Qualitative dosimetric and radiobiological evaluation of high - dose - rate interstitial brachytherapy implants.

Than S Kehwar, Syed F Akber, Kamlesh Passi
Author Information
  1. Than S Kehwar: Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Abstract

Radiation quality indices (QI), tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability(NTCP) were evaluated for ideal single and double plane HDR interstitial implants. In the analysis, geometrically-optimized at volume (GOV) treatment plans were generated for different values of inter-source-spacing (ISS) within the catheter, inter-catheter-spacing (ICS), and inter-plane-spacing (IPS) for single - and double - plane implants. The dose volume histograms (DVH) were generated for each plan, and the coverage volumes of 100%, 150%, and 200% were obtained to calculate QIs, TCP, and NTCP. Formulae for biologically effective equivalent uniform dose (BEEUD), for tumor and normal tissues, were derived to calculate TCP and NTCP. Optimal values of QIs, except external volume index (EI), and TCP were obtained at ISS = 1.0 cm, and ICS = 1.0 cm, for single-plane implants, and ISS = 1.0 cm, ICS = 1.0 cm, and IPS = 0.75 to 1.25 cm, for double - plane implants. From this study, it is assessed that ISS = 1.0 cm, ICS = 1.0 cm, for single - plane implant and IPS between 0.75 cm to 1.25 cm provide better dose conformity and uniformity.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Jan 15;34(2):497-505 [PMID: 8567354]
  2. Radiother Oncol. 1997 Oct;45(1):71-6 [PMID: 9364634]
  3. Radiother Oncol. 1994 Jun;31(3):229-39 [PMID: 8066206]
  4. Acta Radiol Oncol Radiat Phys Biol. 1978;17(1):33-48 [PMID: 696400]
  5. J Cancer Res Ther. 2005 Jul-Sep;1(3):168-79 [PMID: 17998649]
  6. Br J Radiol. 1995 Apr;68(808):H60-100; discussion H59 [PMID: 7795966]
  7. Radiother Oncol. 2000 Mar;54(3):213-20 [PMID: 10738079]
  8. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991 May 15;21(1):109-22 [PMID: 2032882]
  9. Phys Med Biol. 1993 Jun;38(6):653-66 [PMID: 8346278]
  10. Int J Radiat Biol. 1992 Aug;62(2):249-62 [PMID: 1355519]
  11. Med Phys. 1983 Jul-Aug;10(4):456-61 [PMID: 6888357]
  12. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 May 1;44(2):439-47 [PMID: 10760441]
  13. Phys Med Biol. 1994 Nov;39(11):2091-8 [PMID: 15560013]
  14. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993 Jun 15;26(3):519-27 [PMID: 8514547]
  15. Phys Med Biol. 1995 Oct;40(10):1735-8 [PMID: 8532753]
  16. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985 Dec;11(12):2163-70 [PMID: 4066449]
  17. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985 Jun;11(6):1225-7 [PMID: 3997604]
  18. Med Phys. 1988 May-Jun;15(3):391-6 [PMID: 3405143]
  19. Acta Oncol. 1988;27(2):117-22 [PMID: 3390342]
  20. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jan 15;40(2):515-24 [PMID: 9457842]
  21. Br J Radiol. 1989 Aug;62(740):679-94 [PMID: 2670032]
  22. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991 Jan;20(1):135-9 [PMID: 1993622]

MeSH Term

Brachytherapy
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Humans
Models, Biological
Neoplasms
Radiation Dosage

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cm10=implants-doseTCPplanevolumeISSICSNTCPsingledoubleinterstitialIPSqualityindicestumorprobabilitynormalHDRgeneratedvaluesinter-source-spacinginter-catheter-spacingobtainedcalculateQIsbiologicallyeffectiveequivalentuniform7525RadiationQIcontroltissuecomplicationevaluatedidealanalysisgeometrically-optimizedGOVtreatmentplansdifferentwithincatheterinter-plane-spacinghistogramsDVHplancoveragevolumes100%150%200%FormulaeBEEUDtissuesderivedOptimalexceptexternalindexEIsingle-planestudyassessedimplantprovidebetterconformityuniformityQualitativedosimetricradiobiologicalevaluationhighratebrachytherapygeometricaloptimization

Similar Articles

Cited By (6)