Shared attentional resources for global and local motion processing.

Paul F Bulakowski, David W Bressler, David Whitney
Author Information
  1. Paul F Bulakowski: Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. pbulakowski@ucdavis.edu

Abstract

One of the most important aspects of visual attention is its flexibility; our attentional "window" can be tuned to different spatial scales, allowing us to perceive large-scale global patterns and local features effortlessly. We investigated whether the perception of global and local motion competes for a common attentional resource. Subjects viewed arrays of individual moving Gabors that group to produce a global motion percept when subjects attended globally. When subjects attended locally, on the other hand, they could identify the direction of individual uncrowded Gabors. Subjects were required to devote their attention toward either scale of motion or divide it between global and local scales. We measured direction discrimination as a function of the validity of a precue, which was varied in opposite directions for global and local motion such that when the precue was valid for global motion, it was invalid for local motion and vice versa. There was a trade-off between global and local motion thresholds, such that increasing the validity of precues at one spatial scale simultaneously reduced thresholds at that spatial scale but increased thresholds at the other spatial scale. In a second experiment, we found a similar pattern of results for static-oriented Gabors: Attending to local orientation information impaired the subjects' ability to perceive globally defined orientation and vice versa. Thresholds were higher for orientation compared to motion, however, suggesting that motion discrimination in the first experiment was not driven by orientation information alone but by motion-specific processing. The results of these experiments demonstrate that a shared attentional resource flexibly moves between different spatial scales and allows for the perception of both local and global image features, whether these features are defined by motion or orientation.

References

  1. Vision Res. 2005 Nov;45(24):3027-49 [PMID: 16171844]
  2. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Dec 1;4(12):447-454 [PMID: 11115758]
  3. Vision Res. 1993 Oct;33(15):2091-107 [PMID: 8266651]
  4. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;44(6):904-13 [PMID: 12959498]
  5. Vision Res. 1985;25(5):625-60 [PMID: 3895725]
  6. J Neurophysiol. 2000 Jun;83(6):3525-36 [PMID: 10848568]
  7. Vision Res. 1993 Sep;33(14):1937-58 [PMID: 8249312]
  8. J Neurophysiol. 1999 Apr;81(4):1783-94 [PMID: 10200212]
  9. Vision Res. 2004 Jun;44(12):1367-74 [PMID: 15066396]
  10. J Vis. 2007 Jul 20;7(2):15.1-13 [PMID: 18217830]
  11. Trends Neurosci. 2001 May;24(5):295-300 [PMID: 11311383]
  12. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1998 May;26 Suppl 1:S114-6 [PMID: 9685042]
  13. Percept Psychophys. 1998 Feb;60(2):191-200 [PMID: 9529903]
  14. Vision Res. 2002 May;42(10):1287-306 [PMID: 12044759]
  15. J Neurophysiol. 1998 Apr;79(4):2218-21 [PMID: 9535981]
  16. Vision Res. 2001 Jul;41(15):1891-9 [PMID: 11412882]
  17. Perception. 1998;27(9):1041-54 [PMID: 10341934]
  18. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Feb;4(2):42-50 [PMID: 10652521]
  19. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Feb;4(2):93-102 [PMID: 12563280]
  20. Nature. 2003 Jul 17;424(6946):312-5 [PMID: 12867982]
  21. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1983 Dec;112(4):516-40 [PMID: 6229597]
  22. Schizophr Res. 2005 May 1;74(2-3):271-81 [PMID: 15722006]
  23. Vision Res. 1998 Oct;38(19):2863-7 [PMID: 9797982]
  24. Vision Res. 1999 Sep;39(19):3157-63 [PMID: 10615487]
  25. Science. 1992 Sep 11;257(5076):1563-5 [PMID: 1523411]
  26. Vision Res. 2005 May;45(11):1385-98 [PMID: 15743609]
  27. Vision Res. 1992 Dec;32(12):2341-7 [PMID: 1288010]
  28. Vision Res. 1997 Nov;37(22):3181-92 [PMID: 9463699]
  29. Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jan;67(1):1-13 [PMID: 15912869]
  30. Perception. 2005;34(2):155-62 [PMID: 15832566]
  31. Nature. 1996 Aug 8;382(6591):539-41 [PMID: 8700227]
  32. Vis Neurosci. 1993 Nov-Dec;10(6):1157-69 [PMID: 8257671]
  33. Neurosci Lett. 2004 May 27;362(3):176-81 [PMID: 15158008]
  34. Vision Res. 1984;24(1):55-62 [PMID: 6695508]
  35. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Dec;32(6):1380-97 [PMID: 17154779]
  36. J Neurosci. 1999 Jun 15;19(12):5074-84 [PMID: 10366640]
  37. Trends Neurosci. 1993 Jul;16(7):263-8 [PMID: 7689769]
  38. Nature. 1998 Oct 29;395(6705):894-6 [PMID: 9804421]
  39. Vision Res. 2003 Mar;43(6):629-37 [PMID: 12604099]
  40. Percept Psychophys. 1990 Jan;47(1):74-8 [PMID: 2300427]
  41. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Feb 13;98(4):2077-82 [PMID: 11172078]
  42. Vision Res. 1994 Sep;34(18):2425-30 [PMID: 7975281]
  43. Nature. 1982 Dec 9;300(5892):523-5 [PMID: 7144903]
  44. Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jul;4(7):739-44 [PMID: 11426231]
  45. Vision Res. 2005 Apr;45(9):1099-105 [PMID: 15707918]
  46. Vision Res. 1998 Dec;38(23):3743-58 [PMID: 9893804]
  47. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999 Jul;40(5):733-42 [PMID: 10433407]
  48. Nat Neurosci. 1999 Aug;2(8):733-9 [PMID: 10412063]
  49. Neuron. 1999 Sep;24(1):19-29, 111-25 [PMID: 10677024]
  50. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2001 Apr;107(1-3):69-94 [PMID: 11388143]
  51. Vision Res. 2005 Jul;45(16):2059-64 [PMID: 15845238]
  52. Curr Biol. 2005 May 10;15(9):R324-6 [PMID: 15886084]
  53. Nature. 2003 May 22;423(6938):401-8 [PMID: 12754524]

Grants

  1. R01 EY018216/NEI NIH HHS
  2. R01 EY018216-01/NEI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Attention
Cues
Discrimination, Psychological
Humans
Motion Perception
Photic Stimulation
Psychophysics
Sensory Thresholds

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0motiongloballocalspatialorientationattentionalscalescalesfeaturesthresholdsattentiondifferentperceivewhetherperceptionresourceSubjectsindividualGaborssubjectsattendedgloballydirectiondiscriminationvalidityprecueviceversaexperimentresultsinformationdefinedprocessingOneimportantaspectsvisualflexibility"window"cantunedallowinguslarge-scalepatternseffortlesslyinvestigatedcompetescommonviewedarraysmovinggroupproduceperceptlocallyhandidentifyuncrowdedrequireddevotetowardeitherdividemeasuredfunctionvariedoppositedirectionsvalidinvalidtrade-offincreasingprecuesonesimultaneouslyreducedincreasedsecondfoundsimilarpatternstatic-orientedGabors:Attendingimpairedsubjects'abilityThresholdshighercomparedhoweversuggestingfirstdrivenalonemotion-specificexperimentsdemonstratesharedflexiblymovesallowsimageSharedresources

Similar Articles

Cited By