Sensorimotor representation and knowledge-based reasoning for spatial exploration and localisation.

C Zetzsche, J Wolter, K Schill
Author Information
  1. C Zetzsche: Kognitive Neuroinformatik, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Abstract

We investigate a hybrid system for autonomous exploration and navigation, and implement it in a virtual mobile agent, which operates in virtual spatial environments. The system is based on several distinguishing properties. The representation is not map-like, but based on sensorimotor features, i.e. on combinations of sensory features and motor actions. The system has a hybrid architecture, which integrates a bottom-up processing of sensorimotor features with a top-down, knowledge-based reasoning strategy. This strategy selects the optimal motor action in each step according to the principle of maximum information gain. Two sensorimotor levels with different behavioural granularity are implemented, a macro-level, which controls the movements of the agent in space, and a micro-level, which controls its eye movements. At each level, the same type of hybrid architecture and the same principle of information gain are used for sensorimotor control. The localisation performance of the system is tested with large sets of virtual rooms containing different mixtures of unique and non-unique objects. The results demonstrate that the system efficiently performs those exploratory motor actions that yield a maximum amount of information about the current environment. Localisation is typically achieved within a few steps. Furthermore, the computational complexity of the underlying computations is limited, and the system is robust with respect to minor variations in the spatial environments.

References

  1. Vision Res. 1971 Sep;11(9):929-42 [PMID: 5133265]
  2. Cognition. 2000 Dec 15;77(3):215-50 [PMID: 11018510]
  3. Psychol Rev. 1954 May;61(3):183-93 [PMID: 13167245]
  4. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Mar;31(2):195-215 [PMID: 15755239]
  5. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):849-78; discussion 878-937 [PMID: 12239891]
  6. Psychol Rev. 1987 Apr;94(2):115-147 [PMID: 3575582]
  7. Am Psychol. 2002 Sep;57(9):705-17 [PMID: 12237980]
  8. Vision Res. 1998 Aug;38(15-16):2387-400 [PMID: 9798006]
  9. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):939-73; discussion 973-1031 [PMID: 12239892]
  10. Network. 2005 Jun-Sep;16(2-3):191-221 [PMID: 16411496]
  11. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Jul;10(4):445-63 [PMID: 9712675]
  12. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Nov;3 Suppl:1212-7 [PMID: 11127840]
  13. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2001;31(4):514-22 [PMID: 18244818]
  14. Science. 1999 Sep 17;285(5435):1914-7 [PMID: 10489371]
  15. Hum Neurobiol. 1985;4(4):219-27 [PMID: 3836989]
  16. Neural Netw. 2004 Jun-Jul;17(5-6):615-23 [PMID: 15288887]
  17. J Neurosci. 1993 Nov;13(11):4700-19 [PMID: 8229193]
  18. Cogn Process. 2006 Jun;7(2):73-88 [PMID: 16683170]

MeSH Term

Algorithms
Cognition
Environment
Eye Movements
Humans
Knowledge Bases
Models, Theoretical
Motion Perception
Orientation
Psychomotor Performance
Space Flight
Space Perception
Spatial Behavior
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0systemsensorimotorhybridvirtualspatialfeaturesmotorinformationexplorationagentenvironmentsbasedrepresentationactionsarchitectureknowledge-basedreasoningstrategyprinciplemaximumgaindifferentcontrolsmovementslocalisationinvestigateautonomousnavigationimplementmobileoperatesseveraldistinguishingpropertiesmap-likeiecombinationssensoryintegratesbottom-upprocessingtop-downselectsoptimalactionstepaccordingTwolevelsbehaviouralgranularityimplementedmacro-levelspacemicro-leveleyeleveltypeusedcontrolperformancetestedlargesetsroomscontainingmixturesuniquenon-uniqueobjectsresultsdemonstrateefficientlyperformsexploratoryyieldamountcurrentenvironmentLocalisationtypicallyachievedwithinstepsFurthermorecomputationalcomplexityunderlyingcomputationslimitedrobustrespectminorvariationsSensorimotor

Similar Articles

Cited By