Persistent spatial working memory deficits in rats with bilateral cortical microgyria.

R Holly Fitch, Heather Breslawski, Glenn D Rosen, James J Chrobak
Author Information
  1. R Holly Fitch: Department of Psychology/Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA. roslyn.h.fitch@uconn.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anomalies of cortical neuronal migration (e.g., microgyria (MG) and/or ectopias) are associated with a variety of language and cognitive deficits in human populations. In rodents, postnatal focal freezing lesions lead to the formation of cortical microgyria similar to those seen in human dyslexic brains, and also cause subsequent deficits in rapid auditory processing similar to those reported in human language impaired populations. Thus convergent findings support the ongoing study of disruptions in neuronal migration in rats as a putative model to provide insight on human language disability. Since deficits in working memory using both verbal and non-verbal tasks also characterize dyslexic populations, the present study examined the effects of neonatally induced bilateral cortical microgyria (MG) on working memory in adult male rats.
METHODS: A delayed match-to-sample radial water maze task, in which the goal arm was altered among eight locations on a daily basis, was used to assess working memory performance in MG (n = 8) and sham (n = 10) littermates.
RESULTS: Over a period of 60 sessions of testing (each session comprising one pre-delay sample trial, and one post-delay test trial), all rats showed learning as evidenced by a significant decrease in overall test errors. However, MG rats made significantly more errors than shams during initial testing, and this memory deficit was still evident after 60 days (12 weeks) of testing. Analyses performed on daily error patterns showed that over the course of testing, MG rats utilized a strategy similar to shams (but with less effectiveness, as indicated by more errors).
CONCLUSION: These results indicate persistent abnormalities in the spatial working memory system in rats with induced disruptions of neocortical neuronal migration.

