Focused abdominal sonography for trauma in the emergency department for blunt abdominal trauma.

Chi Leung Tsui, Hin Tat Fung, Kin Lai Chung, Chak Wah Kam
Author Information
  1. Chi Leung Tsui: Accident and Emergency Department, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, cltsui333@netvigator.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) is a diagnostic challenge to the emergency physician (EP). The introduction of bedside ultrasound provides another diagnostic tool for the EP to detect intra-abdominal injuries.
AIMS: To evaluate the performance of EP in a local emergency department in Hong Kong to perform the 'focused abdominal sonography for trauma' (FAST) in BAT patients.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including all the trauma team cases in a 36-month period in the emergency department of a public hospital in Hong Kong. The results of FAST scans were analyzed and compared with CT scans when the FAST was positive or followed by a period of clinical observation when the FAST was negative. Descriptive statistics and sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated.
RESULTS: There was a total of 273 cases, and FAST scans were performed in 242 cases. The sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 99%, respectively. The negative predictive value was 0.98, while the positive predictive value was 0.94. The overall accuracy was 97%.
CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the EP in using FAST scans in BAT patients was encouraging. The high specificity (99%), positive predictive value (0.98), and likelihood ratio for positive tests (86) make it a good 'rule in' tool for BAT patients. The high negative predictive value also makes the FAST scan a useful screening tool. However, ultrasound examination is operator dependent, and FAST scan has its own limitations. For negative FAST scan cases, we recommend a period of monitoring, serial FAST scans, or further investigations, such as CT scan or peritoneal lavage.

References

  1. J Trauma. 2003 Jan;54(1):52-9; discussion 59-60 [PMID: 12544899]
  2. Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;48(4):487-510 [PMID: 16997700]
  3. J Trauma. 1999 Apr;46(4):553-62; discussion 562-4 [PMID: 10217217]
  4. Am Surg. 2001 Apr;67(4):364-8 [PMID: 11308006]
  5. Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Sep;48(3):227-35 [PMID: 16934640]
  6. J Trauma. 1997 Apr;42(4):617-23; discussion 623-5 [PMID: 9137247]
  7. J Trauma. 1998 Jul;45(1):45-50; discussion 50-1 [PMID: 9680011]
  8. Radiology. 1970 Jul;96(1):15-22 [PMID: 5420399]
  9. Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Mar;43(3):354-61 [PMID: 14985663]
  10. J Trauma. 2001 Apr;50(4):650-4; discussion 654-6 [PMID: 11303159]
  11. J Trauma. 1995 Aug;39(2):375-80 [PMID: 7674411]
  12. J Ultrasound Med. 1997 Oct;16(10):653-62; quiz 663-4 [PMID: 9323670]
  13. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Oct;38(4):469-70 [PMID: 11574809]
  14. J Trauma. 1999 Mar;46(3):466-72 [PMID: 10088853]
  15. J Trauma. 2002 Jul;53(1):28-32 [PMID: 12131385]
  16. J Trauma. 1995 Sep;39(3):492-8; discussion 498-500 [PMID: 7473914]
  17. J Trauma. 2007 Mar;62(3):779-84 [PMID: 17414368]
  18. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2005 Mar;11(1):41-4 [PMID: 15795843]
  19. Acta Chir Scand. 1971;137(7):653-7 [PMID: 5149152]
  20. Radiographics. 1999 Sep-Oct;19(5):1332-9 [PMID: 10489185]
  21. J Trauma. 1965 Jan;5:53-61 [PMID: 14255175]
  22. J Trauma. 1999 Oct;47(4):632-7 [PMID: 10528595]
  23. J Trauma. 1994 Feb;36(2):173-7 [PMID: 8114130]
  24. J Trauma. 2000 May;48(5):902-6 [PMID: 10823534]
  25. J Trauma. 2001 Jan;50(1):108-12 [PMID: 11231679]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0FASTscanspredictiveabdominaltraumaBATemergencyEPcasespositivenegativevaluescantooldepartmentpatientsperiodspecificity0diagnosticultrasoundperformanceHongKongsonographyCTsensitivity99%98highBACKGROUND:Bluntchallengephysicianintroductionbedsideprovidesanotherdetectintra-abdominalinjuriesAIMS:evaluatelocalperform'focusedtrauma'METHODS:retrospectivecohortstudyincludingteam36-monthpublichospitalresultsanalyzedcomparedfollowedclinicalobservationDescriptivestatisticsvaluescalculatedRESULTS:total273performed24286%respectively94overallaccuracy97%CONCLUSIONS:usingencouraginglikelihoodratiotests86makegood'rulein'alsomakesusefulscreeningHoweverexaminationoperatordependentlimitationsrecommendmonitoringserialinvestigationsperitoneallavageFocusedblunt

Similar Articles

Cited By