Variability in the quality of overdose advice in Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) documents: gut decontamination recommendations for CNS drugs.

Andrew J B Wall, D N Bateman, W S Waring
Author Information
  1. Andrew J B Wall: Scottish Poisons Information Bureau, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Abstract

AIMS: Deliberate self-poisoning is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) document is a legal requirement for all drugs, and Section 4.9 addresses the features of toxicity and clinical advice on management of overdose. The quality and appropriateness of this advice have received comparatively little attention.
METHODS: Section 4.9 of the SPC was examined for all drugs in the central nervous system (CNS) category of the British National Formulary. Advice concerning gut decontamination was examined with respect to specific interventions: induced vomiting, oral activated charcoal, gastric lavage, and other interventions. Data were compared with standard reference sources for clinical management advice in poisoning. These were graded 'A' if no important differences existed, 'B' if differences were noted but not thought clinically important, and 'C' if differences were thought to be clinically significant.
RESULTS: SPC documents were examined for 258 medications from 67 manufacturers. The overall agreement was 'A' in 23 (8.9%), 'B' in 28 (10.9%) and 'C' in 207 (80.2%). Discrepancies were due to inappropriate recommendation of induced emesis in 21.7% (95% confidence interval 17.1, 27.1), gastric lavage in 38.4% (32.7, 44.4), other gut decontamination in 5.8% (3.6, 9.4) and failure to recommend oral activated charcoal in 57.4% (51.1, 63.4).
CONCLUSIONS: Gut decontamination advice in SPC documents with respect to CNS drugs was inadequate. Possible reasons for the observed discrepancies and ways of improving the consistency of advice are proposed.

References

  1. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42(7):933-43 [PMID: 15641639]
  2. Drug Ther Bull. 2001 Apr;39(4):25-7 [PMID: 11329796]
  3. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Feb;29(2):255-61 [PMID: 9018192]
  4. Clin Lab Med. 2006 Mar;26(1):1-12, vii [PMID: 16567222]
  5. Emerg Med J. 2006 Aug;23(8):614-7 [PMID: 16858093]
  6. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005 Jul;97(1):1-7 [PMID: 15943752]
  7. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1997;35(7):699-709 [PMID: 9482425]
  8. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov;82(5):566-71 [PMID: 17410119]
  9. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1997;35(7):711-9 [PMID: 9482426]
  10. Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Oct-Dec;17(5-6):511-9 [PMID: 16302945]
  11. Emerg Med J. 2006 Nov;23(11):854-7 [PMID: 17057137]
  12. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Dec;56(6):613-9 [PMID: 14616420]
  13. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007;45(1):45-50 [PMID: 17357381]
  14. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2005;43(2):61-87 [PMID: 15822758]
  15. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jul;61(5-6):327-35 [PMID: 15983822]
  16. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2007 May;100(5):353-5 [PMID: 17448123]
  17. J Med Toxicol. 2007 Sep;3(3):100-2 [PMID: 18072144]
  18. Health Stat Q. 2007 Winter;(36):66-72 [PMID: 18092542]
  19. Health Stat Q. 2007 Autumn;(35):72-7 [PMID: 17894200]
  20. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Feb;44(2):141-9 [PMID: 14747422]
  21. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999;:166-70 [PMID: 10566342]
  22. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Aug;64(2):192-7 [PMID: 17298480]
  23. Emerg Med J. 2008 Mar;25(3):140-3 [PMID: 18299359]

MeSH Term

Central Nervous System Agents
Charcoal
Drug Overdose
Gastric Lavage
Humans
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Vomiting

Chemicals

Central Nervous System Agents
Charcoal

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0adviceSPC4drugsdecontamination9examinedCNSgutdifferences1SummaryProductCharacteristicsSectionclinicalmanagementoverdosequalityrespectinducedoralactivatedcharcoalgastriclavage'A'important'B'thoughtclinically'C'documents9%4%AIMS:Deliberateself-poisoningmajorcausemorbiditymortalitydocumentlegalrequirementaddressesfeaturestoxicityappropriatenessreceivedcomparativelylittleattentionMETHODS:centralnervoussystemcategoryBritishNationalFormularyAdviceconcerningspecificinterventions:vomitinginterventionsDatacomparedstandardreferencesourcespoisoninggradedexistednotedsignificantRESULTS:258medications67manufacturersoverallagreement2382810207802%Discrepanciesdueinappropriaterecommendationemesis217%95%confidenceinterval1727383274458%36failurerecommend575163CONCLUSIONS:GutinadequatePossiblereasonsobserveddiscrepancieswaysimprovingconsistencyproposedVariabilitydocuments:recommendations

Similar Articles

Cited By