The effect of masker level uncertainty on intensity discrimination.

Emily Buss
Author Information
  1. Emily Buss: Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA. ebuss@med.unc.edu

Abstract

Thresholds were measured for detection of an increment in level of a 60-dB SPL target tone at 1 kHz, either in quiet or in the presence of maskers at 0.5 and 2 kHz. Interval-by-interval level rove applied independently to remote masker tones substantially elevated thresholds compared to intensity discrimination in quiet, an effect on the order of 10+dB [10 log(DeltaII)]. Asynchronous onset and stimulus envelope mismatches across frequency reduced but did not eliminate masking. A preinterval cue to signal frequency had no effect, but cuing masker frequency reduced thresholds, whether or not masker level was also cued. About 1 to 2 dB of threshold elevation in these conditions can be attributed to energetic masking. Decreasing the overall presentation level and increasing masker separation essentially eliminates energetic masking; under these conditions masker level rove elevates thresholds by approximately 7 dB when the target and masker tones are gated synchronously. This masking persists even when the flanking masker tones are presented contralateral to the target. Results suggest that observers tend to listen synthetically, even in conditions when this strategy reduces sensitivity to the intensity increment.

References

  1. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Jul;88(1):119-25 [PMID: 2380440]
  2. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Oct;102(4):2311-5 [PMID: 9348689]
  3. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Dec;90(6):3028-35 [PMID: 1787242]
  4. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 May;93(5):2896-902 [PMID: 8315153]
  5. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jan;103(1):535-41 [PMID: 9440338]
  6. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Dec;104(6):3489-99 [PMID: 9857508]
  7. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Dec;104(6):3500-10 [PMID: 9857509]
  8. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Mar;105(3):1831-40 [PMID: 10089606]
  9. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jun;121(6):3666-76 [PMID: 17552718]
  10. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Sep;122(3):EL69 [PMID: 17927310]
  11. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2001 Sep;2(3):189-98 [PMID: 11669393]
  12. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Nov;112(5 Pt 1):2099-109 [PMID: 12430821]
  13. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Jul;114(1):368-79 [PMID: 12880048]
  14. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Jan;115(1):289-300 [PMID: 14759022]
  15. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+ [PMID: 5541744]
  16. J Acoust Soc Am. 1981 Oct;70(4):1015-9 [PMID: 7288038]
  17. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Feb;75(2):536-44 [PMID: 6699291]
  18. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Jul;76(1):50-6 [PMID: 6747111]
  19. J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Apr;79(4):1045-53 [PMID: 3700859]
  20. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Mar;81(3):721-3 [PMID: 3584679]
  21. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 May;81(5):1519-27 [PMID: 3584689]
  22. Hear Res. 1988 Feb-Mar;32(2-3):147-63 [PMID: 3360675]
  23. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 May;83(5):1833-8 [PMID: 3403798]
  24. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Jul;84(1):144-9 [PMID: 3411041]
  25. J Acoust Soc Am. 1972 Apr;51(4):1265-9 [PMID: 5032942]
  26. J Acoust Soc Am. 1974 May;55(5):1049-54 [PMID: 4833697]
  27. Can J Psychol. 1978 Mar;32(1):19-31 [PMID: 728845]
  28. Hear Res. 1989 May;39(1-2):27-36 [PMID: 2737968]
  29. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Apr;87(4):1683-94 [PMID: 2341672]
  30. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Aug;94(2 Pt 1):748-58 [PMID: 8370881]
  31. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Feb;95(2):939-48 [PMID: 8132908]
  32. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Jun;95(6):3475-80 [PMID: 8046139]
  33. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Dec;96(6):3451-62 [PMID: 7814762]
  34. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Jul;98(1):125-34 [PMID: 7608391]
  35. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Oct;98(4):1909-20 [PMID: 7593915]
  36. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Oct;100(4 Pt 1):2289-98 [PMID: 8865636]
  37. Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:269-97 [PMID: 9046562]
  38. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 May;101(5 Pt 1):2811-21 [PMID: 9165735]
  39. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Apr;89(4 Pt 1):1816-8 [PMID: 2045588]

Grants

  1. R01 DC007391/NIDCD NIH HHS
  2. R01 DC007391-03/NIDCD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Auditory Perception
Auditory Threshold
Cues
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Perceptual Masking

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0maskerlevelmaskingtargettonesthresholdsintensityeffectfrequencyconditionsincrement1kHzquiet2rovediscriminationreduceddBenergeticevenThresholdsmeasureddetection60-dBSPLtoneeitherpresencemaskers05Interval-by-intervalappliedindependentlyremotesubstantiallyelevatedcomparedorder10+dB[10logDeltaII]AsynchronousonsetstimulusenvelopemismatchesacrosseliminatepreintervalcuesignalcuingwhetheralsocuedthresholdelevationcanattributedDecreasingoverallpresentationincreasingseparationessentiallyeliminateselevatesapproximately7gatedsynchronouslypersistsflankingpresentedcontralateralResultssuggestobserverstendlistensyntheticallystrategyreducessensitivityuncertainty

Similar Articles

Cited By