Acute disinhibiting effects of alcohol as a factor in risky driving behavior.

Mark T Fillmore, Jaime S Blackburn, Emily L R Harrison
Author Information
  1. Mark T Fillmore: Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA. fillmore@uky.edu

Abstract

Automobile crash reports show that up to 40% of fatal crashes in the United States involve alcohol and that younger drivers are over-represented. Alcohol use among young drivers is associated with impulsive and risky driving behaviors, such as speeding, which could contribute to their over-representation in alcohol-related crash statistics. Recent laboratory studies show that alcohol increases impulsive behaviors by impairing the drinker's ability to inhibit inappropriate actions and that this effect can be exacerbated in conflict situations where the expression and inhibition of behavior are equally motivating. The present study tested the hypothesis that this response conflict might also intensify the disruptive effects of alcohol on driving performance. Fourteen subjects performed a simulated driving and a cued go/no-go task that measured their inhibitory control. Conflict was motivated in these tasks by providing equal monetary incentives for slow, careful behavior (e.g., slow driving, inhibiting impulses) and for quick, abrupt behavior (fast driving, disinhibition). Subjects were tested under two alcohol doses (0.65 g/kg and a placebo) that were administered twice: when conflict was present and when conflict was absent. Alcohol interacted with conflict to impair inhibitory control and to increase risky and impaired driving behavior on the drive task. Also, individuals whose inhibitory control was most impaired by alcohol displayed the poorest driving performance under the drug. The study demonstrates potentially serious disruptions to driving performance as a function of alcohol intoxication and response conflict, and points to inhibitory control as an important underlying mechanism.

References

  1. Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan;121(1):66-95 [PMID: 24490789]
  2. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Dec;15(6):588-98 [PMID: 18179312]
  3. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999 Feb;7(1):49-55 [PMID: 10036609]
  4. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;67(4):567-74 [PMID: 16669721]
  5. J Stud Alcohol. 1997 Nov;58(6):600-5 [PMID: 9391919]
  6. J Stud Alcohol. 1983 May;44(3):395-428 [PMID: 6645522]
  7. Accid Anal Prev. 2004 Jan;36(1):49-61 [PMID: 14572827]
  8. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985 Jan;48(1):18-34 [PMID: 3981386]
  9. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003 Feb;11(1):110-7 [PMID: 12622349]
  10. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Oct;146(4):373-90 [PMID: 10550488]
  11. Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Nov;37(6):973-82 [PMID: 15921652]
  12. Q J Stud Alcohol. 1956 Jun;17(2):296-305 [PMID: 13336262]
  13. Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Sep;37(5):882-9 [PMID: 15907777]
  14. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Nov;13(4):327-35 [PMID: 16366763]
  15. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002 Jul;8(5):655-72 [PMID: 12164675]
  16. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1021:1-22 [PMID: 15251869]
  17. Behav Neurosci. 2000 Aug;114(4):830-7 [PMID: 10959541]
  18. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Feb;13(1):15-24 [PMID: 15727499]
  19. J Stud Alcohol. 2005 Sep;66(5):663-72 [PMID: 16331852]
  20. J Stud Alcohol. 1998 Nov;59(6):723-30 [PMID: 9811094]
  21. Accid Anal Prev. 2001 Sep;33(5):679-84 [PMID: 11491249]
  22. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Aug;112(3):424-36 [PMID: 12943021]
  23. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1979 Mar 28;61(3):287-91 [PMID: 109893]
  24. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2003 Sep;2(3):179-97 [PMID: 15006292]
  25. J Stud Alcohol. 2000 Mar;61(2):239-46 [PMID: 10757134]
  26. Pediatrics. 1996 Dec;98(6 Pt 1):1089-95 [PMID: 8951258]
  27. Q J Stud Alcohol. 1972 Jun;33(2):358-78 [PMID: 5033136]
  28. J Stud Alcohol. 2003 Sep;64(5):687-95 [PMID: 14572191]
  29. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25 [PMID: 7367577]
  30. J Abnorm Psychol. 1994 May;103(2):293-301 [PMID: 8040499]
  31. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007 Aug;32(7):745-59 [PMID: 17442694]
  32. J Clin Psychol. 1995 Nov;51(6):768-74 [PMID: 8778124]
  33. J Stud Alcohol. 1975 Jan;36(1):117-26 [PMID: 238068]
  34. Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Jul;37(4):619-24 [PMID: 15949452]
  35. Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Mar;38(2):215-24 [PMID: 16256932]
  36. Addict Behav. 1989;14(4):477-83 [PMID: 2782130]
  37. J Abnorm Psychol. 1994 Feb;103(1):92-102 [PMID: 8040486]
  38. Psychol Bull. 1997 Jan;121(1):65-94 [PMID: 9000892]
  39. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;39(1):65-99 [PMID: 9534087]
  40. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1991 Jun;76(3):241-92 [PMID: 1927576]

Grants

  1. R01 AA012895-05/NIAAA NIH HHS
  2. R21 DA021027-01/NIDA NIH HHS
  3. R01 AA12895/NIAAA NIH HHS
  4. R21 DA021027-02/NIDA NIH HHS
  5. R01 AA012895-05S1/NIAAA NIH HHS
  6. R21 DA021027/NIDA NIH HHS
  7. R21 DA021027-02S1/NIDA NIH HHS
  8. R01 AA012895/NIAAA NIH HHS
  9. R21 DA021027-03/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Accidents, Traffic
Adult
Alcoholic Intoxication
Automobile Driving
Computer Simulation
Conflict, Psychological
Female
Humans
Impulsive Behavior
Inhibition, Psychological
Male
Motivation
Orientation
Reaction Time
Risk-Taking

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0drivingalcoholconflictbehaviorinhibitorycontrolriskyperformancecrashshowdriversAlcoholimpulsivebehaviorspresentstudytestedresponseeffectstaskslowimpairedAutomobilereports40%fatalcrashesUnitedStatesinvolveyoungerover-representeduseamongyoungassociatedspeedingcontributeover-representationalcohol-relatedstatisticsRecentlaboratorystudiesincreasesimpairingdrinker'sabilityinhibitinappropriateactionseffectcanexacerbatedsituationsexpressioninhibitionequallymotivatinghypothesismightalsointensifydisruptiveFourteensubjectsperformedsimulatedcuedgo/no-gomeasuredConflictmotivatedtasksprovidingequalmonetaryincentivescarefuleginhibitingimpulsesquickabruptfastdisinhibitionSubjectstwodoses065g/kgplaceboadministeredtwice:absentinteractedimpairincreasedriveAlsoindividualswhosedisplayedpoorestdrugdemonstratespotentiallyseriousdisruptionsfunctionintoxicationpointsimportantunderlyingmechanismAcutedisinhibitingfactor

Similar Articles

Cited By