A new GP with special interest headache service: observational study.

Leone Ridsdale, Jane Doherty, Paul McCrone, Paul Seed, Headache Innovation and Evaluation Group
Author Information
  1. Leone Ridsdale: Unit of Neurology and General Practice, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London. L.Ridsdale@iop.kcl.ac.uk

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is poor access to neurology services for patients in the community.
AIM: To describe the training of GPs with special interest (GPwSI) in headache and the setting up of a GPwSI clinic in general practice, and report on a comparison with the existing neurology service in terms of case severity, patient satisfaction, and cost.
DESIGN OF STUDY: New service provision and evaluation by a questionnaire survey.
SETTING: General practice and hospital neurology service in inner-city London.
METHOD: The intervention involved training GPs as GPwSIs and setting up a GP headache service. A questionnaire survey was conducted, measuring headache impact, satisfaction, and cost estimates.
RESULTS: Headache impact was not significantly different between the two groups of patients, referred to hospital and to a GPwSI. Patients were significantly more satisfied with the GPwSI service, particularly that the service was effective in helping to relieve their symptoms (89% versus 76%; adjusted odds ratio=7.7; 95% confidence interval=2.7 to 22.4). The cost per first appointment was estimated to be pound sterling 136, with pound sterling 68 for subsequent contacts. These are lower than costs for neurologist contacts.
CONCLUSION: GPwSI services can satisfy the needs of patients with similar headache impact at costs that are lower than those for secondary care services.

References

  1. Pract Neurol. 2007 Apr;7(2):116-23 [PMID: 17430877]
  2. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Aug;46(4):443-6 [PMID: 1431724]
  3. Qual Life Res. 2003 Dec;12(8):963-74 [PMID: 14651415]
  4. Br J Gen Pract. 2007 May;57(538):388-95 [PMID: 17504590]
  5. BMJ. 2005 Dec 17;331(7530):1444-9 [PMID: 16339217]
  6. Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Jan;57(534):29-35 [PMID: 17244421]
  7. Fam Pract. 1998 Oct;15(5):437-42 [PMID: 9848430]
  8. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;56(7):830 [PMID: 8331364]
  9. Cephalalgia. 2007 Mar;27(3):193-210 [PMID: 17381554]
  10. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Feb;68(2):202-6 [PMID: 10644788]
  11. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(8):501-10 [PMID: 6879249]
  12. Headache. 2003 Jan;43(1):14-8 [PMID: 12864753]
  13. Neuroepidemiology. 1993;12(3):179-94 [PMID: 8272178]
  14. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;77(3):385-7 [PMID: 16484650]

MeSH Term

Adult
Delivery of Health Care
England
Family Practice
Female
Headache Disorders
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Male
Neurology
Patient Satisfaction
Program Evaluation
Referral and Consultation
Severity of Illness Index
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0serviceGPwSIheadacheneurologyservicespatientscostimpacttrainingGPsspecialinterestsettingpracticesatisfactionquestionnairesurveyhospitalGPsignificantly7poundsterlingcontactslowercostsBACKGROUND:pooraccesscommunityAIM:describeclinicgeneralreportcomparisonexistingtermscaseseveritypatientDESIGNOFSTUDY:NewprovisionevaluationSETTING:Generalinner-cityLondonMETHOD:interventioninvolvedGPwSIsconductedmeasuringestimatesRESULTS:HeadachedifferenttwogroupsreferredPatientssatisfiedparticularlyeffectivehelpingrelievesymptoms89%versus76%adjustedoddsratio=795%confidenceinterval=2224perfirstappointmentestimated13668subsequentneurologistCONCLUSION:cansatisfyneedssimilarsecondarycarenewservice:observationalstudy

Similar Articles

Cited By