The relationship between cerebral hemisphere volume and receptive language functioning in dyslexia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Michelle Y Kibby, Shital P Pavawalla, Jill B Fancher, Angela J Naillon, George W Hynd
Author Information
  1. Michelle Y Kibby: Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University - Carbondale, 1125 Lincoln Drive, LSII Room 281, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, USA. mkibby@siu.edu

Abstract

Because poor comprehension has been associated with small cerebral volume and there is a high comorbidity between developmental dyslexia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and specific language impairment, the goal of this study was to determine whether cerebral volume is reduced in dyslexia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in general, as some suggest, or whether the reduction in volume corresponds to poor receptive language functioning, regardless of the diagnosis. Participants included 46 children with and without dyslexia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, aged 8 to 12 years. Our results indicated that cerebral volume was comparable between those with and without dyslexia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder overall. However, when groups were further divided into those with and without receptive language difficulties, children with poor receptive language had smaller volumes bilaterally as hypothesized. Nonetheless, the relationship between cerebral volume and receptive language was not linear; rather, our results suggest that small volume is associated with poor receptive language only in those with the smallest volumes in both dyslexia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

References

  1. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2001 Jun;35(3):272-81 [PMID: 11437799]
  2. J Speech Hear Res. 1990 Mar;33(1):70-83 [PMID: 2314086]
  3. Ann Dyslexia. 1994 Jan;44(1):1-25 [PMID: 24234044]
  4. Brain. 1996 Oct;119 ( Pt 5):1763-74 [PMID: 8931596]
  5. J Learn Disabil. 1992 Dec;25(10):618-29 [PMID: 1460383]
  6. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2003 Aug;31(4):427-43 [PMID: 12831231]
  7. Neuropsychologia. 1976;14(4):471-9 [PMID: 995240]
  8. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;41(5):637-44 [PMID: 10946755]
  9. J Learn Disabil. 2004 Jul-Aug;37(4):349-63 [PMID: 15493406]
  10. J Commun Disord. 2002 Nov-Dec;35(6):501-31 [PMID: 12443050]
  11. Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Jul 1;2(7):240-7 [PMID: 21244922]
  12. Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):122-35 [PMID: 15010244]
  13. J Speech Hear Res. 1994 Aug;37(4):824-30 [PMID: 7967569]
  14. Psychol Bull. 2004 Nov;130(6):858-86 [PMID: 15535741]
  15. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;42(2):189-98 [PMID: 11280415]
  16. Child Neuropsychol. 2008 Nov;14(6):525-46 [PMID: 18608219]
  17. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Jan;12(1):223-32 [PMID: 10769318]
  18. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Jun 14;682:27-47 [PMID: 7686725]
  19. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Jun 15;61(12):1361-9 [PMID: 16950217]
  20. Neuropsychologia. 1974 Jan;12(1):83-93 [PMID: 4821193]
  21. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996 Mar;35(3):325-33 [PMID: 8714321]
  22. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Aug;26(4):433-44 [PMID: 16480802]
  23. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Oct;3(10):767-80 [PMID: 12360321]
  24. Brain. 2006 Dec;129(Pt 12):3329-42 [PMID: 17012292]
  25. Ann Dyslexia. 1991 Jan;41(1):221-45 [PMID: 24233767]
  26. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2000;6(3):198-206 [PMID: 10982497]
  27. J Learn Disabil. 1986 Aug-Sep;19(7):426-31 [PMID: 3746127]
  28. J Neurosci Methods. 1990 Nov;35(2):115-24 [PMID: 2283883]
  29. Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Feb;70(2):384-98 [PMID: 11791209]
  30. J Learn Disabil. 1984 Dec;17(10):592-9 [PMID: 6512404]
  31. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000 Oct;41(7):847-57 [PMID: 11079427]
  32. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Dec;40(6):1272-84 [PMID: 9430748]
  33. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Oct 15;52(8):785-94 [PMID: 12372650]
  34. J Learn Disabil. 1996 May;29(3):247-58 [PMID: 8732886]
  35. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;43(3):332-40 [PMID: 15076267]
  36. Brain. 2003 Feb;126(Pt 2):482-94 [PMID: 12538414]
  37. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000 Sep;10(1-2):37-44 [PMID: 10978690]
  38. Arch Neurol. 1991 May;48(5):539-45 [PMID: 2021369]
  39. Neurology. 1997 Mar;48(3):589-601 [PMID: 9065532]
  40. Cognition. 1996 Feb;58(2):157-95 [PMID: 8820386]
  41. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Jun-Jul;22(6):1161-7 [PMID: 11415913]
  42. J Child Neurol. 2004 Apr;19(4):275-81 [PMID: 15163094]
  43. Cereb Cortex. 2001 Feb;11(2):148-57 [PMID: 11208669]
  44. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;15(1):52-60 [PMID: 16514510]
  45. Brain Lang. 1976 Jan;3(1):1-15 [PMID: 773516]
  46. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1985 Mar;13(1):155-67 [PMID: 3973249]
  47. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Oct 29;346(1315):21-7 [PMID: 7886149]

Grants

  1. R03 HD048752/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R01 HD026890-08/NICHD NIH HHS
  3. R01 HD026890/NICHD NIH HHS
  4. R03 HD048752-02/NICHD NIH HHS
  5. R01 HD26890/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Causality
Cerebral Cortex
Child
Dyslexia
Female
Functional Laterality
Humans
Language
Language Tests
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Nervous System Malformations
Neuropsychological Tests
Organ Size
Predictive Value of Tests
Speech Perception
Verbal Behavior

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0volumelanguagedyslexiaattention-deficithyperactivitydisorderreceptivecerebralpoorwithoutassociatedsmallADHDwhethersuggestfunctioningchildrenresultsvolumesrelationshipcomprehensionhighcomorbiditydevelopmentalspecificimpairmentgoalstudydeterminereducedgeneralreductioncorrespondsregardlessdiagnosisParticipantsincluded46aged812yearsindicatedcomparableoverallHowevergroupsdivideddifficultiessmallerbilaterallyhypothesizedNonethelesslinearrathersmallesthemisphere

Similar Articles

Cited By