Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate a physical activity intervention in churches.

Melissa Bopp, Sara Wilcox, Marilyn Laken, Steven P Hooker, Ruth Saunders, Deborah Parra-Medina, Kimberly Butler, Lottie McClorin
Author Information
  1. Melissa Bopp: Department of Kinesiology, 1A Natatorium, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. mbopp@ksu.edu

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health-e-AME was a 3-year intervention designed to promote physical activity at African Methodist Episcopal churches across South Carolina. It is based on a community-participation model designed to disseminate interventions through trained volunteer health directors.
METHODS: We used the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework to evaluate this intervention through interviews with 50 health directors.
RESULTS: Eighty percent of the churches that had a health director trained during the first year of the intervention and 52% of churches that had a health director trained during the second year adopted at least one component of the intervention. Lack of motivation or commitment from the congregation was the most common barrier to adoption. Intervention activities reached middle-aged women mainly. The intervention was moderately well implemented, and adherence to its principles was adequate. Maintenance analyses showed that individual participants in the intervention's physical activity components continued their participation as long as the church offered them, but churches had difficulties continuing to offer physical activity sessions. The effectiveness analysis showed that the intervention produced promising, but not significant, trends in levels of physical activity.
CONCLUSION: Our use of the RE-AIM framework to evaluate this intervention serves as a model for a comprehensive evaluation of the health effects of community programs to promote health.

References

  1. Health Promot Int. 2004 Jun;19(2):235-45 [PMID: 15128715]
  2. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7 [PMID: 10474547]
  3. Hygie. 1986 Sep;5(3):9-12 [PMID: 3759096]
  4. Prev Med. 1996 May-Jun;25(3):277-85 [PMID: 8781005]
  5. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1390-6 [PMID: 10474558]
  6. Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Jan;1(1):A09 [PMID: 15634371]
  7. Ethn Dis. 2004 Summer;14(3 Suppl 1):S93-101 [PMID: 15682777]
  8. Ann Behav Med. 2005 Apr;29 Suppl:66-75 [PMID: 15921491]
  9. Am J Prev Med. 2006 Jan;30(1):67-73 [PMID: 16414426]
  10. Health Promot Pract. 2007 Jan;8(1):69-78 [PMID: 16885511]
  11. Am J Prev Med. 2007 Feb;32(2):131-8 [PMID: 17234487]
  12. Health Educ Behav. 2000 Apr;27(2):241-53 [PMID: 10768805]
  13. J Health Commun. 2000 Apr-Jun;5(2):175-88 [PMID: 11010348]
  14. J Cancer Educ. 2000 Fall;15(3):164-7 [PMID: 11019765]
  15. Ethn Dis. 2001 Fall;11(4):817-22 [PMID: 11763306]
  16. Ethn Dis. 2001 Fall;11(4):823-33 [PMID: 11763307]
  17. Public Health Rep. 2001;116 Suppl 1:68-81 [PMID: 11889276]
  18. Diabetes Care. 2003 Aug;26(8):2451-6 [PMID: 12882877]
  19. Am J Public Health. 2003 Aug;93(8):1261-7 [PMID: 12893608]
  20. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003 Aug 22;52(8):1-80 [PMID: 14532868]
  21. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2004 Apr;32(2):57-63 [PMID: 15064649]
  22. Am J Public Health. 2004 Jun;94(6):1030-6 [PMID: 15249311]

Grants

  1. CCR421476-01/PHS HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Community Participation
Exercise
Female
Health Promotion
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Religion and Medicine
South Carolina

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0interventionhealthphysicalactivitychurchestrainedRE-AIMframeworkevaluatedesignedpromotemodeldirectorsMaintenancedirectoryearshowedINTRODUCTION:Health-e-AME3-yearAfricanMethodistEpiscopalacrossSouthCarolinabasedcommunity-participationdisseminateinterventionsvolunteerMETHODS:usedReachEffectivenessAdoptionImplementationinterviews50RESULTS:Eightypercentfirst52%secondadoptedleastonecomponentLackmotivationcommitmentcongregationcommonbarrieradoptionInterventionactivitiesreachedmiddle-agedwomenmainlymoderatelywellimplementedadherenceprinciplesadequateanalysesindividualparticipantsintervention'scomponentscontinuedparticipationlongchurchoffereddifficultiescontinuingoffersessionseffectivenessanalysisproducedpromisingsignificanttrendslevelsCONCLUSION:useservescomprehensiveevaluationeffectscommunityprogramsUsing

Similar Articles

Cited By (26)