The effect of fruit in different forms on energy intake and satiety at a meal.

Julie E Flood-Obbagy, Barbara J Rolls
Author Information
  1. Julie E Flood-Obbagy: Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 226 Henderson Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Abstract

Consuming whole fruit reduces ratings of satiety more than fruit juice, but little is known about the effects of different forms of fruit on subsequent energy intake. This study tested how consuming preloads of apples in different forms prior to a meal (apple, applesauce, and apple juice with and without added fiber) influences satiety and energy intake at meal. Preloads were matched for weight, energy content, energy density, and ingestion rate. Once a week for 5 weeks, 58 adults consumed one of four preloads (266 g; 125 kcal [523 kJ]), or no preload (control), followed by a test meal consumed ad libitum 15 min later. Results showed that eating apple reduced lunch energy intake (preload+test meal) by 15% (187+/-36 kcal [782+/-151 kJ]) compared to control (p<0.0001) and decreased energy intake compared to applesauce and both juices. Fullness ratings differed significantly after preload consumption (apple>applesauce>both juices>control). Overall, whole apple increased satiety more than applesauce or apple juice. Adding naturally occurring levels of fiber to juice did not enhance satiety. These results suggest that solid fruit affects satiety more than pureed fruit or juice, and that eating fruit at the start of a meal can reduce energy intake.

References

  1. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(1):71-83 [PMID: 3981480]
  2. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Apr;32(4):676-83 [PMID: 18071342]
  3. J Am Coll Nutr. 1997 Oct;16(5):423-8 [PMID: 9322190]
  4. Nutr Rev. 2001 May;59(5):129-39 [PMID: 11396693]
  5. Physiol Behav. 1984 Feb;32(2):319-32 [PMID: 6718557]
  6. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2000 Jan;51(1):59-71 [PMID: 10746106]
  7. Appetite. 1990 Oct;15(2):115-26 [PMID: 2268137]
  8. Lancet. 1977 Oct 1;2(8040):679-82 [PMID: 71495]
  9. Appetite. 2007 Nov;49(3):626-34 [PMID: 17574705]
  10. Nutr Rev. 2004 Jan;62(1):1-17 [PMID: 14995052]
  11. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 May;105(5 Suppl 1):S98-103 [PMID: 15867904]
  12. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jun;85(6):1465-77 [PMID: 17556681]
  13. Physiol Behav. 2004 Sep 30;82(4):671-7 [PMID: 15327915]
  14. J Nutr. 2000 Feb;130(2S Suppl):272S-275S [PMID: 10721886]
  15. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 May;85(5):1212-21 [PMID: 17490955]
  16. Am J Physiol. 1996 Jun;270(6 Pt 2):R1371-9 [PMID: 8764306]
  17. Physiol Behav. 1990 Jul;48(1):19-26 [PMID: 2236270]
  18. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004 Oct;104(10):1570-6 [PMID: 15389416]
  19. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Apr;106(4):550-7 [PMID: 16567151]
  20. Appetite. 2005 Apr;44(2):187-93 [PMID: 15808893]
  21. Appetite. 1998 Aug;31(1):67-81 [PMID: 9716436]
  22. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Jun;24(6):794-800 [PMID: 10878689]
  23. Physiol Behav. 2005 Jan 17;83(5):739-47 [PMID: 15639159]
  24. Psychol Med. 1982 Nov;12(4):871-8 [PMID: 6961471]
  25. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 Mar;26(3):384-8 [PMID: 11896494]
  26. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981 Feb;34(2):211-7 [PMID: 6259919]
  27. Am J Physiol. 1993 Dec;265(6 Pt 2):R1223-30 [PMID: 8285261]
  28. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Aug;106(8):1172-80 [PMID: 16863711]
  29. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Dec;106(12):1984-90; discussion 1990-1 [PMID: 17126628]
  30. Physiol Behav. 2003 Sep;79(4-5):767-73 [PMID: 12954421]
  31. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991 May;53(5):1159-64 [PMID: 2021127]

Grants

  1. R37 DK039177/NIDDK NIH HHS
  2. R37 DK039177-19/NIDDK NIH HHS
  3. DK039177/NIDDK NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Beverages
Body Mass Index
Cooking
Dietary Fiber
Eating
Energy Intake
Energy Metabolism
Female
Fruit
Humans
Hunger
Malus
Middle Aged
Obesity
Overweight
Satiety Response
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0energyfruitsatietyintakemealjuiceappledifferentformsapplesaucewholeratingspreloadsfiberconsumedkcalkJ]preloadcontroleatingcomparedConsumingreduceslittleknowneffectssubsequentstudytestedconsumingapplespriorwithoutaddedinfluencesPreloadsmatchedweightcontentdensityingestionrateweek5weeks58adultsonefour266g125[523followedtestadlibitum15minlaterResultsshowedreducedlunchpreload+test15%187+/-36[782+/-151p<00001decreasedjuicesFullnessdifferedsignificantlyconsumptionapple>applesauce>bothjuices>controlOverallincreasedAddingnaturallyoccurringlevelsenhanceresultssuggestsolidaffectspureedstartcanreduceeffect

Similar Articles

Cited By