Abnormal auditory ERP N100 in children with dyslexia: comparison with their control siblings.

Charalabos Papageorgiou, Giorgos A Giannakakis, Konstantina S Nikita, Dimitris Anagnostopoulos, George N Papadimitriou, Andreas Rabavilas
Author Information
  1. Charalabos Papageorgiou: National Technical University of Athens, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Biomedical Simulations and Imaging Laboratory, Athens, Greece. ggian@biosim.ntua.gr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent research has implicated deficits of the working memory (WM) and attention in dyslexia. The N100 component of event-related potentials (ERP) is thought to reflect attention and working memory operation. However, previous studies showed controversial results concerning the N100 in dyslexia. Variability in this issue may be the result of inappropriate match up of the control sample, which is usually based exclusively on age and gender.
METHODS: In order to address this question the present study aimed at investigating the auditory N100 component elicited during a WM test in 38 dyslexic children in comparison to those of 19 unaffected sibling controls. Both groups met the criteria of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). ERP were evoked by two stimuli, a low (500 Hz) and a high (3000 Hz) frequency tone indicating forward and reverse digit span respectively.
RESULTS: As compared to their sibling controls, dyslexic children exhibited significantly reduced N100 amplitudes induced by both reverse and forward digit span at Fp1, F3, Fp2, Fz, C4, Cz and F4 and at Fp1, F3, C5, C3, Fz, F4, C6, P4 and Fp2 leads respectively. Memory performance of the dyslexics group was not significantly lower than that of the controls. However, enhanced memory performance in the control group is associated with increased N100 amplitude induced by high frequency stimuli at the C5, C3, C6 and P4 leads and increased N100 amplitude induced by low frequency stimuli at the P4 lead.
CONCLUSION: The present findings are in support of the notion of weakened capture of auditory attention in dyslexia, allowing for a possible impairment in the dynamics that link attention with short memory, suggested by the anchoring-deficit hypothesis.

References

  1. J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Spring;5(2):235-53 [PMID: 23972156]
  2. Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):122-35 [PMID: 15010244]
  3. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2005;16(2-3):157-71 [PMID: 16285467]
  4. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2003 Sep;2(3):155-78 [PMID: 15006291]
  5. Int J Psychophysiol. 1994 Dec;18(3):265-75 [PMID: 7775223]
  6. Brain Lang. 2000 May;72(3):238-45 [PMID: 10764519]
  7. J Hum Genet. 2007;52(2):104-109 [PMID: 17111266]
  8. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 29;338(5):307-12 [PMID: 9445412]
  9. J Child Neurol. 2004 Jul;19(7):471-81 [PMID: 15526950]
  10. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jan-Feb;16(1):40-52 [PMID: 15006035]
  11. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;45(1):2-40 [PMID: 14959801]
  12. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986 May;63(5):426-30 [PMID: 2420558]
  13. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2007 Jun;54(3):609-23, viii [PMID: 17543912]
  14. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;13(3):125-40 [PMID: 15254840]
  15. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60(3):157-61 [PMID: 18382111]
  16. Neuroreport. 2005 Nov 7;16(16):1829-32 [PMID: 16237336]
  17. Int J Psychophysiol. 2005 Apr;56(1):65-80 [PMID: 15725491]
  18. Neuroimage. 2008 Aug 1;42(1):158-68 [PMID: 18547820]
  19. J Commun Disord. 2003 May-Jun;36(3):221-31 [PMID: 12742669]
  20. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1989 Oct;31(5):569-81 [PMID: 2806738]
  21. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Nov;21(3):360-76 [PMID: 15511652]
  22. Science. 1973 Oct 12;182(4108):177-80 [PMID: 4730062]
  23. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Nov;11(11):458-65 [PMID: 17983834]
  24. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;44(6):888-903 [PMID: 12959497]
  25. Ear Hear. 1995 Feb;16(1):19-37 [PMID: 7774767]
  26. J Commun Disord. 2008 Sep-Oct;41(5):409-20 [PMID: 18466916]
  27. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):467-75 [PMID: 16099359]
  28. Prog Neurobiol. 1998 Jul;55(4):343-61 [PMID: 9654384]
  29. Mem Cognit. 2004 Jul;32(5):687-95 [PMID: 15552346]
  30. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Aug;51(4):1002-15 [PMID: 18658067]
  31. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jun 1;57(11):1301-9 [PMID: 15950002]
  32. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jan;61(1):129-41 [PMID: 18038344]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0N100memoryattentiondyslexiaERPcontrolauditorychildrencontrolsstimulifrequencyinducedP4workingWMcomponentHoweverpresentdyslexiccomparisonsiblinglowHzhighforwardreversedigitspanrespectivelysignificantlyFp1F3Fp2FzF4C5C3C6leadsperformancegroupincreasedamplitudeBACKGROUND:Recentresearchimplicateddeficitsevent-relatedpotentialsthoughtreflectoperationpreviousstudiesshowedcontroversialresultsconcerningVariabilityissuemayresultinappropriatematchsampleusuallybasedexclusivelyagegenderMETHODS:orderaddressquestionstudyaimedinvestigatingelicitedtest3819unaffectedgroupsmetcriteriaInternationalClassificationDiseasesICD-10evokedtwo5003000toneindicatingRESULTS:comparedexhibitedreducedamplitudesC4CzMemorydyslexicslowerenhancedassociatedleadCONCLUSION:findingssupportnotionweakenedcaptureallowingpossibleimpairmentdynamicslinkshortsuggestedanchoring-deficithypothesisAbnormaldyslexia:siblings

Similar Articles

Cited By