Understanding the explanatory model of the patient on their medically unexplained symptoms and its implication on treatment development research: a Sri Lanka Study.

Athula Sumathipala, Sisira Siribaddana, Suwin Hewege, Kethaki Sumathipala, Martin Prince, Anthony Mann
Author Information
  1. Athula Sumathipala: Department of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. spjuats@iop.kcl.ac.uk

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) are often distressed, disabled and dissatisfied with the care they receive. Illness beliefs held by patients have a major influence on the decision to consult, persistence of symptoms and the degree of disability. Illness perception models consist of frameworks to organise information from multiple sources into distinct but interrelated dimensions: identity (the illness label), cause, consequences, emotional representations perceived control and timeline. Our aim was to elicit the illness perceptions of patients with MUS in Sri Lankan primary care to modify and improve a CBT intervention.
METHOD: An intervention study was conducted in a hospital primary care clinic in Colombo, Sri Lanka using CBT for MUS. As a part of the baseline assessment, qualitative data was collected using; the Short Explanatory Model Interview (SEMI), from 68 patients (16-65 years) with MUS. We categorised the qualitative data in to key components of the illness perception model, to refine CBT intervention for a subsequent larger trial study.
RESULTS: The cohort was chronically ill and 87% of the patients were ill for more than six months (range six months to 20 years) with 5 or more symptoms and 6 or more visits over preceding six months. A majority were unable to offer an explanation on identity (59%) or the cause (56%), but in the consequence domain 95% expressed significant illness worries; 37% believed their symptoms indicated moderately serious illness and 58% very serious illness. Reflecting emotional representation, 33% reported fear of death, 20% fear of paralysis, 13% fear of developing cancer and the rest unspecified incurable illness. Consequence and emotional domains were significant determinants of distress and consultations. Their repeated visits were to seek help to alleviate symptoms. Only a minority expected investigations (8.8 %) or diagnosis (8.8%). However, the doctors who had previously treated them allegedly concentrated more on identity than cause. The above information was used to develop simple techniques incorporating analogies to alter their perceptions
CONCLUSION: The illness perception model is useful in understanding the continued distress of patients with persistent symptoms without an underlying organic cause. Hence it can make a significant contribution when developing and evaluating culturally sensitive patient friendly interventions.

References

  1. Natl Med J India. 2002 Nov-Dec;15(6):331-5 [PMID: 12540066]
  2. J Psychosom Res. 2007 Feb;62(2):129-38 [PMID: 17270570]
  3. Cult Med Psychiatry. 1977 Apr;1(1):9-23 [PMID: 756356]
  4. Fam Pract. 2001 Oct;18(5):519-23 [PMID: 11604375]
  5. Psychol Med. 1998 Sep;28(5):1231-7 [PMID: 9794030]
  6. J Psychosom Res. 1988;32(2):137-44 [PMID: 3042995]
  7. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 May 9;294(6581):1200-2 [PMID: 3109581]
  8. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Nov;20(11):1032-7 [PMID: 16307629]
  9. BMJ. 1991 Sep 7;303(6802):534-5 [PMID: 1912881]
  10. Med Care. 1990 Jun;28(6):473-88 [PMID: 2355754]
  11. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:253-76 [PMID: 12185210]
  12. Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;193(1):51-9 [PMID: 18700219]
  13. BMJ. 1999 Feb 13;318(7181):436-9 [PMID: 9974461]
  14. Br J Psychiatry. 1992 Jun;160:819-30 [PMID: 1617366]
  15. Psychol Med. 1980 May;10(2):231-41 [PMID: 7384326]
  16. Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):926-30 [PMID: 11346330]
  17. J Psychosom Res. 1991;35(2-3):307-12 [PMID: 1904497]
  18. Am J Psychiatry. 1991 May;148(5):553-63 [PMID: 2018155]
  19. Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Mar;157(3):380-4 [PMID: 10698813]
  20. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2006 May;52(3):221-33 [PMID: 16875194]
  21. Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;184:200-9 [PMID: 14990517]
  22. BMJ. 1997 Dec 6;315(7121):1506-10 [PMID: 9420493]
  23. Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):889-97 [PMID: 11346325]
  24. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2002;32(2):125-40 [PMID: 12269594]
  25. Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Mar;54(500):165-70 [PMID: 15006120]
  26. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Jan;56(1):90-5 [PMID: 9892261]
  27. Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Apr;162:472-80 [PMID: 8481738]
  28. BMJ. 1997 Aug 30;315(7107):520-3 [PMID: 9329308]
  29. Psychol Med. 2000 Jul;30(4):747-57 [PMID: 11037083]
  30. Psychol Med. 1989 Aug;19(3):549-58 [PMID: 2798629]
  31. Psychosom Med. 1996 Sep-Oct;58(5):481-8 [PMID: 8902899]
  32. Psychol Med. 1996 May;26(3):641-6 [PMID: 8733222]
  33. Med Care. 2001 Jul;39(7):705-15 [PMID: 11458135]
  34. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jul;181:6-7 [PMID: 12091256]
  35. JAMA. 2003 Mar 19;289(11):1436-7 [PMID: 12636469]
  36. BMJ. 2000 Feb 19;320(7233):484-8 [PMID: 10678863]
  37. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Feb;38(4):585-92 [PMID: 8184321]
  38. BMJ. 1996 Jul 20;313(7050):158-60 [PMID: 8688780]
  39. Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Mar;53(488):231-9 [PMID: 14694702]
  40. Psychosom Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;65(4):528-33 [PMID: 12883101]
  41. Psychosom Med. 2007 Dec;69(9):876-80 [PMID: 18040098]
  42. Br J Psychiatry. 1998 Sep;173:262-6 [PMID: 9926104]
  43. Arch Fam Med. 1994 Sep;3(9):774-9 [PMID: 7987511]

Grants

  1. /Wellcome Trust

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anxiety Disorders
Diagnosis, Differential
Disability Evaluation
Female
Health Status
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Primary Health Care
Severity of Illness Index
Somatoform Disorders
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0illnesssymptomspatientsMUScausecareperceptionidentityemotionalSriCBTinterventionmodelsixmonthssignificantfear8medicallyunexplainedIllnessinformationprimarystudyLankausingqualitativedatayearsillvisitsseriousdevelopingdistresspatientBACKGROUND:Patientsoftendistresseddisableddissatisfiedreceivebeliefsheldmajorinfluencedecisionconsultpersistencedegreedisabilitymodelsconsistframeworksorganisemultiplesourcesdistinctinterrelateddimensions:labelconsequencesrepresentationsperceivedcontroltimelineaimelicitperceptionsLankanmodifyimproveMETHOD:conductedhospitalclinicColombopartbaselineassessmentcollectedShortExplanatoryModelInterviewSEMI6816-65categorisedkeycomponentsrefinesubsequentlargertrialRESULTS:cohortchronically87%range2056precedingmajorityunableofferexplanation59%56%consequencedomain95%expressedworries37%believedindicatedmoderately58%Reflectingrepresentation33%reporteddeath20%paralysis13%cancerrestunspecifiedincurableConsequencedomainsdeterminantsconsultationsrepeatedseekhelpalleviateminorityexpectedinvestigations%diagnosis8%HoweverdoctorspreviouslytreatedallegedlyconcentrateduseddevelopsimpletechniquesincorporatinganalogiesalterperceptionsCONCLUSION:usefulunderstandingcontinuedpersistentwithoutunderlyingorganicHencecanmakecontributionevaluatingculturallysensitivefriendlyinterventionsUnderstandingexplanatoryimplicationtreatmentdevelopmentresearch:Study

Similar Articles

Cited By