Comparative analysis of the transcription-factor gene regulatory networks of E. coli and S. cerevisiae.

Lev Guzmán-Vargas, Moisés Santillán
Author Information
  1. Lev Guzmán-Vargas: Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria en Ingeniería y Tecnologías Avanzadas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av, IPN No, 2580, L, Ticomán, México D,F, 07340, México. lguzmanv@ipn.mx

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The regulatory interactions between transcription factors (TF) and regulated genes (RG) in a species genome can be lumped together in a single directed graph. The TF's and RG's conform the nodes of this graph, while links are drawn whenever a transcription factor regulates a gene's expression. Projections onto TF nodes can be constructed by linking every two nodes regulating a common gene. Similarly, projections onto RG nodes can be made by linking every two regulated genes sharing at least one common regulator. Recent studies of the connectivity pattern in the transcription-factor regulatory network of many organisms have revealed some interesting properties. However, the differences between TF and RG nodes have not been widely explored.
RESULTS: After analysing the RG and TF projections of the transcription-factor gene regulatory networks of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we found several common characteristic as well as some noticeable differences. To better understand these differences, we compared the properties of the E. coli and S. cerevisiae RG- and TF-projected networks with those of the corresponding projections built from randomized versions of the original bipartite networks. These last results indicate that the observed differences are mostly due to the very different ratios of TF to RG counts of the E. coli and S. cerevisiae bipartite networks, rather than to their having different connectivity patterns.
CONCLUSION: Since E. coli is a prokaryotic organism while S. cerevisiae is eukaryotic, there are important differences between them concerning processing of mRNA before translation, DNA packing, amount of junk DNA, and gene regulation. From the results in this paper we conclude that the most important effect such differences have had on the development of the corresponding transcription-factor gene regulatory networks is their very different ratios of TF to RG numbers. This ratio is more than three times larger in S. cerevisiae than in E. coli. Our calculations reveal that, both species' gene regulatory networks have very similar connectivity patterns, despite their very different TF to RG ratios. An this, to our consideration, indicates that the structure of both networks is optimal from an evolutionary viewpoint.

References

  1. J Mol Biol. 2006 Jun 30;360(1):204-12 [PMID: 16730024]
  2. Nature. 2000 Jul 27;406(6794):378-82 [PMID: 10935628]
  3. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2004 Jun;14(3):283-91 [PMID: 15193307]
  4. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Dec 16;32(22):6643-9 [PMID: 15604458]
  5. Phys Rev Lett. 2001 Nov 5;87(19):198701 [PMID: 11690461]
  6. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 30;5:10 [PMID: 15018656]
  7. Nat Genet. 2002 May;31(1):60-3 [PMID: 11967534]
  8. Bioinformatics. 2006 Mar 1;22(5):581-8 [PMID: 16403796]
  9. Nat Genet. 2002 May;31(1):64-8 [PMID: 11967538]
  10. FEBS J. 2005 Dec;272(24):6423-34 [PMID: 16336278]
  11. J R Soc Interface. 2005 Dec 22;2(5):419-30 [PMID: 16849202]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 31;102(22):7841-6 [PMID: 15908506]
  13. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D394-7 [PMID: 16381895]
  14. J R Soc Interface. 2006 Feb 22;3(6):185-96 [PMID: 16849230]

MeSH Term

Escherichia coli
Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal
Gene Regulatory Networks
Genes, Bacterial
Genes, Fungal
Models, Genetic
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Transcription Factors

Chemicals

Transcription Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0networksTFRGregulatorygenedifferencescolicerevisiaenodesEStranscription-factordifferentcancommonprojectionsconnectivityratiostranscriptionregulatedgenesgraphontolinkingeverytwopropertiescorrespondingbipartiteresultspatternsimportantDNABACKGROUND:interactionsfactorsspeciesgenomelumpedtogethersingledirectedTF'sRG'sconformlinksdrawnwheneverfactorregulatesgene'sexpressionProjectionsconstructedregulatingSimilarlymadesharingleastoneregulatorRecentstudiespatternnetworkmanyorganismsrevealedinterestingHoweverwidelyexploredRESULTS:analysingEscherichiaSaccharomycesfoundseveralcharacteristicwellnoticeablebetterunderstandcomparedRG-TF-projectedbuiltrandomizedversionsoriginallastindicateobservedmostlyduecountsratherCONCLUSION:SinceprokaryoticorganismeukaryoticconcerningprocessingmRNAtranslationpackingamountjunkregulationpaperconcludeeffectdevelopmentnumbersratiothreetimeslargercalculationsrevealspecies'similardespiteconsiderationindicatesstructureoptimalevolutionaryviewpointComparativeanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By (6)