Potentially violent disagreements and parenting stress among American Indian/Alaska Native families: analysis across seven states.

Janice C Probst, Jong-Yi Wang, Amy B Martin, Charity G Moore, Barbara Morningstar Paul, Michael E Samuels
Author Information
  1. Janice C Probst: South Carolina Rural Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 220 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 204, Columbia, SC 29210, USA. jprobst@gwm.sc.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We examined the prevalence and correlates of potentially violent disagreements among AI/AN families with children.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional examination of data from the 2003 National Survey of Children's Health, limited to seven states for which AI/AN race/ethnicity was available in public use files (Alaska, Arizona, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and South Dakota). Disagreements were classified based on how the family deals with conflict. If disagreements involved actual (hitting) or symbolic (throwing) violence, even rarely, the household was categorized as having "potentially violent disagreements," with heated argument and shouting being classified as "heated disagreement." Parenting stress and demographic characteristics were included as potential correlates.
RESULTS: Potentially violent disagreements were reported by 8.4% of AI/AN and 8.4% of white families. The odds for potentially violent disagreements were markedly higher among parents reporting high parenting stress, in both AI/AN (OR 7.20; CI 3.45-15.00) and white (3.59, CI 2.71-4.75) families. High parenting stress had similar effects on the odds for heated discussion. Having a child with special health care needs was associated with parenting stress.
CONCLUSIONS: Questions about disagreement style may be useful as potential screens for domestic violence.

References

J Fam Nurs. 2005 May;11(2):162-82 [PMID: 16287824]
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Mar;156(3):280-5 [PMID: 11876674]
BMC Med. 2004 May 24;2:20 [PMID: 15157273]
JAMA. 2003 Feb 5;289(5):589-600 [PMID: 12578492]
Pediatrics. 2007 Feb;119 Suppl 1:S68-76 [PMID: 17272588]
Women Health. 1998;28(2):55-77 [PMID: 10067806]
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Oct;25(3):238-44 [PMID: 14507531]
Pediatrics. 1998 Jun;101(6):1091-2 [PMID: 9614427]
Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Feb;30(2):109-25 [PMID: 16466789]
Psychol Med. 2005 Mar;35(3):329-40 [PMID: 15841869]
Child Abuse Negl. 2004 Feb;28(2):131-45 [PMID: 15003398]
Science. 1997 Aug 15;277(5328):918-24 [PMID: 9252316]
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Jan;158(1):74-7 [PMID: 14706962]
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):1253-7 [PMID: 15520104]
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E43 [PMID: 11533361]
Child Dev. 1984 Jun;55(3):740-52 [PMID: 6734315]
Child Abuse Negl. 2003 Nov;27(11):1231-46 [PMID: 14637299]
Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):455-63 [PMID: 16452366]

Grants

  1. 1 U1CRH 03711-01/PHS HHS

MeSH Term

Adaptation, Psychological
Adolescent
Adult
Child
Child, Preschool
Confidence Intervals
Conflict, Psychological
Cross-Sectional Studies
Domestic Violence
Family Relations
Female
Humans
Indians, North American
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Inuit
Male
Odds Ratio
Parenting
Prevalence
Stress, Psychological
United States
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By