Toggle navigation
Data Resources
Computing Analysis
Data Network
Standards
OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Search
Advanced Search
Source: PubMed
Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing
Oct, 2007;14 (7): 623-4.
Editors, midwives and peer review.
Dawn Freshwater
Author Information
PMID: 17880655
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01169.x
Abstract
No abstract text available.
MeSH Term
Editorial Policies
Humans
Midwifery
Peer Review
Editorial
1
CITATION
1
Total citation
0
Recent citations
0.45
Field Citation Ratio
0.05
Relative Citation Ratio
Word Cloud
Created with Highcharts 10.0.0
Editors
midwives
peer
review
Similar Articles
Nurse-midwives and the peer review process.
Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?
Peer Review: Notes for Reviewers, Authors and Editors.
Journal policies and editors' opinions on peer review.
Blind peer review: tips for authors, reviewers, and editors.
Nurse editors' views on the peer review process.
"Outing" peer review: medical editors scrutinize the value of secrecy.
From the editors: external peer review at HSR.
From the Editors' Desk: Peer Review at JGIM.
Developing new peer reviewers: tips for editors.
Cited By
No available data.
