Neuropsychological assessment of attention in adults with different subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

L Tucha, O Tucha, R Laufkötter, S Walitza, H E Klein, K W Lange
Author Information
  1. L Tucha: School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Abstract

There is only little information about varying attention functions of adults with different DSM-IV subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In the present study groups of adult patients with ADHD - predominantly inattentive type, ADHD - predominantly hyperactive-impulsive type or ADHD - combined type and three healthy control groups were compared regarding multiple components of attention. Assessment of attention was performed using a computerized neuropsychological test battery for attentional functions. In comparison with healthy subjects, the three patient groups displayed impairments of vigilance, selective attention, divided attention, and flexibility. These impairments of attention of ADHD subgroups were primarily observed with regard to reaction time. With regard to tonic and phasic alertness no differences between patient and control groups could be found. Comparison between ADHD subgroups revealed that DSM-IV subtypes of ADHD differ in measures of divided attention, selective attention and flexibility. Differences between ADHD subgroups were primarily observed with regard to task accuracy. The results suggest that while distinct profiles of attentional functioning were observed between adult patients with ADHD and healthy adults indicating gross disturbances of various attention functions in patients with ADHD, differences between ADHD subgroups were only weak.

References

  1. Acta Neurol Scand. 1995 May;91(5):335-45 [PMID: 7639062]
  2. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001 Jun;23(3):317-30 [PMID: 11404810]
  3. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Mar;36(3):374-83 [PMID: 9055518]
  4. Neuroreport. 1998 Jan 5;9(1):121-6 [PMID: 9592060]
  5. J Child Neurol. 1993 Oct;8(4):339-47 [PMID: 8228029]
  6. Brain Lang. 1987 May;31(1):171-84 [PMID: 3580837]
  7. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Jun;931:172-95 [PMID: 11462741]
  8. Child Neuropsychol. 2000 Jun;6(2):101-14 [PMID: 16210207]
  9. Brain Cogn. 2001 Jun-Jul;46(1-2):114-21 [PMID: 11527308]
  10. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001 Jun;23(3):362-71 [PMID: 11404813]
  11. Neuropsychology. 2001 Apr;15(2):211-20 [PMID: 11324864]
  12. Clin Neuropsychol. 2002 Feb;16(1):12-34 [PMID: 11992223]
  13. Brain Cogn. 1987 Apr;6(2):175-83 [PMID: 3593557]
  14. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Jan;12(1):1-47 [PMID: 10769304]
  15. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 Jul;53(7):607-16 [PMID: 8660127]
  16. Neuropsychology. 1997 Oct;11(4):467-473 [PMID: 9345690]
  17. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998 Dec;186(12):776-81 [PMID: 9865816]
  18. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1988 Aug;16(4):361-78 [PMID: 3221028]
  19. J Consult Psychol. 1956 Oct;20(5):343-50 [PMID: 13367264]
  20. Arch Neurol. 1984 Aug;41(8):825-9 [PMID: 6331818]

MeSH Term

Adult
Arousal
Attention
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Female
Humans
Inhibition, Psychological
Male
Neuropsychological Tests

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ADHDattentiongroupssubgroupsfunctionsadultssubtypespatients-typehealthyobservedregarddifferentDSM-IVattention-deficit/hyperactivitydisorderadultpredominantlythreecontrolattentionalpatientimpairmentsselectivedividedflexibilityprimarilydifferenceslittleinformationvaryingpresentstudyinattentivehyperactive-impulsivecombinedcomparedregardingmultiplecomponentsAssessmentperformedusingcomputerizedneuropsychologicaltestbatterycomparisonsubjectsdisplayedvigilancereactiontimetonicphasicalertnessfoundComparisonrevealeddiffermeasuresDifferencestaskaccuracyresultssuggestdistinctprofilesfunctioningindicatinggrossdisturbancesvariousweakNeuropsychologicalassessment

Similar Articles

Cited By