Mycobacterium microti: More diverse than previously thought.

N H Smith, T Crawshaw, J Parry, R J Birtles
Author Information
  1. N H Smith: VLA Weybridge, New Haw, Surrey, United Kingdom. Noel@Sussex.ac.uk

Abstract

Mycobacterium microti is a member of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex of bacteria. This species was originally identified as a pathogen of small rodents and shrews and was associated with limited diversity and a much reduced spoligotype pattern. More recently, specific deletions of chromosomal DNA have been shown to define this group of organisms, which can be identified by the absence of chromosomal region RD1(mic). We describe here the molecular characteristics of 141 strains of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolated in Great Britain over a 14-year period. All strains have characteristic loss of some spoligotype spacers and characteristic alleles at the ETR-E and ETR-F variable-number tandem-repeat (VNTR) loci, and a sample of these strains was deleted for regions RD7, RD9, and RD1(mic) but intact for regions RD4 and RD12. We therefore identified these strains as M. microti and show that they have much more diverse spoligotype patterns and VNTR types than previously thought. The most common source of these strains was domestic cats, and we show that the molecular types of M. microti are geographically localized in the same way that molecular types of Mycobacterium bovis are geographically localized in cattle in the United Kingdom. We describe the pathology of M. microti infection in cats and suggest that the feline disease is a spillover from a disease maintained in an unknown wild mammal, probably field voles. The location of the cats with M. microti infection suggests that they do not overlap geographically with the strains of Mycobacterium bovis in Great Britain.

References

  1. Infection. 2005 Oct;33(5-6):393-6 [PMID: 16258876]
  2. Br J Ind Med. 1961 Apr;18:148-52 [PMID: 13733457]
  3. Vet Rec. 2006 Jul 8;159(2):59-60 [PMID: 16829603]
  4. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008 Aug;32(5):821-41 [PMID: 18616602]
  5. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Dec;13(12):1924-7 [PMID: 18258049]
  6. Vet Rec. 1996 Jan 20;138(3):53-8 [PMID: 8629329]
  7. J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jul;36(7):1840-5 [PMID: 9650922]
  8. Mol Pathol. 1998 Aug;51(4):209-14 [PMID: 9893747]
  9. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Jan;44(1):29-34 [PMID: 16390943]
  10. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1976;20(1):1-6 [PMID: 944209]
  11. Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Feb 7;273(1584):357-65 [PMID: 16543179]
  12. J Bacteriol. 2000 May;182(9):2393-401 [PMID: 10762237]
  13. Parasitology. 2008 Mar;135(3):309-17 [PMID: 18005472]
  14. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Sep;4(9):670-81 [PMID: 16912712]
  15. J Infect Dis. 2002 Jul 1;186(1):74-80 [PMID: 12089664]
  16. Vet Rec. 2006 Apr 8;158(14):490-1 [PMID: 16603556]
  17. Infect Immun. 2002 Oct;70(10):5568-78 [PMID: 12228284]
  18. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003 Sep;53(Pt 5):1305-1314 [PMID: 13130011]
  19. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000 Sep-Oct;6(5):539-42 [PMID: 10998387]
  20. Vet Rec. 2004 Sep 18;155(12):373-4 [PMID: 15493609]
  21. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Apr;35(4):907-14 [PMID: 9157152]
  22. Vet J. 2007 Mar;173(2):287-301 [PMID: 16434219]
  23. J Theor Biol. 2006 Mar 21;239(2):220-5 [PMID: 16242724]
  24. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 May;51(5):873-84 [PMID: 2425735]
  25. Eur Respir J. 1998 Apr;11(4):795-7 [PMID: 9623677]
  26. Vet Rec. 2006 Feb 18;158(7):246 [PMID: 16489169]
  27. Br Med J. 1977 Jul 30;2(6082):293-5 [PMID: 326347]
  28. Mol Microbiol. 1993 Dec;10(5):1057-65 [PMID: 7934856]
  29. Vet Microbiol. 2004 Nov 15;103(3-4):249-53 [PMID: 15504596]
  30. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Mar 19;99(6):3684-9 [PMID: 11891304]
  31. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1976 Feb;84(1):57-60 [PMID: 814785]
  32. Vet J. 2002 Sep;164(2):90-105 [PMID: 12359464]
  33. Microbiology (Reading). 1998 May;144 ( Pt 5):1189-1196 [PMID: 9611793]
  34. J Bacteriol. 2006 Jun;188(12):4271-87 [PMID: 16740934]
  35. Int J Infect Dis. 2007 Jul;11(4):300-8 [PMID: 17566777]
  36. J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Sep;36(9):2793-4 [PMID: 9742014]
  37. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2004;84(3-4):159-66 [PMID: 15207485]
  38. J Bacteriol. 2009 Mar;191(6):1951-60 [PMID: 19136597]
  39. J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Sep;40(9):3281-5 [PMID: 12202566]

MeSH Term

Animals
Bacterial Typing Techniques
Cat Diseases
Cats
Cluster Analysis
DNA Fingerprinting
DNA, Bacterial
Genetic Variation
Genotype
Geography
Molecular Epidemiology
Mycobacterium
Mycobacterium Infections
Rodentia
Sequence Deletion
United Kingdom

Chemicals

DNA, Bacterial

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MycobacteriumstrainsmicrotiMidentifiedspoligotypemoleculartypescatsgeographicallytuberculosiscomplexmuchchromosomalRD1micdescribeGreatBritaincharacteristicVNTRregionsshowdiversepreviouslythoughtlocalizedbovisinfectiondiseasememberbacteriaspeciesoriginallypathogensmallrodentsshrewsassociatedlimiteddiversityreducedpatternrecentlyspecificdeletionsDNAshowndefinegrouporganismscanabsenceregioncharacteristics141isolated14-yearperiodlossspacersallelesETR-EETR-Fvariable-numbertandem-repeatlocisampledeletedRD7RD9intactRD4RD12thereforepatternscommonsourcedomesticwaycattleUnitedKingdompathologysuggestfelinespillovermaintainedunknownwildmammalprobablyfieldvoleslocationsuggestsoverlapmicroti:

Similar Articles

Cited By (34)