Evaluation of a communication skills program for first-year medical students at the University of Toronto.

Solomon M Shapiro, William J Lancee, Christopher M Richards-Bentley
Author Information
  1. Solomon M Shapiro: Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada. solomon_shapiro@camh.net

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective doctor-patient communication has been linked to numerous benefits for both patient and physician. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the University of Toronto's Therapeutic Communication Program (TCom) at improving first-year medical students' communication skills.
METHODS: Data were collected during the 1996/97, 1997/98, 1998/99 and 1999/00 academic years. The study used a repeated measures design with a waiting list control group: students were randomly assigned to groups starting the educational intervention in either September (N = 38) or February (N = 41), with the latter being used as a control for the former. Communication skills were assessed at the pre- and post-intervention times and at the end of the academic year from the perspectives of student, standardized patient and external rater.
RESULTS: Only the external rater, using an instrument designed to assess the students' empathy based on their written responses, showed a time x group interaction effect (p = 0.039), thereby partially supporting the hypothesis that TCom improved the students' communication skills. Students rated themselves less positively after participation in the program (p = 0.038), suggesting that self-evaluation was an ineffective measure of actual performance or that the program helped them learn to more accurately assess their abilities.
CONCLUSION: The lack of strong findings may be partly due to the study's small sample sizes. Further research at other medical or professional schools could assess the effectiveness of similar courses on students' communication skills and on other capacities that were not measured in this study, such as their understanding of and comfort with patients, their management of the doctor-patient relationship, and their ability to give and receive feedback.

References

  1. J Law Med Ethics. 2000 Fall;28(3):258-66 [PMID: 11210378]
  2. Med Teach. 2005 Sep;27(6):539-43 [PMID: 16199362]
  3. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Dec 15;49(6):810-8 [PMID: 14673968]
  4. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1990 Oct;178(10):649-54 [PMID: 2230750]
  5. Acad Med. 1991 Sep;66(9 Suppl):S34-6 [PMID: 1930521]
  6. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):242-8 [PMID: 16597495]
  7. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1989 Aug;40(8):815-9 [PMID: 2759571]
  8. Arch Intern Med. 1989 Oct;149(10):2190-6 [PMID: 2802885]
  9. Can Fam Physician. 1990 Oct;36:1711-6 [PMID: 21233993]
  10. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Dec;20(12):1108-13 [PMID: 16423099]
  11. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Dec;55(6):991-1008 [PMID: 3216292]
  12. Med Teach. 1999;21(6):563-70 [PMID: 21281175]
  13. JAMA. 1993 Apr 28;269(16):2101-5 [PMID: 8468764]
  14. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Sep;58(3):265-70 [PMID: 16023822]
  15. Med Educ. 1992 Jan;26(1):63-8 [PMID: 1538660]
  16. Acad Med. 2005 Feb;80(2):118-24 [PMID: 15671313]
  17. J Med Educ. 1972 Aug;47(8):645-51 [PMID: 4403491]
  18. Acad Med. 1993 Apr;68(4):285-94 [PMID: 8466612]
  19. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Jun 14;292(6535):1573-6 [PMID: 3719282]

MeSH Term

Adult
Clinical Competence
Communication
Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Female
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Ontario
Physician-Patient Relations
Program Evaluation
Schools, Medical
Students, Medical
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0communicationskillsstudents'=studymedicalassessprogramdoctor-patientpatienteffectivenessUniversityCommunicationTComfirst-yearacademicusedcontrolstudentsNexternalraterp0BACKGROUND:EffectivelinkednumerousbenefitsphysicianpurposeevaluateToronto'sTherapeuticProgramimprovingMETHODS:Datacollected1996/971997/981998/991999/00yearsrepeatedmeasuresdesignwaitinglistgroup:randomlyassignedgroupsstartingeducationalinterventioneitherSeptember38February41latterformerassessedpre-post-interventiontimesendyearperspectivesstudentstandardizedRESULTS:usinginstrumentdesignedempathybasedwrittenresponsesshowedtimexgroupinteractioneffect039therebypartiallysupportinghypothesisimprovedStudentsratedlesspositivelyparticipation038suggestingself-evaluationineffectivemeasureactualperformancehelpedlearnaccuratelyabilitiesCONCLUSION:lackstrongfindingsmaypartlyduestudy'ssmallsamplesizesresearchprofessionalschoolssimilarcoursescapacitiesmeasuredunderstandingcomfortpatientsmanagementrelationshipabilitygivereceivefeedbackEvaluationToronto

Similar Articles

Cited By