Transformation of the discriminative and eliciting functions of generalized relational stimuli.

Michael J Dougher, Derek A Hamilton, Brandi C Fink, Jennifer Harrington
Author Information
  1. Michael J Dougher: University of New Mexico, USA. dougher@unm.edu

Abstract

In three experiments, match-to-sample procedures were used with undergraduates to establish arbitrary relational functions for three abstract visual stimuli. In the presence of samples A, B, and C, participants were trained to select the smallest, middle, and largest member, respectively, of a series of three-comparison arrays. In Experiment 1, the B (choose middle) stimulus was then used to train a steady rate of keyboard pressing before the A (choose smallest) and the C (choose largest) stimuli were presented. Participants pressed slower to A and faster to C than to B. Then B was paired with mild shock in a Pavlovian procedure with skin conductance change as the dependent variable. When presented with A and C, 6 of 8 experimental participants showed smaller skin conductance changes to A and larger skin conductance changes to C than to B. In Experiment 2, A was then used as a sample in a match-to-sample procedure to establish an arbitrary size ranking among four same-sized colored circle comparisons. One of the middle circles was then used to establish a steady rate of pressing before the other circles were presented. Five of 6 participants responded slower to the "smaller" circle and faster to the "larger" circle than they did to the "middle" circle. In Experiment 3, A, B, and C were then presented on a series of test trials requiring participants to pick the comparison that was less than, greater than, or equal to the sample. Novel stimuli were included on some trials. Results indicated that the relational training procedures produced derived relations among the stimuli used in training and that these allowed correct inferences of relative size ranking among novel stimuli.

References

  1. Behav Processes. 1986 Sep;13(3):205-15 [PMID: 24925007]
  2. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Jul;23(4):968-86 [PMID: 9231439]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Sep;68(2):235-44 [PMID: 16812857]
  4. Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;23(2):239-54 [PMID: 22478349]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Sep;10(5):405-16 [PMID: 6050052]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 May;67(3):275-301 [PMID: 9163935]
  7. Anal Verbal Behav. 2003;19:19-27 [PMID: 22477253]
  8. Behav Res Ther. 1977;15(5):375-87 [PMID: 612338]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):127-46 [PMID: 10966100]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Sep;64(2):163-84 [PMID: 16812766]
  11. J Learn Disabil. 1991 May;24(5):292-303 [PMID: 2045726]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):381-92 [PMID: 16812000]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):293-309 [PMID: 2584916]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):331-51 [PMID: 16812745]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):369-78 [PMID: 16812584]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jul;56(1):119-37 [PMID: 16812641]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Sep;62(2):251-67 [PMID: 16812742]
  18. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1997 Sep;28(3):181-91 [PMID: 9327297]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 2004 Mar;81(2):189-204 [PMID: 23550325]
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Sep;50(2):125-44 [PMID: 16812554]
  21. Psychophysiology. 1987 May;24(3):346-52 [PMID: 3602292]
  22. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Summer;10(2):349-67 [PMID: 16795561]
  23. Anal Verbal Behav. 2003;19:11-8 [PMID: 22477252]
  24. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 May;55(3):287-304 [PMID: 2066702]
  25. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2001;28:101-38 [PMID: 11605362]
  26. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jul;50(1):1-20 [PMID: 3171472]

MeSH Term

Adult
Arousal
Attention
Color Perception
Conditioning, Classical
Discrimination Learning
Fear
Female
Galvanic Skin Response
Generalization, Stimulus
Humans
Male
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Practice, Psychological
Psychomotor Performance
Reaction Time
Size Perception
Transfer, Psychology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0stimuliBCusedparticipantspresentedcircleestablishrelationalmiddleExperimentchooseskinconductanceamongthreematch-to-sampleproceduresarbitraryfunctionssmallestlargestseriessteadyratepressingslowerfasterprocedure6changessamplesizerankingcirclestrialstrainingexperimentsundergraduatesabstractvisualpresencesamplestrainedselectmemberrespectivelythree-comparisonarrays1stimulustrainkeyboardParticipantspressedpairedmildshockPavlovianchangedependentvariable8experimentalshowedsmallerlarger2foursame-sizedcoloredcomparisonsOneFiveresponded"smaller""larger""middle"3testrequiringpickcomparisonlessgreaterequalNovelincludedResultsindicatedproducedderivedrelationsallowedcorrectinferencesrelativenovelTransformationdiscriminativeelicitinggeneralized

Similar Articles

Cited By