Peer support telephone calls for improving health.

Jeremy Dale, Isabela O Caramlau, Antje Lindenmeyer, Susan M Williams
Author Information
  1. Jeremy Dale: Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill campus, Coventry, Warwickshire, UK, CV4 7AL. jeremy.dale@warwick.ac.uk

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peer support telephone calls have been used for a wide range of health-related concerns. However, little is known about their effects.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of peer support telephone calls in terms of physical (e.g. blood pressure), psychological (e.g. depressive symptoms), and behavioural health outcomes (e.g. uptake of mammography) and other outcomes.
SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched: The Cochrane Library databases (CENTRAL, DARE, CDSR) (issue 4 2007); MEDLINE (OVID) (January 1966 to December 2007); EMBASE (OVID) (January 1985 to December 2007); CINAHL (Athens) (January 1966 to December 2007), trials registers and reference lists of articles, with no language restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of peer support interventions delivered by telephone call.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data. We present results narratively and in tabular format. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity between studies.
MAIN RESULTS: We included seven studies involving 2492 participants.Peer support telephone calls were associated with an increase in mammography screening, with 49% of women in the intervention group and 34% of women in the control group receiving a mammogram since the start of the intervention (P 12). The peer support intervention significantly decreased depressive symptomatology at the 4-week assessment (odds ratio (OR) 6.23 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15 to 33.77; P = 0.02)) and 8-week assessment (OR 6.23 (95% CI 1.40 to 27.84; P = 0.01). One study investigated the use of peer support for patients with poorly controlled diabetes. There were no significant differences between groups for self-efficacy, HbA1C, cholesterol level and body mass index.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Whilst this review provides some evidence that peer support telephone calls can be effective for certain health-related concerns, few of the studies were of high quality and so results should be interpreted cautiously. There were many methodological limitations thus limiting the generalisability of findings. Overall, there is a need for further well designed randomised controlled studies to clarify the cost and clinical effectiveness of peer support telephone calls for improvement in health and health-related behaviour.

References

  1. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Aug;45(4):378-83 [PMID: 11501726]
  2. Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Dec;54(12):1604-9 [PMID: 14645799]
  3. Fam Pract. 2005 Jun;22(3):253-65 [PMID: 15824055]
  4. Am J Prev Med. 2000 Feb;18(2):123-31 [PMID: 10698242]
  5. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2000 Nov-Dec;11(6):37-44 [PMID: 11082801]
  6. Community Ment Health J. 1996 Feb;32(1):47-67 [PMID: 8635317]
  7. Diabetes Care. 2002 Sep;25(9):1576-83 [PMID: 12196430]
  8. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Mar;40(3):321-32 [PMID: 12605954]
  9. CMAJ. 2002 Jan 8;166(1):21-8 [PMID: 11800243]
  10. Prev Med. 2006 Jun;42(6):435-42 [PMID: 16626797]
  11. Mult Scler. 2005 Apr;11(2):222-6 [PMID: 15795964]
  12. Birth. 2002 Sep;29(3):169-76 [PMID: 12153647]
  13. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1999 May;54(3):S173-80 [PMID: 10363048]
  14. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002 Jul-Aug;31(4):418-27 [PMID: 12146931]
  15. Telemed J E Health. 2006 Aug;12(4):490-5 [PMID: 16942422]
  16. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3):Suppl:94-127 [PMID: 5967464]
  17. Qual Health Res. 2000 Mar;10(2):260-76 [PMID: 10788287]
  18. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Sep;159(9):836-41 [PMID: 16143742]
  19. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2005 Jun;37(2):85-91 [PMID: 15961362]
  20. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD001141 [PMID: 17253455]
  21. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):2093-9 [PMID: 17513815]
  22. AIDS Behav. 2007 Jan;11(1):5-14 [PMID: 16705479]
  23. Arch Fam Med. 2000 Aug;9(8):700-8 [PMID: 10927707]
  24. J Pediatr Psychol. 1996 Oct;21(5):633-41 [PMID: 8936893]
  25. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Sep;158(9):897-902 [PMID: 15351756]
  26. Health Educ Res. 2005 Apr;20(2):128-36 [PMID: 15314037]
  27. Prev Med. 2000 Jul;31(1):68-74 [PMID: 10896845]
  28. Aust N Z J Med. 1995 Aug;25(4):362-4 [PMID: 8540879]
  29. Am J Prev Med. 1994 Nov-Dec;10(6):361-6 [PMID: 7880557]
  30. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Apr;75(1):91-8 [PMID: 19013741]
  31. CMAJ. 2003 Apr 15;168(8):969-73 [PMID: 12695379]
  32. Health Psychol. 2007 Jul;26(4):488-95 [PMID: 17605569]
  33. Can J Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;48(2):115-24 [PMID: 12655910]
  34. Patient Educ Couns. 1999 May;37(1):3-18 [PMID: 10640115]
  35. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Oct;59(1):1-12 [PMID: 16198213]
  36. Health Promot Pract. 2005 Jan;6(1):105-8 [PMID: 15574535]
  37. Gerontologist. 1990 Jun;30(3):399-404 [PMID: 2354800]
  38. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Apr;59(2):325-32 [PMID: 2030195]
  39. Int J Nurs Stud. 1995 Dec;32(6):535-44 [PMID: 8926155]
  40. Int Breastfeed J. 2007 Sep 20;2:12 [PMID: 17883851]
  41. J Hum Lact. 1998 Mar;14(1):15-22 [PMID: 9543954]
  42. Tob Control. 2000;9 Suppl 3:III72-4 [PMID: 10982914]
  43. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007 Jul-Aug;22(4):313-9 [PMID: 17589284]
  44. Cancer Nurs. 2003 Dec;26(6):439-47 [PMID: 15022975]
  45. Health Commun. 2001;13(3):285-305 [PMID: 11550852]
  46. BMJ. 2003 Apr 12;326(7393):796-9 [PMID: 12689977]
  47. Diabetes Educ. 2005 Nov-Dec;31(6):869-79 [PMID: 16288094]
  48. Diabetes Educ. 2004 May-Jun;30(3):476-84 [PMID: 15208845]
  49. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD002098 [PMID: 10796678]
  50. J Health Commun. 2006;11(1):61-74 [PMID: 16546919]
  51. J Med Internet Res. 2007 May 14;9(2):e12 [PMID: 17513283]
  52. Cancer Nurs. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):488-98 [PMID: 17135823]
  53. Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 1):1037-57 [PMID: 11130802]
  54. Ann Behav Med. 2002 Spring;24(2):141-8 [PMID: 12054319]
  55. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD002850 [PMID: 16855992]
  56. Am J Prev Med. 2000 Apr;18(3):199-207 [PMID: 10722985]
  57. Soc Work. 1990 Nov;35(6):556-62 [PMID: 2284602]
  58. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Jun;48(11):1563-75 [PMID: 10400257]
  59. Arthritis Rheum. 1989 Dec;32(12):1577-83 [PMID: 2688659]
  60. Am J Public Health. 2000 Sep;90(9):1468-71 [PMID: 10983211]
  61. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Apr;59(4):288-95 [PMID: 15767382]
  62. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001 Apr;38(2):209-25 [PMID: 11223062]
  63. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 20;23(27):6516-23 [PMID: 16116148]
  64. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Jul;3(3):A93 [PMID: 16776894]
  65. Health Psychol. 1999 May;18(3):211-20 [PMID: 10357502]
  66. Pediatrics. 1994 Sep;94(3):322-32 [PMID: 8065857]
  67. Aust Fam Physician. 2005 Apr;34(4):288-9 [PMID: 15861755]
  68. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD004015 [PMID: 15674924]
  69. Birth. 2002 Jun;29(2):95-100 [PMID: 12000411]
  70. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 29;329(5):321-5 [PMID: 8321260]
  71. Am J Health Promot. 2008 Jan-Feb;22(3):176-9 [PMID: 18251117]
  72. Tob Control. 1997 Autumn;6(3):188-93 [PMID: 9396102]
  73. Arthritis Care Res. 1998 Dec;11(6):448-54 [PMID: 10030176]
  74. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2007 Jun;37(3):308-21 [PMID: 17579543]
  75. N Z Med J. 1995 Nov 24;108(1012):476-8 [PMID: 8538974]
  76. Ann Behav Med. 2006 Aug;32(1):27-38 [PMID: 16827627]
  77. Am J Community Psychol. 1991 Feb;19(1):53-74 [PMID: 1867151]
  78. Am J Public Health. 1992 Jan;82(1):41-6 [PMID: 1536333]
  79. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006 Mar;5(1):83-9 [PMID: 16256442]
  80. Can J Public Health. 1995 Mar-Apr;86(2):124-7 [PMID: 7757891]
  81. Arthritis Rheum. 1992 May;35(5):511-5 [PMID: 1575787]
  82. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2007 May;14(3):291-301 [PMID: 17430453]
  83. Evid Based Nurs. 2002 Jul;5(3):75 [PMID: 12123259]
  84. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Jul;155(7):771-7 [PMID: 11434842]
  85. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60 [PMID: 12958120]

