Optimized antidepressant therapy and pain self-management in primary care patients with depression and musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Kurt Kroenke, Matthew J Bair, Teresa M Damush, Jingwei Wu, Shawn Hoke, Jason Sutherland, Wanzhu Tu
Author Information
  1. Kurt Kroenke: Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA. kkroenke@regenstrief.org

Abstract

CONTEXT: pain and depression are the most common physical and psychological symptoms in primary care, respectively. Moreover, they co-occur 30% to 50% of the time and have adverse effects on quality of life, disability, and health care costs.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if a combined pharmacological and behavioral intervention improves both depression and pain in primary care PATIENTS with musculoskeletal pain and comorbid depression.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized controlled trial (Stepped Care for Affective Disorders and Musculoskeletal pain [SCAMP]) conducted at 6 community-based clinics and 5 Veterans Affairs general medicine clinics in Indianapolis, Indiana. Recruitment occurred from January 2005 to June 2007 and follow-up concluded in June 2008. The 250 PATIENTS had low back, hip, or knee pain for 3 months or longer and at least moderate depression severity (Patient Health Questionnaire 9 score > or = 10).
INTERVENTION: PATIENTS were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 123) or to usual care (n = 127). The intervention consisted of 12 weeks of optimized antidepressant therapy (step 1) followed by 6 sessions of a pain self-management program over 12 weeks (step 2), and a continuation phase of therapy for 6 months (step 3).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: depression (20-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist), pain severity and interference (Brief pain Inventory), and global improvement in pain at 12 months.
RESULTS: At 12 months, 46 of the 123 intervention PATIENTS (37.4%) had a 50% or greater reduction in depression severity from baseline compared with 21 of 127 usual care PATIENTS (16.5%) (relative risk [RR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-3.2), corresponding to a much lower number of PATIENTS with major depression (50 [40.7%] vs 87 [68.5%], respectively; RR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.4-0.8]). Also, a clinically significant (> or = 30%) reduction in pain was much more likely in intervention PATIENTS (51 intervention PATIENTS [41.5%] vs 22 usual care PATIENTS [17.3%]; RR, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.6-3.2]), as was global improvement in pain (58 [47.2%] vs 16 [12.6%], respectively; RR, 3.7 [95% CI, 2.3-6.1]). More intervention PATIENTS also experienced benefits in terms of the primary outcome, which was a combined improvement in both depression and pain (32 intervention PATIENTS [26.0%] vs 10 usual care PATIENTS [7.9%]; RR, 3.3 [95% CI, 1.8-5.4]).
CONCLUSION: Optimized antidepressant therapy followed by a pain self-management program resulted in substantial improvement in depression as well as moderate reductions in pain severity and disability.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00118430.

