Semantic contribution to verbal short-term memory: are pleasant words easier to remember than neutral words in serial recall and serial recognition?

Catherine Monnier, Arielle Syssau
Author Information
  1. Catherine Monnier: Département de Psychologie, Université Paul Valéry, Montpellier, France. catherine.monnier@univ-montp3.fr

Abstract

In the four experiments reported here, we examined the role of word pleasantness on immediate serial recall and immediate serial recognition. In Experiment 1, we compared verbal serial recall of pleasant and neutral words, using a limited set of items. In Experiment 2, we replicated Experiment 1 with an open set of words (i.e., new items were used on every trial). In Experiments 3 and 4, we assessed immediate serial recognition of pleasant and neutral words, using item sets from Experiments 1 and 2. Pleasantness was found to have a facilitation effect on both immediate serial recall and immediate serial recognition. This study supplies some new supporting arguments in favor of a semantic contribution to verbal short-term memory performance. The pleasantness effect observed in immediate serial recognition showed that, contrary to a number of earlier findings, performance on this task can also turn out to be dependent on semantic factors. The results are discussed in relation to nonlinguistic and psycholinguistic models of short-term memory.

References

  1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Jun;7(2):332-40 [PMID: 10909142]
  2. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1995 May;48(2):384-404 [PMID: 7610273]
  3. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005;9(3):184-211 [PMID: 16083360]
  4. Psychol Rev. 1998 Jan;105(1):158-73 [PMID: 9450375]
  5. Learn Mem. 1995 May-Aug;2(3-4):107-32 [PMID: 10467570]
  6. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):171-7 [PMID: 15945210]
  7. Mem Cognit. 1990 May;18(3):251-69 [PMID: 2192233]
  8. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1019-34 [PMID: 12450329]
  9. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1977 Sep;35(9):677-88 [PMID: 909043]
  10. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:53-81 [PMID: 11752479]
  11. J Exp Psychol. 1955 Nov;50(5):325-38 [PMID: 13271697]
  12. Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Mar;1(1):122-5 [PMID: 24203421]
  13. Am Psychol. 1981 Feb;36(2):129-48 [PMID: 7224324]
  14. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):79-88 [PMID: 16478342]
  15. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004 Mar 1;21(2):213-28 [PMID: 21038201]
  16. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Jun;129(2):242-61 [PMID: 10868336]
  17. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 May;59(5):949-64 [PMID: 16608756]
  18. Psychol Bull. 1993 Jul;114(1):3-28 [PMID: 8346328]
  19. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Sep;23(5):1217-32 [PMID: 9293631]
  20. J Cogn Neurosci. 1994 Winter;6(1):57-69 [PMID: 23962330]
  21. Emotion. 2001 Mar;1(1):5-11 [PMID: 12894807]
  22. Mem Cognit. 1993 Mar;21(2):168-75 [PMID: 8469125]
  23. Can J Exp Psychol. 1996 Dec;50(4):408-12 [PMID: 9025332]
  24. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(2):125-42 [PMID: 10660225]
  25. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1999 May;52(2):367-94 [PMID: 10428684]
  26. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 Feb;54(1):1-30 [PMID: 11216312]
  27. Mem Cognit. 1997 Mar;25(2):256-63 [PMID: 9099075]

MeSH Term

Adult
Affect
Female
Humans
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Mental Recall
Recognition, Psychology
Semantics
Verbal Behavior

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0serialimmediatewordsrecallrecognitionExperiment1verbalpleasantneutralshort-termpleasantnessusingsetitems2newExperimentseffectsemanticcontributionmemoryperformancefourexperimentsreportedexaminedrolewordcomparedlimitedreplicatedopenieusedeverytrial34assesseditemsetsPleasantnessfoundfacilitationstudysuppliessupportingargumentsfavorobservedshowedcontrarynumberearlierfindingstaskcanalsoturndependentfactorsresultsdiscussedrelationnonlinguisticpsycholinguisticmodelsSemanticmemory:easierrememberrecognition?

Similar Articles

Cited By