispanic or Latino
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
Middle Aged
Occult Blood
Patient Compliance
Physician-Patient Relations
Pilot Projects
Poverty Areas
Risk Factors
United States
Urban Population

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0screeningpatientshealthcancerratespatientrecommendationcolorectalphysicianinterventionamongcompletionfederallyqualifiedcenterlow-income1screening-eligiblecareimprovereceivedreasonscost-effectiveness11increasedp<0019%BACKGROUND:Colorectalremainlowespeciallyracial/ethnicminoritygroupsOBJECTIVE:pilot-testedphysician-directedstrategyaimedimprovingservingAfrican-AmericanHispanicColonoscopyspecificallytargetedDESIGN:Singlearmpretest-posttestdesignSETTING:UrbanPATIENTS:154yetnonadherentprimaryreceivingurbanINTERVENTION:manuallytracking2mailingletterbrochuremedicalvisits3literacytraininghelpphysicianscommunicationworkresolution4establishing"feedbackloop"routinelymonitorcomplianceMEASUREMENT:Chartreviewwhethertest12monthsPhysiciansrecordedpatients'qualitativenoncompliancepreliminaryanalysispromotionalsoconductedRESULTS:baselinerate5%316%1-yearfollow-up279percent92Commonnonadherenceincludedreadiness607%competingproblemsfearanxietyconcerningprocedure83%totalcostimplementing$4676incrementalratio$106peradditionalscreenedcolonoscopyCONCLUSIONS:appearsfeasiblemeansservedcommunitycentersHoweverattentiondecisionmakingeducationmayneededincreaseImprovingmedicallyunderserved:pilotstudywithin

Similar Articles

Cited By