Cooperative problem solving in rooks (Corvus frugilegus).

Amanda M Seed, Nicola S Clayton, Nathan J Emery
Author Information
  1. Amanda M Seed: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK. seed@eva.mpg.de

Abstract

Recent work has shown that captive rooks, like chimpanzees and other primates, develop cooperative alliances with their conspecifics. Furthermore, the pressures hypothesized to have favoured social intelligence in primates also apply to corvids. We tested cooperative problem-solving in rooks to compare their performance and cognition with primates. Without training, eight rooks quickly solved a problem in which two individuals had to pull both ends of a string simultaneously in order to pull in a food platform. Similar to chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys, performance was better when within-dyad tolerance levels were higher. In contrast to chimpanzees, rooks did not delay acting on the apparatus while their partner gained access to the test room. Furthermore, given a choice between an apparatus that could be operated individually over one that required the action of two individuals, four out of six individuals showed no preference. These results may indicate that cooperation in chimpanzees is underpinned by more complex cognitive processes than that in rooks. Such a difference may arise from the fact that while both chimpanzees and rooks form cooperative alliances, chimpanzees, but not rooks, live in a variable social network made up of competitive and cooperative relationships.

References

  1. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989 Apr;78(4):547-73 [PMID: 2540662]
  2. Anim Cogn. 2004 Apr;7(2):69-76 [PMID: 15069605]
  3. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):507-22 [PMID: 17309867]
  4. Science. 2004 Dec 10;306(5703):1903-7 [PMID: 15591194]
  5. Curr Biol. 2006 Apr 4;16(7):697-701 [PMID: 16581516]
  6. Science. 2006 Mar 3;311(5765):1297-300 [PMID: 16513985]
  7. Anim Behav. 2000 Oct;60(4):523-529 [PMID: 11032655]
  8. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Feb;8(2):60-5 [PMID: 15588809]
  9. Anim Behav. 1997 Nov;54(5):1215-25 [PMID: 9398374]
  10. Primates. 2007 Jan;48(1):13-21 [PMID: 17103081]
  11. Curr Biol. 2007 Apr 3;17(7):619-23 [PMID: 17346970]
  12. Anim Cogn. 2007 Apr;10(2):225-31 [PMID: 17171360]
  13. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):489-505 [PMID: 17255008]
  14. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Aug 22;272(1573):1641-6 [PMID: 16087417]
  15. Curr Biol. 2009 Apr 14;19(7):602-6 [PMID: 19345101]
  16. Curr Biol. 2007 Jan 23;17(2):152-8 [PMID: 17240341]
  17. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):639-48 [PMID: 17296598]
  18. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jul 7;271(1546):1331-6 [PMID: 15306330]
  19. Science. 2006 Jun 16;312(5780):1662-5 [PMID: 16709747]
  20. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Sep;9(9):439-44 [PMID: 16061417]
  21. Nature. 1998 Sep 17;395(6699):272-4 [PMID: 9751053]
  22. Anim Behav. 2005 Jan;69(1):133-142 [PMID: 16804561]
  23. Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Oct;28(5):675-91; discussion 691-735 [PMID: 16262930]
  24. J Comp Psychol. 2000 Sep;114(3):297-301 [PMID: 10994846]

Grants

  1. BBS/B/05354/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

MeSH Term

Animals
Behavior, Animal
Cognition
Cooperative Behavior
Crows
Female
Male
Pan troglodytes
Statistics, Nonparametric

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0rookschimpanzeescooperativeprimatesindividualsalliancesFurthermoresocialperformanceproblemtwopullapparatusmayRecentworkshowncaptivelikedevelopconspecificspressureshypothesizedfavouredintelligencealsoapplycorvidstestedproblem-solvingcomparecognitionWithouttrainingeightquicklysolvedendsstringsimultaneouslyorderfoodplatformSimilarcapuchinmonkeysbetterwithin-dyadtolerancelevelshighercontrastdelayactingpartnergainedaccesstestroomgivenchoiceoperatedindividuallyonerequiredactionfoursixshowedpreferenceresultsindicatecooperationunderpinnedcomplexcognitiveprocessesdifferencearisefactformlivevariablenetworkmadecompetitiverelationshipsCooperativesolvingCorvusfrugilegus

Similar Articles

Cited By (60)