Testing random effects in the linear mixed model using approximate bayes factors.

Benjamin R Saville, Amy H Herring
Author Information
  1. Benjamin R Saville: Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, S-2323 Medical Center North, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2158, USA. benjamin.r.saville@vanderbilt.edu

Abstract

SUMMARY: Deciding which predictor effects may vary across subjects is a difficult issue. Standard model selection criteria and test procedures are often inappropriate for comparing models with different numbers of random effects due to constraints on the parameter space of the variance components. Testing on the boundary of the parameter space changes the asymptotic distribution of some classical test statistics and causes problems in approximating Bayes factors. We propose a simple approach for testing random effects in the linear mixed model using Bayes factors. We scale each random effect to the residual variance and introduce a parameter that controls the relative contribution of each random effect free of the scale of the data. We integrate out the random effects and the variance components using closed-form solutions. The resulting integrals needed to calculate the Bayes factor are low-dimensional integrals lacking variance components and can be efficiently approximated with Laplace's method. We propose a default prior distribution on the parameter controlling the contribution of each random effect and conduct simulations to show that our method has good properties for model selection problems. Finally, we illustrate our methods on data from a clinical trial of patients with bipolar disorder and on data from an environmental study of water disinfection by-products and male reproductive outcomes.

References

  1. Biometrics. 1982 Dec;38(4):963-74 [PMID: 7168798]
  2. Biometrics. 2003 Jun;59(2):254-62 [PMID: 12926710]
  3. Biometrics. 2003 Dec;59(4):762-9 [PMID: 14969453]
  4. Biometrics. 2006 Jun;62(2):446-57 [PMID: 16918908]
  5. Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1171-7 [PMID: 7786999]
  6. Stat Med. 2008 Jul 10;27(15):2865-73 [PMID: 17960576]
  7. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;64(9):1013-24 [PMID: 14628976]
  8. Biometrics. 2007 Sep;63(3):690-8 [PMID: 17403104]
  9. J Math Psychol. 2000 Mar;44(1):92-107 [PMID: 10733859]

Grants

  1. P30 ES010126/NIEHS NIH HHS
  2. T32ES007018/NIEHS NIH HHS
  3. T32 ES007018/NIEHS NIH HHS
  4. P30ES10126/NIEHS NIH HHS
  5. P30 ES010126-10/NIEHS NIH HHS
  6. T32 ES007018-30/NIEHS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Algorithms
Bayes Theorem
Biometry
Cluster Analysis
Computer Simulation
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Epidemiologic Research Design
Linear Models
Pattern Recognition, Automated
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
Sensitivity and Specificity

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0randomeffectsmodelparametervariancecomponentsBayesfactorsusingeffectdataselectiontestspaceTestingdistributionproblemsproposelinearmixedscalecontributionintegralsmethodSUMMARY:DecidingpredictormayvaryacrosssubjectsdifficultissueStandardcriteriaproceduresofteninappropriatecomparingmodelsdifferentnumbersdueconstraintsboundarychangesasymptoticclassicalstatisticscausesapproximatingsimpleapproachtestingresidualintroducecontrolsrelativefreeintegrateclosed-formsolutionsresultingneededcalculatefactorlow-dimensionallackingcanefficientlyapproximatedLaplace'sdefaultpriorcontrollingconductsimulationsshowgoodpropertiesFinallyillustratemethodsclinicaltrialpatientsbipolardisorderenvironmentalstudywaterdisinfectionby-productsmalereproductiveoutcomesapproximatebayes

Similar Articles

Cited By