On the primacy of molecular processes in determining response rates under variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.

Takayuki Tanno, Takayuki Sakagami
Author Information
  1. Takayuki Tanno: Department of Psychology, Keio University, 1545, Mita 2 chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8345, Japan. tantantan@m2.dion.ne.jp

Abstract

This study focused on variables that may account for response-rate differences under variable-ratio (VR) and variable-interval (VI) schedules of reinforcement. Four rats were exposed to VR, VI, tandem VI differential-reinforcement-of-high-rate, regulated-probability-interval, and negative-feedback schedules of reinforcement that provided the same rate of reinforcement. Response rates were higher under the VR schedule than the VI schedule, and the rates on all other schedules approximated those under the VR schedule. The median reinforced interresponse time (IRT) under the VI schedule was longer than for the other schedules. Thus, differences in reinforced IRTs correlated with differences in response rate, an outcome suggestive of the molecular control of response rate. This conclusion was complemented by the additional finding that the differences in molar reinforcement-feedback functions had little discernible impact on responding.

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):331-8 [PMID: 16812543]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):471-86 [PMID: 16811962]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 May;71(3):319-28 [PMID: 16812898]
  4. Learn Behav. 2006 Nov;34(4):379-86 [PMID: 17330529]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):247-74 [PMID: 11453618]
  6. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Oct;26(4):416-27 [PMID: 11056882]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):387-403 [PMID: 16812255]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 May;27(3):453-67 [PMID: 16812006]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):441-51 [PMID: 16812732]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):403-11 [PMID: 16811364]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Jan;85(1):57-71 [PMID: 16602376]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529-30 [PMID: 13945507]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):Suppl:327-83 [PMID: 5672248]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Nov;48(3):367-81 [PMID: 16812498]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 May;73(3):241-60 [PMID: 10866350]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 May;13(3):369-74 [PMID: 16811450]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Mar;79(2):157-73 [PMID: 12822684]
  18. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Sep;28(2):155-61 [PMID: 16812022]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Mar;59(2):245-64 [PMID: 16812686]
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):315-29 [PMID: 3805974]
  21. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Sep;42(2):337-48 [PMID: 6502069]
  22. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1990 Aug;42(3):225-39 [PMID: 2236636]

MeSH Term

Animals
Conditioning, Operant
Feedback, Psychological
Male
Probability Learning
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Reinforcement Schedule

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0VIschedulesdifferencesVRschedulereinforcementrateratesresponsevariable-ratiovariable-intervalreinforcedmolecularstudyfocusedvariablesmayaccountresponse-rateFourratsexposedtandemdifferential-reinforcement-of-high-rateregulated-probability-intervalnegative-feedbackprovidedResponsehigherapproximatedmedianinterresponsetimeIRTlongerThusIRTscorrelatedoutcomesuggestivecontrolconclusioncomplementedadditionalfindingmolarreinforcement-feedbackfunctionslittlediscernibleimpactrespondingprimacyprocessesdetermining

Similar Articles

Cited By