The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children's vigilance towards deception.

Olivier Mascaro, Dan Sperber
Author Information
  1. Olivier Mascaro: Institut Jean Nicod, UMR 8129, Pavillon Jardin, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 29 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France. olivier.mascaro@gmail.com

Abstract

Vigilance towards deception is investigated in 3- to-5-year-old children: (i) In Study 1, children as young as 3 years of age prefer the testimony of a benevolent rather than of a malevolent communicator. (ii) In Study 2, only at the age of four do children show understanding of the falsity of a lie uttered by a communicator described as a liar. (iii) In Study 3, the ability to recognize a lie when the communicator is described as intending to deceive the child emerges around four and improves throughout the fifth and sixth year of life. On the basis of this evidence, we suggest that preference for the testimony of a benevolent communicator, understanding of the epistemic aspects of deception, and understanding of its intentional aspects are three functionally and developmentally distinct components of epistemic vigilance.

MeSH Term

Age Factors
Beneficence
Child Development
Child, Preschool
Communication
Concept Formation
Deception
Female
Humans
Intention
Judgment
Male
Morals
Psychology, Child
Social Perception
Trust

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0communicatordeceptionStudyunderstandingepistemictowardschildren3agetestimonybenevolentfourliedescribedaspectscomponentsvigilanceVigilanceinvestigated3-to-5-year-oldchildren:1youngyearspreferrathermalevolentii2showfalsityutteredliariiiabilityrecognizeintendingdeceivechildemergesaroundimprovesthroughoutfifthsixthyearlifebasisevidencesuggestpreferenceintentionalthreefunctionallydevelopmentallydistinctmoralmindreadingchildren's

Similar Articles

Cited By