Incremental value of integrated FDG-PET/CT in evaluating indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule for malignancy.

Chih-Yung Chang, Ching Tzao, Shih-Chun Lee, Cheng-Yi Cheng, Chang-Hsien Liu, Wen-Sheng Huang, Chih-Hung Ku, Jong-Kang Lee, Ching-Yee Oliver Wong
Author Information
  1. Chih-Yung Chang: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, 325 Section 2 Cheng-Kung Road, Taipei, Taiwan.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the increased diagnostic benefit of integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) interpretation in evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules for malignancy.
METHODS: One hundred seventeen patients (67 men and 50 women; mean age +/- SD, 61.7 +/- 13.6 years, range, 31-86 years) with indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodules and no previous history of malignancy were analyzed. PET/CT was performed with an integrated PET/CT scanner (Siemens Biograph BGO duo) 1 h after an intravenous injection of 370 MBq (10 mCi) (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose. Patients fasted for 6 h before imaging. PET was interpreted alone or combined with CT and was graded according to a five-point scale. A malignant diagnosis was based on histological findings or a clinical and radiological follow-up after at least 24 months. The diagnostic performances of PET alone and integrated PET/CT interpretation were evaluated using discriminant analysis.
RESULTS: PET alone correctly classified 85% of nodules and integrated PET/CT interpretation increased the correct classification to 89%, with similar sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 89%, respectively. False-positive PET results mainly resulted from granulomatous disorders. Four (50%) of the eight cases deemed indeterminate on PET alone were resolved with combined PET/CT interpretation.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the benefit attributable to the CT component was limited when integrated PET/CT was used, PET and CT acted synergistically to significantly increase the diagnostic veracity for PET-indeterminate nodules.

References

  1. Radiology. 1996 Jul;200(1):135-41 [PMID: 8657901]
  2. Chest. 1997 Aug;112(2):416-22 [PMID: 9266877]
  3. J Nucl Med. 2004 Oct;45(10):1640-6 [PMID: 15471827]
  4. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Nov;187(5):1361-7 [PMID: 17056930]
  5. J Nucl Med. 2006 Mar;47(3):426-31 [PMID: 16513611]
  6. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb;31(2):51-4 [PMID: 11302341]
  7. JAMA. 2001 Feb 21;285(7):914-24 [PMID: 11180735]
  8. Hong Kong Med J. 2004 Apr;10(2):107-16 [PMID: 15075431]
  9. J Nucl Med. 2007 Feb;48(2):214-20 [PMID: 17268017]
  10. Radiology. 1999 Aug;212(2):561-6 [PMID: 10429718]
  11. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 May;38(3):535-44 [PMID: 10855260]
  12. J Nucl Med. 2007 Oct;48(10):1583-91 [PMID: 17873133]
  13. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002 Jan;40(1):123-43, ix [PMID: 11813815]
  14. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug;191(2):475-9 [PMID: 18647920]
  15. J Nucl Med. 1994 Aug;35(8):1308-12 [PMID: 8046485]
  16. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Mar;16(3):1075-84 [PMID: 9508193]
  17. J Nucl Med. 1998 Jun;39(6):1016-20 [PMID: 9627336]
  18. Mol Imaging Biol. 2008 Mar-Apr;10(2):121-8 [PMID: 18204955]
  19. Radiology. 1993 Feb;186(2):405-13 [PMID: 8421743]
  20. J Nucl Med. 1994 Oct;35(10):1647-9 [PMID: 7931664]
  21. Mol Imaging Biol. 2004 Jul-Aug;6(4):183-7 [PMID: 15262233]
  22. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 May;170(5):1369-73 [PMID: 9574618]
  23. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Mar;25(3):429-33 [PMID: 15019673]
  24. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Jun;176(6):1363-9 [PMID: 11373192]
  25. Chest. 2003 Jan;123(1 Suppl):89S-96S [PMID: 12527568]
  26. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Sep;162(3 Pt 1):782-7 [PMID: 10988081]
  27. Chest. 1998 Sep;114(3):704-9 [PMID: 9743154]
  28. J Nucl Med. 1998 Jul;39(7):1267-9 [PMID: 9669408]
  29. J Nucl Med. 2008 Oct;49(10):1585-92 [PMID: 18794276]
  30. Mol Imaging Biol. 2008 May-Jun;10(3):147-53 [PMID: 18293042]
  31. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Summer;17(2):110-4 [PMID: 16087077]
  32. Eur Radiol. 2004 Aug;14(8):1380-91 [PMID: 15148623]
  33. Radiology. 2006 Apr;239(1):34-49 [PMID: 16567482]
  34. Clin Imaging. 2003 May-Jun;27(3):156-61 [PMID: 12727051]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Demography
Female
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
Male
Middle Aged
Positron-Emission Tomography
Reproducibility of Results
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Chemicals

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PET/CTintegratedPETinterpretationnodulesalonediagnosticsolitarypulmonarymalignancyindeterminateCTincreasedbenefitevaluating+/-6yearshcombined89%OBJECTIVES:objectivestudyevaluatepositronemissiontomography/computedtomographyMETHODS:Onehundredseventeenpatients67men50womenmeanageSD61713range31-86previoushistoryanalyzedperformedscannerSiemensBiographBGOduo1intravenousinjection370MBq10mCi18F-fluorodeoxyglucosePatientsfastedimaginginterpretedgradedaccordingfive-pointscalemalignantdiagnosisbasedhistologicalfindingsclinicalradiologicalfollow-upleast24monthsperformancesevaluatedusingdiscriminantanalysisRESULTS:correctlyclassified85%correctclassificationsimilarsensitivityspecificity88%respectivelyFalse-positiveresultsmainlyresultedgranulomatousdisordersFour50%eightcasesdeemedresolvedCONCLUSIONS:AlthoughattributablecomponentlimitedusedactedsynergisticallysignificantlyincreaseveracityPET-indeterminateIncrementalvalueFDG-PET/CTnodule

Similar Articles

Cited By