MeSH Term

Chronic Disease
Counseling
Female
Health Behavior
Health Status
Humans
Peer Group
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Telephone

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0supporttelephonecallspeerPeerP=0health2007studiesassociatedinterventionhealth-relatedegdepressiveoutcomesmammographyJanuaryDecembercontrolledwomenstudypostpatientsgroupsconcernseffectssymptomsuptakeOVID1966trialsreviewresultsscreeninggroupanothermyocardialinfarctionmonthssignificantdifferencesself-efficacymothers01assessmentOR62395%CI1BACKGROUND:usedwiderangeHoweverlittleknownOBJECTIVES:assesstermsphysicalbloodpressurepsychologicalbehaviouralSEARCHSTRATEGY:searched:CochraneLibrarydatabasesCENTRALDARECDSRissue4MEDLINEEMBASE1985CINAHLAthensregistersreferencelistsarticleslanguagerestrictionsSELECTIONCRITERIA:RandomisedinterventionsdeliveredcallDATACOLLECTIONANDANALYSIS:TwoauthorsindependentlyextracteddatapresentnarrativelytabularformatMeta-analysispossibledueheterogeneityMAINRESULTS:includedseveninvolving2492participantsincrease49%34%controlreceivingmammogramsincestart</001foundmaintainbaselineadherent029sixchangedietusualcare54%44%respectively03statusmentalgreatercontinuationbreastfeeding3partumreducedpostnataldepressionEdinburghPostnatalDepressionScaleEPDS>12significantlydecreasedsymptomatology4-weekoddsratioconfidenceinterval153377028-week402784OneinvestigatedusepoorlydiabetesHbA1CcholesterollevelbodymassindexAUTHORS'CONCLUSIONS:WhilstprovidesevidencecaneffectivecertainhighqualityinterpretedcautiouslymanymethodologicallimitationsthuslimitinggeneralisabilityfindingsOverallneedwelldesignedrandomisedclarifycostclinicaleffectivenessimprovementbehaviourimproving

Similar Articles

Cited By