Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: evidence from ORI case files.

Mark S Davis, Michelle Riske-Morris, Sebastian R Diaz
Author Information
  1. Mark S Davis: Criminal Justice Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. davis.198@sociology.osu.edu

Abstract

There has been relatively little empirical research into the causes of research misconduct. To begin to address this void, the authors collected data from closed case files of the Office of Research Integrity (ORI). These data were in the form of statements extracted from ORI file documents including transcripts, investigative reports, witness statements, and correspondence. Researchers assigned these statements to 44 different concepts. These concepts were then analyzed using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. The authors chose a solution consisting of seven clusters: (1) personal and professional stressors, (2) organizational climate, (3) job insecurities, (4) rationalizations A, (5) personal inhibitions, (6) rationalizations B and, (7) personality factors. The authors discuss the implications of their findings for policy and for future research.

References

  1. Nature. 1995 Oct 12;377(6549):474 [PMID: 7566137]
  2. Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Jan;5(1):119-22 [PMID: 11658010]
  3. J Higher Educ. 1994 May-Jun;65(3):373-83 [PMID: 11653368]
  4. Sci Eng Ethics. 1998 Apr;4(2):135-40 [PMID: 11657769]
  5. J Soc Behav Pers. 1995;10(2):281-91 [PMID: 15719502]
  6. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Dec;81(12):1679-81 [PMID: 10608378]
  7. Account Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;10(3):189-201 [PMID: 14979320]
  8. Perspect Biol Med. 1996 Winter;39(2):248-69 [PMID: 8820540]
  9. Account Res. 2005 Jul-Sep;12(3):207-24 [PMID: 16634172]
  10. New Sci. 1987 Aug 6;115(1572):62-3 [PMID: 11645775]
  11. Nature. 1989 May 11;339(6220):91-3 [PMID: 2716839]
  12. J Investig Med. 1997 Aug;45(6):371-80 [PMID: 9291693]
  13. Hastings Cent Rep. 1981 Oct;11(5):9-14 [PMID: 7309502]
  14. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992 Oct;15(8):536-41 [PMID: 1402414]
  15. J Prof Nurs. 1995 Sep-Oct;11(5):276-80 [PMID: 7593971]
  16. Br J Neurosurg. 2004 Aug;18(4):325-7 [PMID: 15702828]
  17. Ophthalmic Res. 2004 Jan-Feb;36(1):1-3 [PMID: 15007234]
  18. JAMA. 1993 Feb 17;269(7):895-7 [PMID: 8373455]
  19. Sci Eng Ethics. 1995 Oct;1(4):403-16 [PMID: 11657785]
  20. J Dent Res. 1994 Nov;73(11):1778-82 [PMID: 7983266]
  21. J Dent Res. 1994 Nov;73(11):1759-65 [PMID: 7983263]
  22. Am J Public Health. 1998 Jan;88(1):125-9 [PMID: 9584019]
  23. Fam Med. 1990 Mar-Apr;22(2):137-42 [PMID: 2182360]
  24. BMJ. 2004 Oct 30;329(7473):996 [PMID: 15514329]
  25. J Prof Nurs. 1991 May-Jun;7(3):166-71 [PMID: 2061524]
  26. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1997 Jan-Feb;31(1):90-4 [PMID: 9044207]
  27. Nurs Outlook. 2003 Sep-Oct;51(5):197-8 [PMID: 14596243]
  28. J Prof Nurs. 1995 Jan-Feb;11(1):31-9 [PMID: 7844280]
  29. J Intern Med. 1994 Feb;235(2):123-7 [PMID: 8308474]
  30. Nurs Outlook. 2003 Sep-Oct;51(5):239-41 [PMID: 14569231]
  31. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1991 Apr;25(2):89-94 [PMID: 2066936]
  32. J Adv Nurs. 1990 Aug;15(8):911-3 [PMID: 2229687]
  33. Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Apr;9(2):243-56 [PMID: 12774656]
  34. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Nov;23(6):799-800 [PMID: 7741488]

MeSH Term

Ethics, Research
Humans
Organizational Culture
Research Personnel
Scientific Misconduct
United States
United States Office of Research Integrity

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchauthorsORIstatementsdatacasefilesconceptspersonalrationalizationsfactorsrelativelylittleempiricalcausesmisconductbeginaddressvoidcollectedclosedOfficeResearchIntegrityformextractedfiledocumentsincludingtranscriptsinvestigativereportswitnesscorrespondenceResearchersassigned44differentanalyzedusingmultidimensionalscalingclusteranalysischosesolutionconsistingsevenclusters:1professionalstressors2organizationalclimate3jobinsecurities45inhibitions6B7personalitydiscussimplicationsfindingspolicyfutureCausalimplicatedmisconduct:evidence

Similar Articles

Cited By