Stereological evaluation of volumetric asymmetry in healthy human cerebellum.

Nuket Gocmen-Mas, Can Pelin, Sinan Canan, Ayse Canan Yazici, Ragiba Zagyapan, Sevda Senan, Hamit Selim Karabekir, Bunyamin Sahin
Author Information
  1. Nuket Gocmen-Mas: Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. nuketgocmen@yahoo.com

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Age-related volumetric differences in brain anatomy or volumetric brain analyses in many disorders are of interest. Delineating the normal anatomical cerebellar volume is of importance for both the anatomists and clinicians. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the cerebellar volume using a stereological technique and to determine the possible volumetric asymmetry depending on age and gender.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volumetric asymmetry of cerebellar hemispheres was evaluated using stereological method on the magnetic resonance images (MRI) of healthy male and female subjects. Randomly selected individuals (27 males, 27 females) aged between 10-86 years who have normal brain MRI were enclosed in the study. All the subjects were right handed. The individuals were divided into three groups according to age as 18-34 (young), 35-60 (middle aged) and 60-84 (elder) and their MRI images were analyzed. The data set were analyzed by two factor repeated measure analysis.
RESULTS: Although the cerebellum was smaller between young and middle aged groups and also middle aged and elder groups, there were no any statistically significant differences between compared groups' mean (P > 0.05). There were not statistically differences according to sex and age groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no cerebellar asymmetry between compared groups. The stereological evaluation of cerebellar asymmetry in humans correlate with both gender and age groups is of importance for both clinicians and anatomists. The technique is simple, reliable, unbiased and inexpensive.

References

  1. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1997 May-Jun;21(3):201-4 [PMID: 9258598]
  2. Am J Psychiatry. 1980 Mar;137(3):359-61 [PMID: 7356066]
  3. Addict Biol. 2007 Mar;12(1):122-32 [PMID: 17407506]
  4. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007 Oct;32(10):2229-37 [PMID: 17299505]
  5. J Comp Neurol. 2003 Nov 17;466(3):356-65 [PMID: 14556293]
  6. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Apr;28(4):678-82 [PMID: 17416820]
  7. J Child Neurol. 2008 Apr;23(4):368-80 [PMID: 18160557]
  8. Eur J Radiol. 2006 Jan;57(1):96-101 [PMID: 16112829]
  9. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008 Jun;30(4):335-9 [PMID: 18292960]
  10. Prenat Diagn. 1998 Feb;18(2):173-7 [PMID: 9516019]
  11. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1979 Jan;38(1):57-71 [PMID: 219154]
  12. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jul;7(7):511-22 [PMID: 16791141]
  13. Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Aug 15;19(2):E8 [PMID: 16122217]
  14. J Neuroimaging. 2001 Oct;11(4):393-400 [PMID: 11677879]
  15. J Clin Neurosci. 2006 Jan;13(1):60-72 [PMID: 16410199]
  16. Brain. 2004 Aug;127(Pt 8):1785-95 [PMID: 15240431]
  17. Behav Neurosci. 1994 Oct;108(5):848-65 [PMID: 7826509]
  18. J Neurosurg. 2005 Nov;103(5):783-8 [PMID: 16304980]
  19. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;46(4):515-23 [PMID: 17420687]
  20. Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;182:354-61 [PMID: 12668413]
  21. Pediatr Radiol. 1995 Nov;25 Suppl 1:S20-5 [PMID: 8577528]
  22. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996 Jan-Feb;20(1):98-106 [PMID: 8576490]
  23. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Jun-Jul;22(6):1161-7 [PMID: 11415913]
  24. Neuroimage. 2007 Jun;36(2):298-312 [PMID: 17449282]
  25. Lancet. 1979 Mar 31;1(8118):718-9 [PMID: 85950]
  26. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1979 Oct;167(10 ):585-92 [PMID: 573778]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
Analysis of Variance
Cerebellum
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Organ Size

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0groupscerebellarasymmetryvolumetricageageddifferencesbrainstereologicalMRImiddlenormalvolumeimportanceanatomistscliniciansstudyusingtechniquegenderimageshealthysubjectsindividuals27accordingyoungelderanalyzedcerebellumstatisticallycomparedP>005evaluationOBJECTIVES:Age-relatedanatomyanalysesmanydisordersinterestDelineatinganatomicalpresentaimedevaluatedeterminepossibledependingMATERIALSANDMETHODS:VolumetrichemispheresevaluatedmethodmagneticresonancemalefemaleRandomlyselectedmalesfemales10-86yearsenclosedrighthandeddividedthree18-3435-6060-84datasettwofactorrepeatedmeasureanalysisRESULTS:Althoughsmalleralsosignificantgroups'meansexCONCLUSIONS:humanscorrelatesimplereliableunbiasedinexpensiveStereologicalhuman

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)