Smoking trends in the Nurses' Health Study (1976-2003).

Linda Sarna, Stella Aguinaga Bialous, Hee-Jin Jun, Mary Ellen Wewers, Mary E Cooley, Diane Feskanich
Author Information
  1. Linda Sarna: School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. lsarna@sonnet.ucla.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smoking trends among nurses are important to monitor as smoking negatively affects their health and decreases their likelihood of providing cessation interventions to patients.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to describe the changes in smoking trends in the participants in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) cohorts over 27 years.
METHODS: An analysis of biennial changes in smoking status and cigarette consumption within nine 5-year birth cohorts (1920-1924 to 1960-1964) and age-specific mortality rates by smoking status were examined in 237,648 female registered nurses (RNs): NHS (ages of 30-55 years in 1976, followed through 2002) and NHS II (ages of 25-42 years in 1989, followed through 2003).
RESULTS: Current smokers constituted 33.2% of NHS in 1976 and 13.5% of NHS II in 1989. Smoking rates declined in all birth cohorts; 8.4% were smoking in 2002/2003. Seventy-nine percent of nurses who ever smoked had quit. The mean cigarettes per day declined over time but still exceeded half a pack per day (15.1 cigarettes) at the end of follow-up. The mortality rate among current smokers was higher than that of former smokers and was approximately twice that of never smokers in all age categories; those who smoked were more likely to have comorbid conditions.
DISCUSSION: This study provides the first report of smoking trends among RNs in the NHS. The decline in smoking rate among female nurses mirrors the decline in smoking rate among women in the United States over the past 25 years. Increased mortality and morbidity rates indicate the devastating cost of smoking to the profession and can provide support for the urgent need for further research to encourage continued smoking cessation efforts for nursing professionals.

References

  1. Nurs Times. 2006 May 9-15;102(19):32-7 [PMID: 16711288]
  2. Res Nurs Health. 2005 Feb;28(1):79-90 [PMID: 15625705]
  3. Chest. 2003 Oct;124(4):1415-20 [PMID: 14555574]
  4. Am J Nurs. 1978 Jun;78(6):1039-40 [PMID: 248266]
  5. BMJ. 2004 Jun 26;328(7455):1519 [PMID: 15213107]
  6. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007 Sep 28;56(38):993-6 [PMID: 17898692]
  7. Int J Nurs Stud. 2000 Apr;37(2):173-81 [PMID: 10684959]
  8. Tob Control. 2005 Jun;14(3):172-80 [PMID: 15923467]
  9. Nurs Res. 2004 Nov-Dec;53(6):387-95 [PMID: 15586135]
  10. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007 Nov 9;56(44):1157-61 [PMID: 17989644]
  11. Nurs Res. 2002 Jul-Aug;51(4):245-53 [PMID: 12131237]
  12. Nurs Res. 2006 Jul-Aug;55(4 Suppl):S51-7 [PMID: 16829777]
  13. Subst Use Misuse. 2000 Aug;35(10):1443-69 [PMID: 10921434]
  14. JAMA. 1994 Apr 27;271(16):1273-5 [PMID: 8151902]
  15. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Apr 1;148(7):554-6 [PMID: 18378950]
  16. JAMA. 1996 Apr 24;275(16):1252-7 [PMID: 8601957]
  17. Am J Health Promot. 1994 Nov-Dec;9(2):108-14 [PMID: 10150711]
  18. Int J Nurs Stud. 1999 Aug;36(4):301-11 [PMID: 10404298]
  19. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Dec 1;140(11):1016-9 [PMID: 7985649]
  20. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005 Nov 11;54(44):1121-4 [PMID: 16280969]
  21. Am J Public Health. 1998 Apr;88(4):581-5 [PMID: 9550998]
  22. BMJ. 2002 Jul 27;325(7357):188 [PMID: 12142305]
  23. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2006 Mar;18(1):113-22, xiii [PMID: 16546014]
  24. Nurs Outlook. 2001 Jul-Aug;49(4):166-72 [PMID: 11514788]
  25. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 May;119(5):837-9 [PMID: 6720679]
  26. J Community Health Nurs. 2001 Summer;18(2):115-34 [PMID: 11407180]
  27. Tob Control. 2000 Mar;9(1):3-8 [PMID: 10691743]
  28. J Adv Nurs. 2000 May;31(5):1046-53 [PMID: 10840237]
  29. Am J Health Promot. 1988 Fall;3(2):26-35 [PMID: 10290496]
  30. Am J Public Health. 1987 May;77(5):628-30 [PMID: 3565664]
  31. Nurs Outlook. 2004 Mar-Apr;52(2):95-101 [PMID: 15073590]
  32. Am J Prev Med. 2004 Nov;27(4):316-22 [PMID: 15488362]
  33. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005 May 27;54(20):505-9 [PMID: 15917734]
  34. N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 12;356(15):1496-8 [PMID: 17429081]
  35. Am J Public Health. 1980 Aug;70(8):823-5 [PMID: 7416342]
  36. Nurse Educ Pract. 2007 Sep;7(5):293-302 [PMID: 17689456]
  37. Nurs Econ. 2006 Jan-Feb;24(1):6-12, 3 [PMID: 16583600]

Grants

  1. R01 CA050385/NCI NIH HHS
  2. K05 CA124415/NCI NIH HHS
  3. CA87979/NCI NIH HHS
  4. CA50385/NCI NIH HHS
  5. 1 K07 CA 92696-02/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Age Distribution
Cardiovascular Diseases
Chi-Square Distribution
Cohort Studies
Comorbidity
Cost of Illness
Female
Health Services Needs and Demand
Humans
Middle Aged
Mortality
Neoplasms
Nurses
Population Surveillance
Prevalence
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Risk Factors
Smoking
Smoking Prevention
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0smokingNHSamongtrendsnursesyearssmokersSmokingcohortsmortalityratesratecessationstudychangesNurses'HealthStudystatusbirthfemaleRNsages1976followedII1989declinedsmokedcigarettesperdaydeclineBACKGROUND:importantmonitornegativelyaffectshealthdecreaseslikelihoodprovidinginterventionspatientsOBJECTIVES:objectivedescribeparticipants27METHODS:analysisbiennialcigaretteconsumptionwithinnine5-year1920-19241960-1964age-specificexamined237648registered:30-55200225-422003RESULTS:Currentconstituted332%135%84%2002/2003Seventy-ninepercenteverquitmeantimestillexceededhalfpack151endfollow-upcurrenthigherformerapproximatelytwiceneveragecategorieslikelycomorbidconditionsDISCUSSION:providesfirstreportmirrorswomenUnitedStatespast25Increasedmorbidityindicatedevastatingcostprofessioncanprovidesupporturgentneedresearchencouragecontinuedeffortsnursingprofessionals1976-2003

Similar Articles

Cited By