Factors contributing to comodulation masking release with dichotic maskers.

Emily Buss, Joseph W Hall
Author Information
  1. Emily Buss: Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.

Abstract

Detection threshold for a pure tone signal centered in a narrow band of noise may be reduced by inclusion of additional flanking masker bands, provided that they share coherent amplitude modulation (AM) across frequency. This comodulation masking release (CMR) associated with coherent AM across frequency is often much smaller if the signal and on-signal masker are presented to one ear and the flanking masker band(s) are presented contralaterally. An experiment was carried out to explore the role of peripheral effects (e.g., suppression) and central effects (e.g., grouping) in this finding. As frequently reported, CMR was smaller when two or more flanking maskers were presented contralaterally to the signal than when presented ipsilaterally. An intermediate condition, where a subset of flanking maskers was presented to each ear, provided comparable benefit to presenting all flankers ipsilateral to the signal. This result suggests that central effects may play a significant role in the reduced dichotic CMR under some conditions.

References

  1. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Dec;104(6):3500-10 [PMID: 9857509]
  2. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Jan;87(1):269-83 [PMID: 2299038]
  3. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Aug;90(2 Pt 1):829-35 [PMID: 1939887]
  4. Hear Res. 1989 Oct;42(1):37-45 [PMID: 2584158]
  5. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Jan;85(1):262-72 [PMID: 2921408]
  6. Brain Res. 2008 Jul 18;1220:246-55 [PMID: 17825272]
  7. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Feb;81(2):452-8 [PMID: 3558962]
  8. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Jul;76(1):50-6 [PMID: 6747111]
  9. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Nov;98(5 Pt 1):2504-14 [PMID: 7593933]
  10. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Dec;82(6):1944-56 [PMID: 3429732]
  11. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Dec;120(6):3843-52 [PMID: 17225411]
  12. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 May;93(5):2896-902 [PMID: 8315153]
  13. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Jun;91(6):3456-70 [PMID: 1619122]
  14. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Apr;93(4 Pt 1):2106-15 [PMID: 8473623]
  15. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Jan;93(1):435-51 [PMID: 8423260]
  16. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+ [PMID: 5541744]
  17. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Jun;97(6):3768-74 [PMID: 7790654]
  18. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Nov;106(5):2733-45 [PMID: 10573889]

Grants

  1. R01 DC000418/NIDCD NIH HHS
  2. R01 DC000418-22/NIDCD NIH HHS
  3. R01 DC007391/NIDCD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Acoustic Stimulation
Adolescent
Adult
Auditory Pathways
Auditory Perception
Auditory Threshold
Dichotic Listening Tests
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Perceptual Masking
Psychoacoustics
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0presentedsignalflankingmaskerCMReffectsmaskersbandmayreducedprovidedcoherentAMacrossfrequencycomodulationmaskingreleasesmallerearcontralaterallyroleegcentraldichoticDetectionthresholdpuretonecenterednarrownoiseinclusionadditionalbandsshareamplitudemodulationassociatedoftenmuchon-signalonesexperimentcarriedexploreperipheralsuppressiongroupingfindingfrequentlyreportedtwoipsilaterallyintermediateconditionsubsetcomparablebenefitpresentingflankersipsilateralresultsuggestsplaysignificantconditionsFactorscontributing

Similar Articles

Cited By