Transcriptome architecture across tissues in the pig.

André L J Ferraz, Ana Ojeda, Manel López-Béjar, Lana T Fernandes, Anna Castelló, Josep M Folch, Miguel Pérez-Enciso
Author Information
  1. André L J Ferraz: Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain. splinter_zoo2@yahoo.com.br

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial selection has resulted in animal breeds with extreme phenotypes. As an organism is made up of many different tissues and organs, each with its own genetic programme, it is pertinent to ask: How relevant is tissue in terms of total transcriptome variability? Which are the genes most distinctly expressed between tissues? Does breed or sex equally affect the transcriptome across tissues?
RESULTS: In order to gain insight on these issues, we conducted microarray expression profiling of 16 different tissues from four animals of two extreme pig breeds, Large White and Iberian, two males and two females. Mixed model analysis and neighbor - joining trees showed that tissues with similar developmental origin clustered closer than those with different embryonic origins. Often a sound biological interpretation was possible for overrepresented gene ontology categories within differentially expressed genes between groups of tissues. For instance, an excess of nervous system or muscle development genes were found among tissues of ectoderm or mesoderm origins, respectively. Tissue accounted for ~11 times more variability than sex or breed. Nevertheless, we were able to confidently identify genes with differential expression across tissues between breeds (33 genes) and between sexes (19 genes). The genes primarily affected by sex were overall different than those affected by breed or tissue. Interaction with tissue can be important for differentially expressed genes between breeds but not so much for genes whose expression differ between sexes.
CONCLUSION: Embryonic development leaves an enduring footprint on the transcriptome. The interaction in gene x tissue for differentially expressed genes between breeds suggests that animal breeding has targeted differentially each tissue's transcriptome.

References

  1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3775-81 [PMID: 12824416]
  2. Cell. 2007 Oct 19;131(2):405-18 [PMID: 17956739]
  3. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Feb 15;31(4):e15 [PMID: 12582260]
  4. Bioinformatics. 2004 Nov 22;20(17):3246-8 [PMID: 15180930]
  5. Genetics. 2006 Nov;174(3):1229-36 [PMID: 16980393]
  6. J Biol Chem. 1984 Sep 10;259(17):10745-53 [PMID: 6088515]
  7. J Anim Sci. 2004 May;82(5):1261-71 [PMID: 15144065]
  8. Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1596-9 [PMID: 17488738]
  9. Genome Biol. 2005;6(3):R22 [PMID: 15774023]
  10. J Comput Biol. 2000;7(6):819-37 [PMID: 11382364]
  11. J Anim Sci. 2006 Jan;84(1):1-10 [PMID: 16361485]
  12. Endocrinology. 2006 Mar;147(3):1148-53 [PMID: 16373412]
  13. Methods Enzymol. 2006;411:119-34 [PMID: 16939789]
  14. Science. 1975 Apr 11;188(4184):107-16 [PMID: 1090005]
  15. Genome Res. 2006 Aug;16(8):995-1004 [PMID: 16825664]
  16. Genet Res. 2001 Apr;77(2):123-8 [PMID: 11355567]
  17. Genome Biol. 2007;8(11):R234 [PMID: 17988385]
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 20;101(16):6062-7 [PMID: 15075390]
  19. Nat Genet. 2002 Oct;32(2):261-6 [PMID: 12219088]
  20. Genetics. 2004 Nov;168(3):1529-37 [PMID: 15579704]
  21. J Biol. 2004;3(5):21 [PMID: 15588312]
  22. Anim Genet. 2006 Aug;37(4):423-4 [PMID: 16879364]
  23. Nat Genet. 2002 Dec;32 Suppl:522-5 [PMID: 12454648]
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 31;98(16):9221-5 [PMID: 11470898]
  25. J Biol Rhythms. 2007 Feb;22(1):43-57 [PMID: 17229924]
  26. Genome Biol. 2007;8(6):R115 [PMID: 17573972]
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Dec 8;95(25):14863-8 [PMID: 9843981]
  28. Nat Genet. 2001 Dec;29(4):389-95 [PMID: 11726925]
  29. Physiol Genomics. 2007 May 11;29(3):267-79 [PMID: 17264241]
  30. Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Sep;8(9):689-98 [PMID: 17680007]
  31. Bioinformatics. 2007 Jun 15;23(12):1562-4 [PMID: 17463032]
  32. Bioinformatics. 2004 Nov 1;20(16):2792-8 [PMID: 15166025]
  33. Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8 [PMID: 11846609]
  34. Nat Genet. 1998 May;19(1):87-90 [PMID: 9590297]
  35. J Anim Sci. 2005 Sep;83(9):2075-86 [PMID: 16100062]
  36. Bioinformatics. 2007 Sep 1;23(17):2239-46 [PMID: 17827208]
  37. Trends Genet. 2005 Nov;21(11):616-23 [PMID: 16154229]

MeSH Term

Animals
Cluster Analysis
Female
Gene Expression Profiling
Male
Models, Genetic
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
Organ Specificity
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Sex Factors
Sus scrofa

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0genestissuesbreedsdifferenttissuetranscriptomeexpresseddifferentiallybreedsexacrossexpressiontwoanimalextremepigoriginsgenedevelopmentsexesaffectedBACKGROUND:Artificialselectionresultedphenotypesorganismmademanyorgansgeneticprogrammepertinentask:relevanttermstotalvariability?distinctlytissues?equallyaffecttissues?RESULTS:ordergaininsightissuesconductedmicroarrayprofiling16fouranimalsLargeWhiteIberianmalesfemalesMixedmodelanalysisneighbor-joiningtreesshowedsimilardevelopmentaloriginclusteredcloserembryonicOftensoundbiologicalinterpretationpossibleoverrepresentedontologycategorieswithingroupsinstanceexcessnervoussystemmusclefoundamongectodermmesodermrespectivelyTissueaccounted~11timesvariabilityNeverthelessableconfidentlyidentifydifferential3319primarilyoverallInteractioncanimportantmuchwhosedifferCONCLUSION:Embryonicleavesenduringfootprintinteractionxsuggestsbreedingtargetedtissue'sTranscriptomearchitecture

Similar Articles

Cited By