A stimulus-control account of dysregulated drug intake.

Leigh V Panlilio, Eric B Thorndike, Charles W Schindler
Author Information
  1. Leigh V Panlilio: Preclinical Pharmacology Section, Behavioral Neuroscience Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH/DHHS, 251 Bayview Blvd, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. lpanlili@intra.nida.nih.gov

Abstract

Drug self-administration typically occurs in a regular temporal pattern, with a consistent pause following each injection. We have proposed that this patterning results from differential reinforcement of post-injection pausing. In this view, even when every response produces an injection, some injections are not reinforcing because they occur when the level of drug effect is already maximal; consequently, drug reinforcement occurs on an intermittent schedule, and the interoceptive drug effect functions as a cue, indicating when another injection will be reinforcing. Previously, we emulated this situation with rats by using food reinforcement; each response was recorded as delivering a "virtual" injection, and a visual cue tracked the virtual drug level to indicate availability of reinforcement. This emulation schedule produced response patterns strikingly similar to actual drug self-administration. In the present study, the emulation schedule was modified to determine whether reinforcement of pausing is sufficient to produce these patterns, or whether a cue is necessary. Without a cue, response patterns were irregular and virtual drug intake was escalated. These results suggest that a failure of interoceptive cues to control pausing might contribute to the dysregulated drug intake that is associated with addiction.

References

  1. Brain Res. 1999 Aug 21;839(1):85-93 [PMID: 10482802]
  2. Psychopharmacologia. 1974 Jan 14;34(3):255-64 [PMID: 4819978]
  3. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Oct;146(3):303-12 [PMID: 10541731]
  4. Science. 1998 Oct 9;282(5387):298-300 [PMID: 9765157]
  5. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Feb;196(3):441-50 [PMID: 17957355]
  6. J Neurosci. 1999 May 15;19(10):4102-9 [PMID: 10234038]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Mar;73(2):211-24 [PMID: 10784010]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):43-57 [PMID: 5778314]
  9. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000 Feb;148(3):289-98 [PMID: 10755742]
  10. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Apr;167(1):9-19 [PMID: 12644888]
  11. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Jun;125(3):202-8 [PMID: 8815954]
  12. Behav Pharmacol. 1991 Nov;2(4 And 5):283-286 [PMID: 11224071]
  13. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2006 Jun;84(2):235-43 [PMID: 16814853]
  14. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1999 Oct;64(2):337-45 [PMID: 10515310]
  15. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Jul;180(3):473-90 [PMID: 15731896]
  16. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1989 Feb;32(2):527-31 [PMID: 2727015]
  17. Pharmacology. 2007;80(2-3):65-119 [PMID: 17570954]
  18. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007 Mar;32(3):646-57 [PMID: 16738542]
  19. JAMA. 1985 Jul 5;254(1):81-3 [PMID: 4039767]
  20. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1993 Sep;33(2):119-28 [PMID: 8261876]

Grants

  1. Z01 DA000001-23/Intramural NIH HHS
  2. Z99 DA999999/Intramural NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Male
Motivation
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Self Administration

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0drugreinforcementinjectionresponsecuepausingschedulepatternsintakeself-administrationoccursresultsreinforcingleveleffectinteroceptivevirtualemulationwhetherdysregulatedDrugtypicallyregulartemporalpatternconsistentpausefollowingproposedpatterningdifferentialpost-injectionvieweveneveryproducesinjectionsoccuralreadymaximalconsequentlyintermittentfunctionsindicatinganotherwillPreviouslyemulatedsituationratsusingfoodrecordeddelivering"virtual"visualtrackedindicateavailabilityproducedstrikinglysimilaractualpresentstudymodifieddeterminesufficientproducenecessaryWithoutirregularescalatedsuggestfailurecuescontrolmightcontributeassociatedaddictionstimulus-controlaccount

Similar Articles

Cited By