The role of familiarity on modeling of eating and food consumption in children.

Sarah-Jeanne Salvy, Lenny R Vartanian, Jennifer S Coelho, Denise Jarrin, Patricia P Pliner
Author Information
  1. Sarah-Jeanne Salvy: Department of Pediatrics, Division of Behavioral Medicine, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214-3000, USA. ssalvy@buffalo.edu

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of peer and sibling influence on the cookie intake of normal-weight children. A total of 44 children (24 girls and 20 boys) aged 5-11 participated in this study. Children played a sorting task while being exposed to a large amount of cookies. Children were tested alone or with an unfamiliar peer or with a sibling. Results indicated that the social condition was related to the participants' energy intake. Children eating with their siblings ate more cookies than did children eating with strangers and also consumed more cookies than did children eating alone. This pattern of results is consistent with previous research in adults indicating that familiarity between co-eaters influence how much one choose to eat. Furthermore, the degree of intake matching was extremely high among strangers, but low and not statistically significant in dyads of siblings. We conclude that matching effect is not ubiquitous and that familiarity affects the level of matching of eating in children.

References

  1. Appetite. 2007 May;48(3):265-77 [PMID: 17157957]
  2. Physiol Behav. 2007 Dec 5;92(5):840-6 [PMID: 17628616]
  3. Obes Res. 2004 Nov;12(11):1711-22 [PMID: 15601964]
  4. Int J Eat Disord. 2001 Dec;30(4):447-53 [PMID: 11746306]
  5. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Apr;62(2):285-96 [PMID: 8201066]
  6. Appetite. 2007 Jul;49(1):92-9 [PMID: 17296248]
  7. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Oct;67(4):664-73 [PMID: 7965612]
  8. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Oct;53(4):693-702 [PMID: 3681647]
  9. Eat Behav. 2008 Apr;9(2):190-6 [PMID: 18329597]
  10. Appetite. 1991 Oct;17(2):129-40 [PMID: 1763905]
  11. Appetite. 2000 Feb;34(1):61-76 [PMID: 10744893]
  12. Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):933-44 [PMID: 7787006]
  13. Appetite. 2005 Dec;45(3):264-71 [PMID: 16239048]
  14. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990 Apr;35(4):923-31 [PMID: 2345766]
  15. Appetite. 2002 Dec;39(3):217-25 [PMID: 12495695]
  16. Appetite. 2007 Jul;49(1):177-82 [PMID: 17363109]
  17. Appetite. 1994 Aug;23(1):1-13 [PMID: 7826053]
  18. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983 Winter;16(4):371-8 [PMID: 6654769]
  19. Psychol Bull. 2003 Nov;129(6):873-86 [PMID: 14599286]
  20. Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8 [PMID: 18839484]
  21. Appetite. 1994 Jun;22(3):245-57 [PMID: 7979342]
  22. Physiol Behav. 1994 Sep;56(3):445-5 [PMID: 7972393]

Grants

  1. R03 HD056059/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R03 HD056059-01/NICHD NIH HHS
  3. HD056059A/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Child
Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Child, Preschool
Eating
Energy Intake
Feeding Behavior
Female
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Peer Group
Siblings
Social Behavior
Social Facilitation
Thinness

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0childreneatingintakeChildrencookiesfamiliaritymatchingstudypeersiblinginfluencealonesiblingsstrangersinvestigateseffectscookienormal-weighttotal4424girls20boysaged5-11participatedplayedsortingtaskexposedlargeamounttestedunfamiliarResultsindicatedsocialconditionrelatedparticipants'energyatealsoconsumedpatternresultsconsistentpreviousresearchadultsindicatingco-eatersmuchonechooseeatFurthermoredegreeextremelyhighamonglowstatisticallysignificantdyadsconcludeeffectubiquitousaffectslevelrolemodelingfoodconsumption

Similar Articles

Cited By