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT00118430

References

  1. JAMA. 2007 Sep 26;298(12):1401-11 [PMID: 17895456]
  2. JAMA. 2009 Mar 25;301(12):1242-52 [PMID: 19318652]
  3. Ann Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(1):1-7 [PMID: 12867348]
  4. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2005;28(3):67-73 [PMID: 16386168]
  5. Health Educ Q. 1993 Spring;20(1):17-28 [PMID: 8444622]
  6. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Oct 3;145(7):544-6 [PMID: 17015873]
  7. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Nov 10;163(20):2433-45 [PMID: 14609780]
  8. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13 [PMID: 11556941]
  9. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Nov;74(11):1587-9 [PMID: 14617727]
  10. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7 [PMID: 16717171]
  11. Psychother Psychosom. 2000 Jul-Aug;69(4):205-15 [PMID: 10867588]
  12. Pain. 1992 Aug;50(2):133-149 [PMID: 1408309]
  13. J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Jun;12(6):384-9 [PMID: 9192257]
  14. Vital Health Stat 13. 1992 Apr;(110):1-80 [PMID: 1376543]
  15. Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):911-7 [PMID: 11346328]
  16. J Health Soc Behav. 1997 Mar;38(1):21-37 [PMID: 9097506]
  17. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Sep 20;143(6):427-38 [PMID: 16172441]
  18. BMJ. 2004 Sep 11;329(7466):602 [PMID: 15345600]
  19. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2009 May-Jun;31(3):206-19 [PMID: 19410099]
  20. JAMA. 2000 Sep 27;284(12):1519-26 [PMID: 11000645]
  21. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Apr 15;49(2):179-86 [PMID: 12687508]
  22. Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):9-19 [PMID: 15621359]
  23. Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):247-63 [PMID: 8450681]
  24. JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2443-54 [PMID: 14612481]
  25. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;62(12):1313-20 [PMID: 16330719]
  26. N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 23;354(12):1243-52 [PMID: 16554526]
  27. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(4):CD001312 [PMID: 11034712]
  28. Pain. 2008 Jan;134(1-2):209-15 [PMID: 18022319]
  29. Psychosomatics. 2008 May-Jun;49(3):191-8 [PMID: 18448772]
  30. N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 23;354(12):1231-42 [PMID: 16554525]
  31. J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21 [PMID: 18055266]
  32. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Mar;8(2):141-4 [PMID: 6222486]
  33. Pain. 1986 Oct;27(1):69-80 [PMID: 3785965]
  34. J Palliat Med. 2006 Dec;9(6):1454-73 [PMID: 17187552]
  35. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 18;144(8):617; author reply 617-8 [PMID: 16618959]
  36. JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3135-44 [PMID: 12813119]
  37. JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3152-60 [PMID: 12813121]
  38. Pain. 1992 Aug;50(2):157-162 [PMID: 1408311]
  39. Pain. 2000 Dec 1;88(3):287-294 [PMID: 11068116]
  40. Med Care. 2003 Jun;41(6):699-701 [PMID: 12773834]
  41. Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1194-201 [PMID: 15550799]
  42. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Aug;47(4):372-9 [PMID: 12209482]
  43. JAMA. 1995 Nov 15;274(19):1511-7 [PMID: 7474219]
  44. JAMA. 1994 Dec 14;272(22):1749-56 [PMID: 7966923]
  45. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2003;12(1):34-43 [PMID: 12830308]
  46. Lancet. 2004 Oct 23-29;364(9444):1523-37 [PMID: 15500899]
  47. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Aug;48(8):2207-13 [PMID: 12905474]
  48. Am J Manag Care. 2008 Feb;14(2):95-100 [PMID: 18269305]
  49. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2001 Jan;26(1):30-6 [PMID: 11212591]
  50. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 27;166(21):2314-21 [PMID: 17130383]
  51. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Nov-Dec;29(6):506-17 [PMID: 18022044]
  52. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Mar-Apr;29(2):91-116 [PMID: 17336659]
  53. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1905-17 [PMID: 17074942]
  54. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Mar 6;146(5):317-25 [PMID: 17339617]
  55. JAMA. 2002 Dec 11;288(22):2836-45 [PMID: 12472325]
  56. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Nov 24;163(21):2632-8 [PMID: 14638564]
  57. JAMA. 1998 Nov 18;280(19):1690-1 [PMID: 9832001]
  58. CNS Spectr. 2006 Mar;11(3):212-22 [PMID: 16575378]
  59. JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2428-9 [PMID: 14612479]
  60. N Engl J Med. 1994 Mar 3;330(9):592-6 [PMID: 7508092]
  61. JAMA. 2001 Dec 19;286(23):2947-55 [PMID: 11743835]
  62. Aust J Physiother. 2000;46(4):309-313 [PMID: 11676816]
  63. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Oct;21(10):1125-7 [PMID: 16970563]
  64. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;56(12):1109-15 [PMID: 10591288]
  65. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;15(8):699-707 [PMID: 17670998]

Grants

  1. R01 MH071268/NIMH NIH HHS
  2. R01 MH071268-01/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. R01 MH-071268/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Antidepressive Agents
Chronic Disease
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Comorbidity
Depressive Disorder, Major
Female
Hip Joint
Humans
Knee Joint
Low Back Pain
Male
Middle Aged
Pain
Pain Management
Pain Measurement
Primary Health Care
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Self Care

Chemicals

Antidepressive Agents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0painpatientsdepressioncareintervention32primary6monthsseverity=usual12therapy1improvementvsRR[95%CIPainrespectivelyantidepressantstepself-management30%50%disabilitycombinedmusculoskeletalcontrolledtrialclinicsJunemoderate>10n123127weeksfollowedprogramglobalreduction16much5%]0OptimizedCONTEXT:commonphysicalpsychologicalsymptomsMoreoverco-occurtimeadverseeffectsqualitylifehealthcostsOBJECTIVE:determinepharmacologicalbehavioralimprovescomorbidDESIGNSETTINGANDPATIENTS:RandomizedSteppedCareAffectiveDisordersMusculoskeletal[SCAMP]conductedcommunity-based5VeteransAffairsgeneralmedicineIndianapolisIndianaRecruitmentoccurredJanuary20052007follow-upconcluded2008250lowbackhipkneelongerleastPatientHealthQuestionnaire9scoreINTERVENTION:PatientsrandomlyassignedconsistedoptimizedsessionscontinuationphaseMAINOUTCOMEMEASURES:Depression20-itemHopkinsSymptomChecklistinterferenceBriefInventoryRESULTS:46374%greaterbaselinecompared215%relativerisk[RR]95%confidenceinterval[CI]5-3correspondinglowernumbermajor50[407%]87[684-08]Alsoclinicallysignificantlikely51[4122[173%]46-32]58[472%][126%]73-61]alsoexperiencedbenefitstermsoutcome32[260%][79%]8-54]CONCLUSION:resultedsubstantialwellreductionsTRIALREGISTRATION:clinicaltrialsgovIdentifier:NCT00118430pain:randomized

Similar Articles

Cited By (170)