Ultrasound evaluation in combination with finger extension force measurements of the forearm musculus extensor digitorum communis in healthy subjects.

Sofia Brorsson, Anna Nilsdotter, Marita Hilliges, Christer Sollerman, Ylva Aurell
Author Information
  1. Sofia Brorsson: PRODEA research group, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden. sofia.olandersson@set.hh.se

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of an ultrasound-based method of examining extensor muscle architecture, especially the parameters important for force development. This paper presents the combination of two non-invasive methods for studying the extensor muscle architecture using ultrasound simultaneously with finger extension force measurements.
METHODS: M. extensor digitorum communis (EDC) was examined in 40 healthy subjects, 20 women and 20 men, aged 35-73 years. Ultrasound measurements were made in a relaxed position of the hand as well as in full contraction. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), pennation angle and contraction patterns were measured with ultrasound, and muscle volume and fascicle length were also estimated. Finger extension force was measured using a newly developed finger force measurement device.
RESULTS: The following muscle parameters were determined: CSA, circumference, thickness, pennation angles and changes in shape of the muscle CSA. The mean EDC volume in men was 28.3 cm3 and in women 16.6 cm3. The mean CSA was 2.54 cm2 for men and 1.84 cm2 for women. The mean pennation angle for men was 6.5 degrees and for women 5.5 degrees . The mean muscle thickness for men was 1.2 cm and for women 0.76 cm. The mean fascicle length for men was 7.3 cm and for women 5.0 cm. Significant differences were found between men and women regarding EDC volume (p < 0.001), CSA (p < 0.001), pennation angle (p < 0.05), muscle thickness (p < 0.001), fascicle length (p < 0.001) and finger force (p < 0.001). Changes in the shape of muscle architecture during contraction were more pronounced in men than women (p < 0.01). The mean finger extension force for men was 96.7 N and for women 39.6 N. Muscle parameters related to the extension force differed between men and women. For men the muscle volume and muscle CSA were related to extension force, while for women muscle thickness was related to the extension force.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound is a useful tool for studying muscle architectures in EDC. Muscle parameters of importance for force development were identified. Knowledge concerning the correlation between muscle dynamics and force is of importance for the development of new hand training programmes and rehabilitation after surgery.

References

  1. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 [PMID: 2868172]
  2. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Mar;88(3):851-6 [PMID: 10710378]
  3. J Physiol. 1998 Oct 15;512 ( Pt 2):603-14 [PMID: 9763648]
  4. J Anat. 2001 Oct;199(Pt 4):429-34 [PMID: 11693303]
  5. J Physiol. 1983 May;338:37-49 [PMID: 6875963]
  6. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Feb;(383):140-51 [PMID: 11210948]
  7. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 Nov;81(5):2173-81 [PMID: 8941543]
  8. J Physiol. 2001 Jul 15;534(Pt. 2):613-23 [PMID: 11454977]
  9. J Biomech. 2007;40(11):2442-9 [PMID: 17250841]
  10. J Biomech. 1981;14(10):659-69 [PMID: 7334026]
  11. Cells Tissues Organs. 2000;167(2-3):214-22 [PMID: 10971045]
  12. J Hand Surg Am. 1990 Mar;15(2):244-50 [PMID: 2324452]
  13. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jun;85(6):980-6 [PMID: 15179654]
  14. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997 Jan;82(1):354-8 [PMID: 9029238]
  15. Muscle Nerve. 2007 Jan;35(1):78-86 [PMID: 17039464]
  16. Med Eng Phys. 2006 Jun;28(5):405-15 [PMID: 16115790]
  17. Muscle Nerve. 2000 Nov;23(11):1647-66 [PMID: 11054744]
  18. J Clin Ultrasound. 2005 Jun;33(5):207-13 [PMID: 16047388]
  19. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Dec;65(12):1613-9 [PMID: 16728462]
  20. Stroke. 2000 Jun;31(6):1360-4 [PMID: 10835457]
  21. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Jul;30(7):1066-70 [PMID: 9662674]
  22. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Apr;72(5):280-3 [PMID: 2009042]
  23. J Morphol. 1993 Nov;218(2):167-80 [PMID: 8263946]
  24. J Biomech. 1990;23(1):91-5 [PMID: 2307696]
  25. J Hand Surg Am. 2002 Sep;27(5):886-96 [PMID: 12239681]
  26. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992;65(5):433-7 [PMID: 1425649]
  27. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Aug;21(7):701-9 [PMID: 16621210]
  28. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Jan;35(1):39-44 [PMID: 12544633]
  29. Int J Sports Med. 2001 Apr;22(3):186-91 [PMID: 11354521]
  30. J Biomech. 1997 May;30(5):457-63 [PMID: 9109557]
  31. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998 Jul;78(2):109-14 [PMID: 9694308]
  32. Med Eng Phys. 2007 May;29(4):472-9 [PMID: 16908212]
  33. Acta Physiol Scand. 2005 Mar;183(3):291-8 [PMID: 15743389]
  34. Acta Physiol Scand. 2001 Aug;172(4):249-55 [PMID: 11531646]
  35. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Aug;85(2):398-404 [PMID: 9688711]
  36. J Biomech. 2007;40(4):742-9 [PMID: 17241636]
  37. Clin Physiol. 1985 Apr;5(2):145-54 [PMID: 3888498]
  38. J Hand Surg Am. 1992 Sep;17(5):804-9 [PMID: 1401784]
  39. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 [PMID: 843571]
  40. Acta Radiol. 2004 Oct;45(6):622-7 [PMID: 15587419]
  41. J Hand Surg Am. 1996 May;21(3):402-5 [PMID: 8724469]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Female
Forearm
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle Contraction
Muscle, Skeletal
Statistics, Nonparametric
Ultrasonography

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0muscleforcewomenmen0extensionp<CSAmeanfinger001extensorparametersEDCpennationvolumethickness5cmarchitecturedevelopmentmeasurementsUltrasoundcontractionMuscleanglefasciclelength6relatedcombinationstudyingusingultrasounddigitorumcommunishealthysubjects20handmeasuredshape3cm32cm21degrees7NimportanceBACKGROUND:aimstudyevaluateusefulnessultrasound-basedmethodexaminingespeciallyimportantpaperpresentstwonon-invasivemethodssimultaneouslyMETHODS:Mexamined40aged35-73yearsmaderelaxedpositionwellfullcross-sectionalareapatternsalsoestimatedFingernewlydevelopedmeasurementdeviceRESULTS:followingdetermined:circumferenceangleschanges2816548476Significantdifferencesfoundregarding05Changespronounced019639differedCONCLUSION:usefultoolarchitecturesidentifiedKnowledgeconcerningcorrelationdynamicsnewtrainingprogrammesrehabilitationsurgeryevaluationforearmmusculus

Similar Articles

Cited By