The deployment of attention in short-term memory tasks: trade-offs between immediate and delayed deployment.

Michael F Bunting, Nelson Cowan, Greg H Colflesh
Author Information
  1. Michael F Bunting: University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA. mbunting@casl.umd.edu

Abstract

Memory at times depends on attention, as when attention is used to encode incoming, serial verbal information. When encoding and rehearsal are difficult or when attention is divided during list presentation, more attention is needed in the time following the presentation and just preceding the response. Across 12 experimental conditions observed in several experiments, we demonstrated this by introducing a nonverbal task with three levels of effort (no task, a natural nonverbal task, or an unnatural version of the task) during a brief retention interval in a short-term digit recall task. Interference from the task during the retention interval was greater when resources were drawn away from the encoding of the stimuli by other factors, including unpredictability of the end point of the list, rapid presentation, and a secondary task during list presentation. When those conditions complicate encoding of the list, we argue, attention is needed after the list so that the contents of passive memory (i.e., postcategorical phonological storage and/or precategorical sensory memory) may be retrieved and become the focus of attention for recall.

References

  1. Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90 [PMID: 24203555]
  2. Mem Cognit. 2003 Jan;31(1):65-76 [PMID: 12699144]
  3. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jul;31(4):714-28 [PMID: 16060775]
  4. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):189-217 [PMID: 15149250]
  5. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):417-423 [PMID: 11058819]
  6. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85 [PMID: 11515286]
  7. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Jun;8(2):331-5 [PMID: 11495122]
  8. Psychol Rev. 1998 Oct;105(4):761-81 [PMID: 9830378]
  9. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Mar;57(3):137-46 [PMID: 13641585]
  10. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Mar;133(1):83-100 [PMID: 14979753]
  11. Mem Cognit. 1999 Sep;27(5):915-27 [PMID: 10540820]
  12. Psychol Bull. 1988 Sep;104(2):163-91 [PMID: 3054993]
  13. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Jun;130(2):169-83 [PMID: 11409097]
  14. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Oct;59(10):1691-700 [PMID: 16945854]
  15. Psychol Bull. 1984 Sep;96(2):341-70 [PMID: 6385047]
  16. Mem Cognit. 1987 Nov;15(6):511-7 [PMID: 3695945]
  17. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Mar;133(1):101-135 [PMID: 14979754]
  18. Brain Cogn. 2004 Nov;56(2):177-88 [PMID: 15518934]
  19. Psychol Rev. 1995 Apr;102(2):211-45 [PMID: 7740089]
  20. Vision Res. 1978;18(10):1279-96 [PMID: 726270]
  21. Cogn Psychol. 2005 Aug;51(1):42-100 [PMID: 16039935]
  22. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Mar;132(1):47-70 [PMID: 12656297]

Grants

  1. R01 HD021338/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R01 HD021338-21/NICHD NIH HHS
  3. T32 HD007460/NICHD NIH HHS
  4. R01 HD-21338/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Attention
Female
Fixation, Ocular
Humans
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Mental Recall

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0attentiontasklistpresentationencodingmemoryneededconditionsnonverbalretentionintervalshort-termrecalldeploymentMemorytimesdependsusedencodeincomingserialverbalinformationrehearsaldifficultdividedtimefollowingjustprecedingresponseAcross12experimentalobservedseveralexperimentsdemonstratedintroducingthreelevelseffortnaturalunnaturalversionbriefdigitInterferencegreaterresourcesdrawnawaystimulifactorsincludingunpredictabilityendpointrapidsecondarycomplicatearguecontentspassiveiepostcategoricalphonologicalstorageand/orprecategoricalsensorymayretrievedbecomefocustasks:trade-offsimmediatedelayed

Similar Articles

Cited By