Embedding an identity-matching task within a prompting hierarchy to facilitate acquisition of conditional discriminations in children with autism.

Wayne W Fisher, Tiffany Kodak, James W Moore
Author Information
  1. Wayne W Fisher: Munroe-Meyer Institute, UNMC, 985450 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198, USA.

Abstract

Least-to-most prompting hierarchies (e.g., progressing from verbal to modeled to physical prompts until the target response occurs) may be ineffective when the prompts do not cue the individual to attend to the relevant stimulus dimensions. In such cases, emission of the target response persistently requires one or more of the higher level prompts, a condition called prompt dependence (Clark & Green, 2004). Reinforcement of differential observing responses (DORs) has sometimes been used to ensure that participants attend to the relevant stimulus dimensions in matching-to-sample (MTS) tasks (e.g., Dube & McIlvane, 1999). For 2 participants with autism, we embedded an identity-matching task within a prompting hierarchy as a DOR to increase the likelihood that the participants attended to and discriminated the relevant features of the comparison stimuli in an MTS task. This procedure was compared with a traditional least-to-most prompting hierarchy and a no-reinforcement control condition in a multielement design. Results for both participants indicated that mastery-level acquisition of spoken-word-to-picture relations occurred only under the identity-matching condition. Findings are discussed relative to the use of DORs to facilitate acquisition of conditional discriminations in persons with autism or other conditions who do not attend to the comparison stimuli.

References

  1. J Autism Dev Disord. 2000 Oct;30(5):451-9 [PMID: 11098883]
  2. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Spring;23(1):43-52 [PMID: 2335485]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Sep;10(5):405-16 [PMID: 6050052]
  4. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;32(1):25-33 [PMID: 10201101]
  5. J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Fall;20(3):293-9 [PMID: 3667479]
  6. Psychol Rev. 1952 Nov;59(6):431-42 [PMID: 13004146]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jul;52(1):1-12 [PMID: 2769172]
  8. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Fall;12(3):431-9 [PMID: 511809]
  9. J Speech Hear Disord. 1988 Feb;53(1):94-107 [PMID: 2448548]
  10. Am J Ment Defic. 1975 May;79(6):680-9 [PMID: 1146860]
  11. Am J Ment Defic. 1978 Nov;83(3):297-303 [PMID: 717444]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):365-81 [PMID: 3894561]
  13. J Autism Dev Disord. 1979 Dec;9(4):361-82 [PMID: 521430]
  14. Psychol Bull. 1979 Nov;86(6):1236-54 [PMID: 515280]
  15. Am J Ment Retard. 1990 Nov;95(3):283-96 [PMID: 2261161]
  16. Am J Ment Defic. 1975 Sep;80(2):202-7 [PMID: 1163567]
  17. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Summer;30(2):339-42 [PMID: 9210311]
  18. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Fall;8(3):301-9 [PMID: 1184494]
  19. J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Winter;38(4):555-8 [PMID: 16463537]
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Mar;59(2):333-47 [PMID: 16812689]
  21. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):239-50 [PMID: 2103584]
  22. Res Dev Disabil. 1993 Nov-Dec;14(6):425-44 [PMID: 8296024]
  23. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Nov;60(3):571-85 [PMID: 8283149]
  24. J Appl Behav Anal. 2004 Winter;37(4):503-7 [PMID: 15669408]
  25. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1976;4(1):59-71 [PMID: 1270699]
  26. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Summer;18(2):155-66 [PMID: 4019351]
  27. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Winter;28(4):583-90 [PMID: 16795886]
  28. Am J Ment Retard. 2002 Jul;107(4):293-301 [PMID: 12069648]

MeSH Term

Autistic Disorder
Child
Cognition
Conditioning, Psychological
Cues
Discrimination Learning
Female
Humans
Social Facilitation

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0promptingparticipantspromptsattendrelevantconditionautismidentity-matchingtaskhierarchyacquisitionegtargetresponsestimulusdimensions&DORsMTSwithincomparisonstimulifacilitateconditionaldiscriminationsLeast-to-mosthierarchiesprogressingverbalmodeledphysicaloccursmayineffectivecueindividualcasesemissionpersistentlyrequiresonehigherlevelcalledpromptdependenceClarkGreen2004Reinforcementdifferentialobservingresponsessometimesusedensurematching-to-sampletasksDubeMcIlvane19992embeddedDORincreaselikelihoodattendeddiscriminatedfeaturesprocedurecomparedtraditionalleast-to-mostno-reinforcementcontrolmultielementdesignResultsindicatedmastery-levelspoken-word-to-picturerelationsoccurredFindingsdiscussedrelativeusepersonsconditionsEmbeddingchildren

Similar Articles

Cited By (14)