Socioeconomic differences in obese patients with and without eating disorders.

H Bergström, K Elfhag
Author Information
  1. H Bergström: Obesity Unit M73, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden. helena.a.bergstrom@sll.se

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to evaluate whether there are any socioeconomic differences in obese patients with and without eating disorders.
METHOD: 567 obese participants referred to obesity treatment were divided into one eating-disordered group and one group without eating disorders. Those groups were compared regarding four socioeconomic variables: education, occupational status, daily occupation and housing area.
RESULTS: The prevalence of eating disorders in the sample was 9.8%. Female participants with an eating disorder (ED) had a higher BMI than female participants without an ED. Women with an ED were more often actively occupied, implying that they at the present time were working or studying, and they were also more frequently living in a lower income housing area. No statistically significant differences were found for education or occupational status.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that prevalence of eating disorders does not differ as a function of education or occupational status in patients referred to obesity treatment, but that differences in daily occupation and housing area can prevail for the women in particular.

References

  1. Int J Eat Disord. 2001 Mar;29(2):150-6 [PMID: 11429977]
  2. Health Care Women Int. 2001 Apr-May;22(3):281-98 [PMID: 11814073]
  3. Int J Eat Disord. 1999 Apr;25(3):287-92 [PMID: 10191993]
  4. Psychosom Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;65(4):701-8 [PMID: 12883125]
  5. Int J Eat Disord. 1994 Sep;16(2):147-57 [PMID: 7987349]
  6. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jun;58(6):846-52 [PMID: 15164104]
  7. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Oct;57(10):816-22 [PMID: 14573589]
  8. Compr Psychiatry. 2000 Mar-Apr;41(2):111-5 [PMID: 10741889]
  9. Int J Eat Disord. 1993 Mar;13(2):137-53 [PMID: 8477283]
  10. Int J Eat Disord. 1993 Nov;14(3):289-95 [PMID: 8275065]
  11. Int J Eat Disord. 2003 Dec;34(4):383-96 [PMID: 14566926]
  12. Int J Eat Disord. 2005 Nov;38(3):252-6 [PMID: 16211628]
  13. Int J Eat Disord. 1998 Jan;23(1):27-37 [PMID: 9429916]
  14. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 Apr;26(4):559-65 [PMID: 12075584]
  15. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005 Nov;25(7):895-916 [PMID: 16099563]
  16. Int J Eat Disord. 1997 Jul;22(1):15-23 [PMID: 9140731]
  17. Eat Weight Disord. 2004 Mar;9(1):44-9 [PMID: 15185833]
  18. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Jun;24(6):685-94 [PMID: 10878674]
  19. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001 Aug;104(2):122-30 [PMID: 11473506]
  20. Prev Med. 2002 Mar;34(3):299-309 [PMID: 11902846]
  21. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253 [PMID: 11234459]
  22. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18(3):227-34 [PMID: 12800947]
  23. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2007 Aug;55(4):285-95 [PMID: 17597326]
  24. Am J Public Health. 2002 Aug;92(8):1299-304 [PMID: 12144988]
  25. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Mar 1;137(5):569-76 [PMID: 8465808]

MeSH Term

Adult
Body Mass Index
Cross-Sectional Studies
Employment
Feeding and Eating Disorders
Female
Health Surveys
Humans
Middle Aged
Obesity
Poverty
Reference Values
Risk Factors
Social Environment
Socioeconomic Factors
Sweden

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0eatingdisordersdifferenceswithoutobesepatientsparticipantseducationoccupationalstatushousingareaEDpresentstudysocioeconomicreferredobesitytreatmentonegroupdailyoccupationprevalenceOBJECTIVE:aimsevaluatewhetherMETHOD:567dividedeating-disorderedgroupscomparedregardingfourvariables:RESULTS:sample98%FemaledisorderhigherBMIfemaleWomenoftenactivelyoccupiedimplyingtimeworkingstudyingalsofrequentlylivinglowerincomestatisticallysignificantfoundCONCLUSION:showsdifferfunctioncanprevailwomenparticularSocioeconomic

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.