Combined delivery approach of bone marrow mononuclear stem cells early and late after myocardial infarction: the MYSTAR prospective, randomized study.

Mariann Gyöngyösi, Irene Lang, Markus Dettke, Gilbert Beran, Senta Graf, Heinz Sochor, Noémi Nyolczas, Silvia Charwat, Rayyan Hemetsberger, Günter Christ, István Edes, László Balogh, Korff Thomas Krause, Kai Jaquet, Karl-Heinz Kuck, Imre Benedek, Theodora Hintea, Róbert Kiss, István Préda, Vladimir Kotevski, Hristo Pejkov, Sholeh Zamini, Aliasghar Khorsand, Gottfried Sodeck, Alexandra Kaider, Gerald Maurer, Dietmar Glogar
Author Information
  1. Mariann Gyöngyösi: Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. mariann.gyongyosi@meduniwien.ac.at

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combined intracoronary and intramyocardial administration might improve outcomes for bone-marrow-derived stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We compared the safety and feasibility of early and late delivery of stem cells with combined therapy approaches.
METHODS: patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 45% after AMI were randomly assigned stem cell delivery via intramyocardial injection and intracoronary infusion 3-6 weeks or 3-4 months after AMI. Primary end points were changes in infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction 3 months after therapy.
RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were treated. The mean changes in infarct size at 3 months were -3.5 +/- 5.1% (95% CI -5.5% to -1.5%, P = 0.001) in the early group and -3.9 +/- 5.6% (95% CI -6.1% to -1.6%, P = 0.002) in the late group, and changes in ejection fraction were 3.5 +/- 5.6% (95% CI 1.3-5.6%, P = 0.003) and 3.4 +/- 7.0% (95% CI 0.7-6.1%, P = 0.017), respectively. At 9-12 months after AMI, ejection fraction remained significantly higher than at baseline in both groups. In the early and late groups, a mean of 200.3 +/- 68.7 x 10(6) and 194.8 +/- 60.4 x 10(6) stem cells, respectively, were delivered to the myocardium, and 1.30 +/- 0.68 x 10(9) and 1.29 +/- 0.41 x 10(9) cells, respectively, were delivered into the artery. A high number of cells was required for significant improvements in the primary end points.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined cardiac stem cell delivery induces a moderate but significant improvement in myocardial infarct size and left ventricular function.

References

  1. Circulation. 2000 Jan 4-11;101(1):101-8 [PMID: 10618311]
  2. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 13;348(7):593-600 [PMID: 12584367]
  3. Circulation. 2003 May 13;107(18):2294-302 [PMID: 12707230]
  4. Cardiovasc Res. 2002 Jan;53(1):31-47 [PMID: 11744011]
  5. Circulation. 2006 May 23;113(20):2398-405 [PMID: 16702474]
  6. Circulation. 2001 Aug 28;104(9):1005-11 [PMID: 11524393]
  7. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2006 Mar;3 Suppl 1:S69-72 [PMID: 16501635]
  8. Nat Med. 2003 Nov;9(11):1370-6 [PMID: 14556003]
  9. Circulation. 2006 Apr 25;113(16):1983-92 [PMID: 16531621]
  10. Am J Cardiol. 2006 May 1;97(9):1326-31 [PMID: 16635605]
  11. Am Heart J. 2007 Feb;153(2):212.e1-7 [PMID: 17239678]
  12. Circulation. 2002 Dec 10;106(24):3009-17 [PMID: 12473544]
  13. Circulation. 2001 Sep 18;104(12 Suppl 1):I314-8 [PMID: 11568075]
  14. Circulation. 1997 Mar 18;95(6):1611-22 [PMID: 9118532]
  15. Z Kardiol. 2001 Dec;90(12):964-9 [PMID: 11826838]
  16. Am J Cardiol. 2005 Mar 15;95(6):722-8 [PMID: 15757597]
  17. Tex Heart Inst J. 2004;31(3):214-9 [PMID: 15562839]
  18. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998 Jan;11(1):97-104 [PMID: 9487482]
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Aug 28;98(18):10344-9 [PMID: 11504914]
  20. Am Heart J. 1995 Oct;130(4):922-32 [PMID: 7572610]
  21. Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jul 1;94(1):92-5 [PMID: 15219514]
  22. Circulation. 2007 Jun 26;115(25):3165-72 [PMID: 17562958]
  23. Arch Intern Med. 2007 May 28;167(10):989-97 [PMID: 17533201]
  24. Circ Res. 1999 Aug 6;85(3):221-8 [PMID: 10436164]
  25. Lancet. 2004 Jul 10-16;364(9429):141-8 [PMID: 15246726]
  26. J Clin Invest. 2005 Mar;115(3):572-83 [PMID: 15765139]
  27. Circulation. 2005 Aug 30;112(9 Suppl):I157-65 [PMID: 16159809]
  28. Nat Med. 1996 Dec;2(12):1393-5 [PMID: 8946843]
  29. N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 21;355(12):1210-21 [PMID: 16990384]
  30. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Mar 20;134(6):451-8 [PMID: 11255520]
  31. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007 Feb;292(2):H1095-104 [PMID: 17056665]
  32. Circ Res. 2004 Oct 1;95(7):742-8 [PMID: 15358665]
  33. Circulation. 2005 Aug 30;112(9 Suppl):I150-6 [PMID: 16159808]
  34. Exp Hematol. 2008 Jun;36(6):672-80 [PMID: 18358589]
  35. N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 21;355(12):1199-209 [PMID: 16990383]
  36. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 May 21;41(10):1721-4 [PMID: 12767654]
  37. Basic Res Cardiol. 2002 Jul;97(4):268-75 [PMID: 12111036]
  38. Circulation. 2002 Oct 8;106(15):1913-8 [PMID: 12370212]
  39. Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):47-9 [PMID: 12517468]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Europe
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction
Myocardium
Prospective Studies
Single-Blind Method
Stem Cell Transplantation
Stroke Volume
Time Factors
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Function, Left

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0+/-0stemcells35AMIearlylatedeliveryejectionfractionmonths95%CIP=6%x10Combinedcelltherapymyocardialleftventricularchangesinfarctsize1%91respectivelyintracoronaryintramyocardialendpoints60mean-35%-1group47groups686deliveredsignificantBACKGROUND:administrationmightimproveoutcomesbone-marrow-derivedacuteinfarctioncomparedsafetyfeasibilitycombinedapproachesMETHODS:Patientsless45%randomlyassignedviainjectioninfusion3-6weeks3-4PrimaryRESULTS:totalpatientstreated-5001-60023-50030%7-60179-12remainedsignificantlyhigherbaseline2001948myocardium302941arteryhighnumberrequiredimprovementsprimaryCONCLUSIONS:cardiacinducesmoderateimprovementfunctionapproachbonemarrowmononuclearinfarction:MYSTARprospectiverandomizedstudy

Similar Articles

Cited By (47)