References

  1. Science. 1996 Aug 16;273(5277):971-3 [PMID: 8688085]
  2. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Jun 14;682:27-47 [PMID: 7686725]
  3. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2001 Jul;76(1):33-45 [PMID: 11525251]
  4. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2004 Sep 17;152(2):93-8 [PMID: 15351496]
  5. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Jul 15;52(2):101-10 [PMID: 12114001]
  6. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2004 Jan 31;148(1):53-7 [PMID: 14757518]
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 16;91(17):8010-3 [PMID: 8058748]
  8. Ann Neurol. 1985 Aug;18(2):222-33 [PMID: 4037763]
  9. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep;12(5):828-39 [PMID: 11054924]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 3;95(5):2636-41 [PMID: 9482939]
  11. Neuroscience. 2006 Aug 25;141(2):875-88 [PMID: 16725276]
  12. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2003 Sep;2(3):155-78 [PMID: 15006291]
  13. Nature. 1982 Jun 24;297(5868):681-3 [PMID: 7088155]
  14. BMC Neurosci. 2003 Jun 24;4:12 [PMID: 12823865]
  15. Neuroreport. 2004 Aug 26;15(12):1923-6 [PMID: 15305138]
  16. Physiol Behav. 2000 Jul 1-15;70(1-2):1-5 [PMID: 10978470]
  17. Cereb Cortex. 1996 Sep-Oct;6(5):696-700 [PMID: 8921204]
  18. J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Oct;36(5):948-58 [PMID: 8246483]
  19. BMC Neurosci. 2007;8:94 [PMID: 17997836]
  20. Dyslexia. 2001 Jul-Sep;7(3):150-70 [PMID: 11765982]
  21. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(3):396-411 [PMID: 16054661]
  22. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2002 Oct 20;138(2):187-93 [PMID: 12354646]
  23. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1991 Mar;50(2):145-60 [PMID: 2010774]
  24. Neuroreport. 2000 Mar 20;11(4):693-6 [PMID: 10757502]
  25. Brain Res. 2000 Jul 14;871(1):94-7 [PMID: 10882787]
  26. Genes Brain Behav. 2007 Oct;6(7):640-6 [PMID: 17309662]
  27. Behav Neurosci. 1997 Apr;111(2):404-12 [PMID: 9106679]
  28. Brain Res. 1995 May 29;681(1-2):177-89 [PMID: 7552277]
  29. Cereb Cortex. 1997 Jul-Aug;7(5):453-64 [PMID: 9261574]
  30. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1992 Nov;51(6):601-11 [PMID: 1484290]
  31. Neurology. 2005 Mar 8;64(5):799-803 [PMID: 15753412]
  32. J Comp Neurol. 2000 Mar 20;418(4):423-40 [PMID: 10713571]
  33. J Exp Child Psychol. 1983 Apr;35(2):345-67 [PMID: 6842131]
  34. Brain Res Bull. 2007 Mar 15;71(5):508-14 [PMID: 17259020]
  35. J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Mar;93(3):265-81 [PMID: 16293261]
  36. Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Dec;2(4):460-93 [PMID: 24203785]
  37. J Neurophysiol. 2005 Feb;93(2):687-96 [PMID: 15385597]
  38. Can J Neurol Sci. 1987 Feb;14(1):1-16 [PMID: 3545413]
  39. Behav Brain Res. 1997 Mar;84(1-2):23-9 [PMID: 9079769]
  40. J Exp Child Psychol. 1997 Feb;64(2):199-231 [PMID: 9120381]
  41. Dev Psychobiol. 2001 Dec;39(4):286-300 [PMID: 11745324]
  42. Neurology. 2007 Dec 4;69(23):2146-54 [PMID: 18056578]
  43. Neuroreport. 2001 Feb 12,;12(2):299-307 [PMID: 11209939]
  44. Dev Sci. 2007 Mar;10(2):213-36 [PMID: 17286846]
  45. Memory. 2007 Jan;15(1):34-56 [PMID: 17479923]
  46. J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 23;28(17):4512-20 [PMID: 18434529]
  47. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1998 Dec 7;111(2):291-3 [PMID: 9838168]
  48. Brain Res Bull. 2008 May 15;76(1-2):1-7 [PMID: 18395604]
  49. Nature. 1997 May 8;387(6629):176-8 [PMID: 9144287]
  50. Cognition. 2006 Sep;101(2):385-413 [PMID: 16844106]
  51. Hippocampus. 1999;9(2):118-36 [PMID: 10226773]
  52. Brain Res. 2000 Apr 28;863(1-2):151-9 [PMID: 10773203]
  53. Cereb Cortex. 1994 May-Jun;4(3):260-70 [PMID: 8075531]
  54. Neuroreport. 2002 Dec 3;13(17):2277-80 [PMID: 12488810]
  55. Neuroreport. 2001 Sep 17;12(13):2875-9 [PMID: 11588594]

Grants

  1. P01 HD020806/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. P01 HD020806-16A10012/NICHD NIH HHS
  3. P01 HD057853/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ratsmemoryMGworkingcorticalmicrogyriadeficitshumantestingneuronalmigrationlanguagepopulationssimilarerrorsdyslexicalsostudydisruptionsinducedbilateraldailyn=60onetrialtestshowedshamsspatialBACKGROUND:Anomaliesegand/orectopiasassociatedvarietycognitiverodentspostnatalfocalfreezinglesionsleadformationseenbrainscausesubsequentrapidauditoryprocessingreportedimpairedThusconvergentfindingssupportongoingputativemodelprovideinsightdisabilitySinceusingverbalnon-verbaltaskscharacterizepresentexaminedeffectsneonatallyadultmaleMETHODS:delayedmatch-to-sampleradialwatermazetaskgoalarmalteredamongeightlocationsbasisusedassessperformance8sham10littermatesRESULTS:periodsessionssessioncomprisingpre-delaysamplepost-delaylearningevidencedsignificantdecreaseoverallHowevermadesignificantlyinitialdeficitstillevidentdays12weeksAnalysesperformederrorpatternscourseutilizedstrategylesseffectivenessindicatedCONCLUSION:resultsindicatepersistentabnormalitiessystemneocorticalPersistent

Similar Articles

Cited By