Empirical validation of a procedure to correct position and stimulus biases in matching-to-sample.

Brian D Kangas, Marc N Branch
Author Information
  1. Brian D Kangas: Department of Psychology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 112250, Gainesville, FL 32611-2250, USA. kangas@ufl.edu

Abstract

The development of position and stimulus biases often occurs during initial training on matching-to-sample tasks. Furthermore, without intervention, these biases can be maintained via intermittent reinforcement provided by matching-to-sample contingencies. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of a correction procedure designed to eliminate both position and stimulus biases. Following key-peck training, a group of 6 pigeons had extended exposure to matching-to-sample contingencies without a correction procedure, a group of 4 pigeons was briefly exposed to a simultaneous matching-to-sample procedure to assess biases prior to exposure to the correction procedure, and a group of 5 pigeons was exposed directly to the correction procedure. The correction procedure arranged that every time an incorrect match was made, the trial configuration was repeated on the subsequent trial until a correct match was made. Extended exposure to matching-to-sample contingencies without a correction procedure was associated with reduced biases eventually for most subjects, but rapid development of near-perfect accuracy and bias-free performance was observed upon the implementation of the correction procedure regardless of the type of bias. Bias-free performance was maintained following subsequent exposure to a zero-delay MTS procedure.

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):399-408 [PMID: 16812749]
  2. Q J Exp Psychol B. 2001 Feb;54(1):69-79 [PMID: 11216302]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):15-34 [PMID: 16812424]
  4. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Jul;27(3):239-51 [PMID: 11497323]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:281-4 [PMID: 13718829]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 May;69(3):311-26 [PMID: 16812879]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6(1):101-7 [PMID: 16811275]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):303-15 [PMID: 7310261]
  9. Science. 1975 Feb 21;187(4177):662-4 [PMID: 1114318]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 May;79(3):307-21 [PMID: 12908760]
  11. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Oct;31(4):449-66 [PMID: 16248731]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Apr;2:151-60 [PMID: 13801643]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Jan;31(1):15-22 [PMID: 429958]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Jan;63(1):33-51 [PMID: 16812751]
  15. Behav Pharmacol. 2005 Jul;16(4):193-208 [PMID: 15961959]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Sep;32(2):183-9 [PMID: 501271]

Grants

  1. K05 DA014249/NIDA NIH HHS
  2. R01 DA004074/NIDA NIH HHS
  3. DA004074/NIDA NIH HHS
  4. DA014249/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Behavior, Animal
Columbidae
Conditioning, Operant
Empirical Research
Male

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0procedurecorrectionbiasesmatching-to-sampleexposurepositionstimuluswithoutcontingenciesgrouppigeonsdevelopmenttrainingmaintainedexposedmatchmadetrialsubsequentcorrectperformanceoftenoccursinitialtasksFurthermoreinterventioncanviaintermittentreinforcementprovidedpresentstudyevaluatedeffectivenessdesignedeliminateFollowingkey-peck6extended4brieflysimultaneousassessprior5directlyarrangedeverytimeincorrectconfigurationrepeatedExtendedassociatedreducedeventuallysubjectsrapidnear-perfectaccuracybias-freeobserveduponimplementationregardlesstypebiasBias-freefollowingzero-delayMTSEmpiricalvalidation

Similar Articles

Cited By