Visual events modulated by sound in repetition blindness.

Yi-Chuan Chen, Su-Ling Yeh
Author Information
  1. Yi-Chuan Chen: National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Abstract

Repetition blindness (RB; Kanwisher, 1987) is the term used to describe people's failure to detect or report an item that is repeated in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream. Although RB is, by definition, a visual deficit, whether it is affected by an auditory signal remains unknown. In the present study, we added two sounds before, simultaneous with, or after the onset of the two critical visual items during RSVP to examine the effect of sound on RB. The results show that the addition of the sounds effectively reduced RB when they appeared at, or around, the critical items. These results indicate that it is easier to perceive an event containing multisensory information than unisensory ones. Possible mechanisms of how visual and auditory information interact are discussed.

References

  1. Cognition. 2001 Aug;81(1):1-40 [PMID: 11525479]
  2. Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):38-70 [PMID: 17227181]
  3. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):154-63 [PMID: 12763201]
  4. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Jan;55(1):23-40 [PMID: 11873849]
  5. Cognition. 1994 Mar;51(3):199-236 [PMID: 8194301]
  6. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Feb;33(1):137-48 [PMID: 17311484]
  7. Cognition. 2001 Apr;79(1-2):89-113 [PMID: 11164024]
  8. Cognition. 1987 Nov;27(2):117-43 [PMID: 3691023]
  9. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Aug;18(8):1368-79 [PMID: 16859421]
  10. Percept Psychophys. 1986 Apr;39(4):294-300 [PMID: 3737359]
  11. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):497-506 [PMID: 12412889]
  12. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 May;11(5):204-10 [PMID: 17379569]
  13. Cogn Psychol. 1995 Dec;29(3):303-37 [PMID: 8556848]
  14. Vision Res. 2004;44(16):1907-17 [PMID: 15145684]
  15. Nature. 1998 Sep 10;395(6698):169-72 [PMID: 9744274]
  16. Brain Lang. 2004 Jan;88(1):47-53 [PMID: 14698730]
  17. Mem Cognit. 1989 Mar;17(2):117-24 [PMID: 2927309]
  18. Nature. 1976 Dec 23-30;264(5588):746-8 [PMID: 1012311]
  19. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Aug;25(4):1060-75 [PMID: 10464945]
  20. Psychol Sci. 2005 Mar;16(3):228-35 [PMID: 15733204]
  21. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Jun;23(3):738-55 [PMID: 9180042]
  22. Neuroreport. 1997 May 27;8(8):1943-8 [PMID: 9223082]
  23. Nature. 1997 Jan 23;385(6614):308 [PMID: 9002513]
  24. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Jan;160(3):273-82 [PMID: 15551091]
  25. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Feb;26(1):264-78 [PMID: 10696617]
  26. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Jan 1;14(1):62-9 [PMID: 11798387]
  27. Nature. 2000 Oct 19;407(6806):906-8 [PMID: 11057669]
  28. Vision Res. 1989;29(11):1631-47 [PMID: 2635486]
  29. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Jun;20(3):500-19 [PMID: 8027712]
  30. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001 Aug;11(4):505-9 [PMID: 11502399]
  31. Nature. 1997 Jun 19;387(6635):808-10 [PMID: 9194561]

MeSH Term

Attention
Auditory Perception
Humans
Periodicity
Sound
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0RBvisualblindnessRSVPauditorytwosoundscriticalitemssoundresultsinformationRepetitionKanwisher1987termuseddescribepeople'sfailuredetectreportitemrepeatedrapidserialpresentationstreamAlthoughdefinitiondeficitwhetheraffectedsignalremainsunknownpresentstudyaddedsimultaneousonsetexamineeffectshowadditioneffectivelyreducedappearedaroundindicateeasierperceiveeventcontainingmultisensoryunisensoryonesPossiblemechanismsinteractdiscussedVisualeventsmodulatedrepetition

Similar Articles

Cited By